本研究旨在探究我國教師組織未來發展之方向，校園內勞僱間權益事項的問題，是否必要透過”教師工會”的方式進行協商和討論，以謀求解決之道。目前的教評會和”教師會”在制度設計中，雖然也有若干工會的功能，但是在勞僱關係的法定權利當中最重要的團結、協商和爭議權等，皆不明確，因而在面對重大權利問題和決策的過程中，教師往往是政策的被動接受者，公務員的角色，也嚴重限制了教師可採取的行動策略與範圍。除非目前的教評會或”教師會”的權利取得突破，否則教育部實在沒有理由阻止教師籌組工會。”教師會”改變轉型為”教師工會”之過程與發展，及所遭遇之困境，為本研究之重點。 / This research will explore challenges and future development of the teacher’s organization in our country. Will there be any substantial changes in the relationship among stakeholders on campus in terms of rights and obligations? Will it a better solution to carry on consultation and dispute reconciliation by organizing teacher’s union? Although certain functions exist in the present system designs of the Teacher Arbitrating Committee and Teacher Association, crucial rights of unity, consultation, and dispute that teachers could enjoy are not all explicit. Teachers are often passive receivers of policies. Worse still, as para-public officials, they are severely limited in strategy and scope of viable options. Only when a Teacher Arbitrating Committee or Teacher Association makes a breakthrough, can we consider these rights adequately protected. The Ministry of Education has no reason to deny such unionizing. This research examines development of the Teacher Association (TA), and explores the need to transform TA into Teacher Union (TU), as well as obstacles encountered.