• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

美印戰略夥伴與中共區域強權之互動

張皖民 Unknown Date (has links)
印度為近代新興崛起的國家,在政治、經濟、資訊、科技與軍事上均有顯著的進步,其綜合國力的提升已不容忽視。尤其在經濟上的發展速度,更令世界各國所矚目,而現今世界公認的「金磚四國」中,印度則列居名單之內,其涵意代表著在未來國際權力地位追逐的過程當中,具有更深厚的競爭潛力。就地緣戰略的觀點而言,印度位於麻六甲海峽至波斯灣之間的交通樞紐,為非洲與中東地區能源及貿易物資輸往西太平洋的必經路線,而能源線的暢通與否,均牽動著東、南亞地區的經濟命脈。 冷戰結束後,兩極對抗的國際格局不再,印度新一代戰略菁英份子認為,印度應採取「以武力取代外交功能」的戰略觀。由於印、巴衝突所帶來的不安全感,及中共的核武構成的威脅,使得印度方面必須藉由核武發展與整建軍力,來化解印度所面臨的威脅,卻也引了發核武競賽問題。1947年印度獨立後美國並未重視,僅視印度是一個阻止共產主義擴散的國家。當印度躋身進入核武國家行列之後,便開始發崛印度在南亞地緣戰略的重要性,正因為印度國力逐漸提升,使得美、印兩國建立「邁向21世紀戰略夥伴」關係,來面對中國「和平崛起」的所帶來的挑戰。 1979年12月24日蘇聯入侵阿富汗後,卡特政府體認到印度戰略地位的重要性,視印度為防堵蘇聯共產勢力擴散的國家,於1980年再度恢復美、印核能合作計畫,提供有關核反應爐所需原料,藉此拉攏印度成為美國反共產主義的盟友。冷戰結束後,柯林頓政府提出了「交往與擴大的國家安全戰略」,強調「安全、經濟、民主」是美國外交政策的三大支柱,因而開始拓展與印度的合作範圍,加強經貿與軍事合作,以符合美國國家利益目標。 小布希總統上台,將中共定位為「戰略競爭者」的角色,視中國「和平崛起」對美國的威脅。「911」恐佈攻擊事件,美國雖與中共在反恐任務上共同合作,但仍不失其對中國的戒心,因此與印度共同結合成為「邁向21世紀的戰略夥伴」關係,以防止中國「和平崛起」對美國霸權地位的挑戰。 中國「和平崛起」強調努力發展和壯大自己,維護世界和平,堅持開放與平等互利原則,與各國發展經貿,強調現在與未來不稱霸。美印戰略合作,將使得中共在海洋戰略發展受限,同時更影響了中、印兩國的經貿發展。中國為了防止美、印戰略關係所形成的衝擊,必須展現其大國外交作風,穩固與印度經貿上的合作,深化與歐盟實質關係,運用「上海合作組織」來強化其在區域大國的地位,以防範美國對其所實施的新圍堵策略。 / India, one of emerging countries in recent years, has had great progress in politics, economics, information, technology and military. India’s current social status and economic strength has drawn everyone’s attention, especially in BRICs, it plays an important part. In terms of its geo-strategic prospects, India, locating between Strait of Malacca and Persia Gulf, is an essential commercial access. After the Cold War, the new-generation elites think India should take the strategy of replacing democratic function with power. Because of the fear resulting from the India-Pakistan conflicts and the threat of nuclear power in China Communist, India must rebuild its military forces by developing nuclear power so that some threat to the national defense will be released. The problem about nuclear competition is getting worse. As a result, America and India start to set up “the relationships of strategic partnership toward 21st century” to face the challenge coming from “Peaceful Rise” in China. After Soviet invaded Afghanistan in December 24, 1979, the Cater Administration, realizing the importance of India’s strategic status, regarded India as a defense stopping the communist from spreading and regained the nuclear cooperation plan between America and India to make India a member of the alliance of anti-china communist. After the Cold War, the Clinton Administration addressed the strategy of “enlargement and engagement”, emphasizing that safety, economics and democracy are three main parts in diplomatic policy in U.S.A. America started to cooperate with India in commerce and military to meet their own national interest. George, W. Bush considered China a “strategic competitor” and regarded “Peaceful Rise” as a threat to America. After 911 terror attack. America made efforts to establish the relationship of “strategic partnership toward 21st century” with India and prevent China’s “Peaceful Rise” from challenging America’s powerful status. America and India’s cooperation restricts the development of China’s ocean strategy and influences the development of economics and commerce between China and India. Therefore, China tries hard to make use of “Shanghai Cooperation Organization” to reinforce its status and guard against America’s “Geopolitics”.

Page generated in 0.0127 seconds