本研究之目的主要為探討國民小學校長課程領導與教師教學效能二者之間的關係。 　　本研究主要採用文獻分析法、問卷調查法以及訪談法等研究方法。在問卷調查方面，以臺北縣90所公私立國民小學的90位校長與810位教師為調查對象，問卷回收後以描述統計分析、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、典型相關分析、多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法進行資料分析。在訪談方面則從上述學校中選擇2所學校，每校訪談校長、主任、教師各1位。本研究期能透過上述的設計，了解校長與教師對課程領導與教師教學效能二者關係的具體看法與建議。 　　本研究之結論歸納如下： 　　一、臺北縣國民小學校長與教師均肯定校長課程領導。 　　二、臺北縣國民小學校長與教師均肯定教師教學效能。 　　三、不同背景變項的校長對於本身課程領導的評價差別不大。 　　四、在教師的背景變項中，除了最高學歷之外，其餘變項均會影響其對校長課程領導的評價。 　　五、不同背景變項的校長在教師教學效能上的評價差別不大。 　　六、在教師的背景變項中，除了年齡與服務年資之外，其餘變項對教師教學效能的影響不大。 　　七、校長實施課程領導確實有助於提升教師教學效能。 　　八、在校長課程領導各層面中，以「促進教師專業成長」對於整體教師教學效能的預測力最高。 　　本研究依據結論，於教育行政機關、校長、教師以及未來研究，提出以下具體建議： 　　一、對教育行政機關的建議 　　　（一）重視校長的培育與進修，不斷提升校長實施課程領導的實力。 　　　（二）依據地方差異，給予課程領導行政支援。 　　二、對國民小學校長的建議 　　　（一）發揮課程領導權利，善盡課程領導義務。 　　　（二）營造優質校園文化，建構學習型學校。 　　　（三）促進教師專業成長，提升教師教學效能。 　　三、對國民小學教師的建議 　　　（一）成為「合作的學習者」，彼此交流教學經驗與資源。 　　　（二）成為「行動的研究者」，探索提升教學效能之道。 　　四、對未來研究的建議 　　　（一）在研究範圍方面：本研究以台北縣為研究範圍，建議未來研究可以全臺灣地區為研究範圍，以擴大研究的廣度。 　　　（二）在研究方法方面：除了文獻探討、問卷調查與訪談之外，建議未來研究再增加個案研究法，以擴大研究的深度。 / The purpose of this study was to inquire the relationship between principals' curriculum leadership and teachers' teaching effectiveness in elementary schools. 　　This study methods were adopted literature review, questionnaire and in-depth interviews. In questionnaire aspect, the subjects included 90 principals and 810 teachers from 810 public and private schools in Taipei County. The collected data were analyzed through the methods of descriptive statistic, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's product-moment correlation, canonical correlation and multiple stepwise regression analysis. In addition, interviews had selected two schools from the sample of questionnaire. It is hoping that through this design to collect and understand the relationship between principals' curriculum leadership and teachers' teaching effectiveness as well as real life phenomenon of the researched subject. 　　Conclusions were made as followings: 　　1. Most principals and teachers agree the behavior of principals' curriculum leadership in elementary schools of Taipei County. 　　2. Most principals and teachers agree the behavior of teachers' teaching effectiveness in elementary schools of Taipei County. 　　3. Principals among diverse background variables take a similar view in their own curriculum leadership. 　　4. Teachers among diverse background variables, except the highest academic background, the rest variables will affect evaluations on principals' curriculum leadership. 　　5. Principals among diverse background variables take a similar view in teachers' teaching effectiveness. 　　6. Teachers among diverse background variables, except age and service seniority, the rest variables will have little influence on teachers' teaching effectiveness. 　　7. To put principals' curriculum leadership into practice is indeed conducive to promote teachers' teaching effectiveness. 　　8. Among all dimensions of principals' curriculum leadership, the highest prediction to total teachers' teaching effectiveness is promoting teachers' professional growth. 　　According to the conclusions, following are the suggestions： 　　1. Suggestions for educational administration organizations 　　　1) Respecting the nurture and further education of principals and enhance the strength of curriculum leadership constantly. 　　　2) In accordance with variation of locality, offering administrative supports for curriculum leadership. 　　2. Suggestions for principals of elementary schools 　　　1) Functioning curriculum leadership rights, fulfilling curriculum leadership obligations. 　　　2) Building high quality campus cultures, constructing learning schools. 　　　3) Promoting teachers’professional growth, enhancing teachers' teaching effectiveness. 　　3. Suggestions for teachers of elementary schools 　　　1) Becoming cooperative learners, communicating the experiences of and resources to each other. 　　　2) Becoming action researchers, enhancing the way to teachers' teaching effectiveness. 　　4. Suggestions for future research 　　　1) Aspects in research scope: the study ranging from Taipei County, suggest future research could include the whole Taiwan area to expand the breadth of study. 　　2) Aspects in research method: besides literature review, questionnaire and in-depth interviews, suggest future research could add case study to expand the depth of study.

本研究旨在使用後設分析方法探討我國校長課程領導與教師教學效能之關聯性。藉由2002年至2012年間研究此兩變項相關之15篇博碩士論文的研究數據進行後設分析，討論兩變項整體相關性以及細部跨變項的相關性。並投入性別、服務年資、學歷、是否兼任行政職務、學校層級及研究地區等特徵，探討其在校長課程領導與教師教學效能關係中是否具有調節作用。本研究主要發現：（一）整體校長課程領導與整體教師教學效能之間具有正向的相關性。（二）整體校長課程領導與教師教學效能細部構面間皆有正向相關性。（三）整體教師教學效能與校長課程領導細部構面間皆有正向的相關性。（四）校長課程領導與教師教學效能各細部構面間具有正向的相關性。（五）新進教師比與研究所學歷比在校長課程領導與教師教學效能間具有調節作用。（六）性別比、兼任行政職務比、學校層級及研究地區在校長課程領導與教師教學效能間不具有調節作用。 最後，依據研究結論針對實務及後續研究提出參考。 / The main purpose of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis on the relationship between principal curriculum leadership and teacher teaching effectiveness. The research data were collected from 15 independent doctoral or master theses on the relationship between these two variables, all of which were published during 2002-2012. The study discusses the relationship between two variables and each variable between the sub-variables. The study also discusses whether variables moderate the relationship, including gender, working years, education background, administration affairs, school levels and the research location. 　　The main findings of this study are: (1)There is a positive relationship between principal curriculum leadership and teacher teaching effectiveness. (2)There are positive relationships between principal curriculum leadership and the sub-variables of the teacher teaching effectiveness. (3)There are positive relationships between the sub-variables of the principal curriculum leadership and the teacher teaching effectiveness. (4)There are positive relationships between the sub-variables of the principal curriculum leadership and the sub-variables of the teacher teaching effectiveness. (5)The percentage of newly-employed teachers and the percentage of teachers with masters or higher degree are found the significant moderators between principal curriculum leadership and teacher teaching effectiveness. (6) The gender-ratio, teacher-as-administrator ratio, the school levels and the location are found not the significant moderators between principal curriculum leadership and teacher teaching effectiveness. The researcher provides suggestions for future research and practice according to the findings.