檔案是歷史與知識的寶庫，倘能積極培育檔案素養，將使得國人具備檔案之基本知識，並進而有效促使國人運用檔案資料。因此，檔案界應儘速訂定出一套符合檔案內涵的檔案素養指標，以作為日後推行檔案教育的基礎，本研究的目的在於 (一) 探討素養以及資訊素養的定義以及內涵，進而探討檔案素養的定義與內涵。(二) 探討各種不同學門素養的定義以及資訊素養的評估指標，制定出一套評估檔案素養的指標。(三) 透過本研究之分析，期能進一步提供台灣地區培育檔案素養之參考建議，以促進社會大眾對檔案專業的瞭解。 本論文主要是探討檔案素養評估指標，採疊慧法進行研究，由檔案界學者專家以及資深檔案管理者共同參與，將檔案素養能力分成：三個向度，十七項能力評估指標，包括：覺知到檔案的特點與內涵、檔案應用能力以及檔案資源搜尋的能力，透過兩回合的問卷反覆調查，當所有參與者的意見達到一致性與穩定性，則視為研究結束。 就上述研究結果，提出五項建議：(一) 儘速訂定我國檔案素養評估標準；(二) 加強檔案管理人員之檔案素養培訓，可針對本研究之三個面向，十七項能力指標；(三) 編訂檔案素養教育相關之課程教材，建議開設檔案素養相關課程，針對不同的年齡層及學科背景，將檔案教育融入學生課程中；(四) 積極推行檔案素養，辦理與檔案素養相關之推廣活動，以收檔案素養普及化之成效；(五) 評估檔案素養推行之成效，推行檔案素養三至五年後，依據檔案素養評估標準來評估整體的執行成效，以判斷是否達到提昇國人檔案素養的效果，同時可作為日後修訂檔案素養評估標準之重要參考依據。 / Archives is the treasure of history and knowledge. If we can actively cultivate the archival literacy, we will make people have the basic knowledge of archives and make them use archives efficiently. Therefore, the archival sector should build up the indicators of the archival literacy as soon as possible. It will be the foundation of the archival education in the future. The study aims to (1) research the definition and connotation of the archival literacy according to which of the literacy and information literacy; (2) build the indicators of the archival literacy according to the definition of the different professional areas’ literacy and the indicators of the information literacy; (3) through the analysis of this study, we hope we can provide the suggestions and references for cultivating the archival literacy in Taiwan, and promoting the professional archives to the public. This thesis explored the indicators of the archival literacy based on Delphi methodology. The Delphi panel collaborated with two groups of experts, archival academic experts and the professional archivists. The indicators of the archival literacy was carried out three faces, and seventeen indicators. The three faces include the acknowledgement of the characteristic of archives, archival utilization ability, and archival access ability. The study was ended when all participants’ opinions had reached consensus or stability after two rounds of questionnaire survey. From the results of the study, we made five recommendations: (1)It is necessary to build up the standards of the archival literacy in Taiwan;(2) We should strengthen archival literacy training to the archivists, according to the three faces and seventeen indicators;(3)We should add the archival literacy’s educational curriculum materials into the students’ courses for different age and disciplines background;(4) We should actively promote the archival literacy. In order to promote the archival literacy, we can hold the archives related promotional activities ;(5) and we will evaluate the effectiveness of promoting the archival literacy after three to five years, it will be very significant references to revise the indicators of archival literacy in the future.