本研究旨在探討臺北市國民小學進行學校整併之相關問題，企圖建構出臺北市國民小學進行學校整併之評估指標及權重體系，以作為教育行政當局決策之參考及國民小學學校經營發展之方向。 本研究採用之研究方法包含文件分析、訪談、案例分析及問卷調查，透過訪談資料整理、敘述統計及分析層級程序法(Analytic Hierarchy Process )等建構出臺北市國民小學學校整併指標之權重體系。 本研究之結果發現，臺北市國民小學學校整併指標可區分為「學校整併性指標」，即學校符合指標即可評估進行整併，及「學校存在性指標」，即學校符合指標即可評估維持存在。「學校整併性指標」下轄4個第二層級指標及10個第三層級指標。「學校存在性指標」下轄3個第二層級指標及7個第三層級指標。 學校整併性指標下轄之第二層級指標中，政策決定指標、社會環境指標及教育經濟成本指標都有同等之重要性，第三層級指標中，則以與鄰近學校重疊性、全校學生人數、學校學生數成長率及學區新生兒數成長率有較高之重要性。 學校存在性指標下轄之第二層級指標中，以學生受教權益指標有較高之重要性，第三層級指標中，則以學校整併後交通便利性及學校弱勢學生比率有較高之重要性。 另本研究提出研究建議包括： 一、 對教育行政機關之建議 (一) 應完備推動學校整併之法令或準則。 (二) 應全面由教育經濟成本、政策決定及社會環境等面項評估學校是否需進行整併。 (三) 於評估學校整併時，應同時考量學校存在之需求性。 (四) 推動學校整併應有完整配套措施。 (五) 推動學校整併應採長期、階段及漸進方式及策略進行。 (六) 應追蹤學校整併厚達成預期效益情形。 二、 對後續研究之建議 (一)研究學校整併性指標及存在性指標之權重比率，判斷學校是否需進行 整併。 (二)透過不同研究方法修正學校整併指標。 (三)建構適合不同背景區域之學校整併指標。 (四)針對被整併學校進行個案研究，驗證整併指標適用性。 (五)探究臺北市學校整併其他問題。 / The main purpose of this study is to explore the issues on school consolidation of elementary school in Taipei and to attempt constructing the evaluation indicators and weighting systems while processing school consolidation for elementary schools in Taipei. The proven results could be directions for education authorities and elementary schools when they have choices in decision-making. The research methods include documents analysis, interview, case study, descriptive statistics and analytic hierarchy process to build up the weighting systems of school consolidation indicators for elementary schools in Taipei. The result of this study finds that school consolidation indicators for elementary schools in Taipei could be separarted from consolidation-featured indicators(a school could be considered to be consolidated if it fits the indicators) and existence-featured indicators(a school could be supposed to remain existent if it fits the indicators). Consolidation-featured indicators are consist of four second-hierarchy indicators and ten third-hierarchy indicators. Existence-featured indicators are consist of three second-hierarchy indicators and seven third-hierarchy indicators. Among the second-hierarchy indicators of consolidation-featured indicators, indicators of policy-making, social-environment and educational economic-cost have equal importance. Among the third-hierarchy indicators, indicators of function-overlapping between schools, aggregate numbers of students, growth rate of numbers of students and growth rate of new-born babies within school district have higher importance than other indicators. Among the second-hierarchy indicators of existence-featured indicators, indicators of the right for studens’s learning is more important than other indicators. Among the third-hierarchy indicators, the convenience of commuting after consolidation and the ratio of disadvantaged students within a school are more important than other indicators. This study provides advises for issues on school consolidation, including: (A) Advises for education administration 1.Giving complete impetus to orders or guidelines for school consolidation. 2.Evaluating school if it should be consolidated with another one by indicators of educational economic-cost, educational policy and social environment. 3.Considering the demand for schools’ existence when evaluating consolidation. 4.Forming complete sets when driving school consolidation. 5.Adopting long-term, multi-stage and gradual strategies to advance school consolidation. 6.Tracing the beneficial result after consolidation. (B) Advises for future researches: 1.Measuring the weights of consolidation-featured indicators and existence-featured indicators to judge whether one school should be consolidated with another one. 2.Through different research methods to correct the school consolidation indicators. 3.Designing different school consolidation indicators by areas and social environment. 4.Processing case study of the consolidated school in order to test and verify the fitness of indicators. 5.Exploring other issues on school consolidation of elementary schools in Taipei.