• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

縣市教師申訴評議委員會運作與影響因素之研究

林信安 Unknown Date (has links)
本研究依研究目的,係以問卷調查法進行了解縣市教師申訴評議委員會實際運作與影響因素之情形,透過各縣市教師申訴評議委員會之評議委員,對教師申訴制度運作及可能的影響因素提出看法,探討出教師申訴制度更佳的運作組織及模式並除去影響委員會為評議時不好的因素。 本研究資料係為調查問卷之處理,利用統計套裝軟體SPSS 13.0 for Windows,將問卷的資料進行登錄。以平均數、標準差等描述統計,來瞭解教師申訴評議委員對教師申訴評議委員會運作及其影響因素的看法。並以t-test來考驗假設之不同性別、法律背景、參與身分對影響教師申訴評議委員會運作及其影響因素各題項的看法是否有顯著差異。以單因子變異數分析,來考驗假設之不同年齡、申評會年資對影響教師申訴評議委員會運作及其影響因素各題項的看法是否有顯著差異,若有差異存在,則以Scheffě 法進行事後比較。茲將研究結論與建議分述如后。 綜上述,本研究結論如下: 一、教師申評會運作現況之分析 教師申訴評議委員會委員對於教師申評會的運作情形之現況最為肯定,其次為任務達成,再其次為組織成員,而以外在環境的影響為最低。 二、教師申評會影響因素之分析 教師申訴評議委員會委員對於教師申評會的影響因素的看法,認為最大的影響因素為組織成員本身,其次為任務達成情形,再者為運作情形,而以外在環境的影響為最低。 三、不同背景變項對教師申評會運作現況之分析 (一)不同年資申評會委員在申評會運作現況的看法中,在組織成員、運作情形、任務達成與外在環境上,均達顯著差異。 (二)屬於教師身份之申評會委員在申評會運作現況的看法中,在運作情形的看法上,顯著高於非教師身份的申評會委員,而在組織成員、任務達成與外在環境上,則無存在顯著差異。 四、不同背景變項對教師申評會影響因素之分析 (一)在應納入專業人士及應主動蒐集申訴案件資料的看法上,具有專業法律背景的申評會委員顯著高於無法律背景的申評會委員。 (二)在外在環境對於申訴評議的影響,有顯著差異存在。從事後比較的結果可以發現,35歲以下以及45歲以上的委員顯著高於36到45歲的申評會委員。 (三)在應訂立申訴標準與評議會受到社會對教師要求及觀感上有年資的差異。 (四)屬於非教師身份之申評會委員在申評會影響因素上,在外在環境的看法,顯著高於教師兼任的申評會委員。 關鍵字:教師申訴評議委員會、教師申訴制度 / The purpose of this study is to explore the actual operation and influential factors of Teacher Grievance Committees in each cities and counties. The author tries to know the operation of teacher grievance and its influential factors via grievance committee members, and attempt to find out the dysfunctional factors, and propose a better way and model to the actual operation of the system. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics methods, such as t-test and standard deviation with SPSS 13.0 for Windows, to understand the attitudes of teacher grievance committee members and the influential factors to committee. With the assumption verification with t-test and ANOVA, the author finds out the different committee member groups, such as gender, juridical background and participative identity, have different attitudes to the operation and influential factors of Teacher Grievance Committee at 0.5 significant levels. Significant differences are tested by Scheffé method. Major findings of this research include the following: 1. The analysis of the state of the arts of teacher grievance committees’ operation: Members of Teacher Grievance Committee mostly endorse “current operation of committee”, secondly and thirdly are “mission completion” and “members of organization,” the lowest is the “external environment”. 2. The analysis of influential factors of Teacher Grievance Committee: Most of the participants believe that Teacher Grievance Committees are highly affected by “members of organization” and “mission completion”, and slightly affected by “current operation of committee” and “external environment”. 3. The analysis of attitude to current operation of teacher grievance committee under different background variables: (1) The committee members, under different period of service, have significant differences on all variables including “current operation of committee”, “mission completion”, “members of organization” and “external environment”. (2) Comparison between committee members and Non-committee members: Only “current operation of committee” reached significant level. 4. The analysis of influential factors to Teacher Grievance Committee under different background variables: (1) The scores of the members who have juridical background apparently higher than the non-juridical background members on “extensively adopt opinions from professionals and actively collect appealing cases”. (2) The attitudes of the committee members on the influence of “external environment” are diverse. From the post-comparison result, the author find out the scores of the members whose are below 35 years old and above 45 years old are significantly higher than the members whose age are between 36-45 years old. (3) Members who under different year of service have different attitudes on “the complaint standard and appraisal would be influenced by the social requirement and perspectives on teachers. (4)The committee member who is not a teacher has higher score than the members who serve as teachers on “external environment”. Key Words: teacher grievance committee,teacher grievance system

Page generated in 0.0114 seconds