1 |
中共參與國際安全建制的絕對與相對利益分析:以南海爭端為例 / The Analysis of Absolute and Relative Gain on China's Joining International Security Regime: A Case Study of South China Sea Dispute徐笠嫻, Li-Hsien Hsu Unknown Date (has links)
自2009年起,美國透過一系列政策宣示、外交行動施行重返亞洲政策,在涉及七個聲索方的南海主權爭端之中,美國的介入將會為難解的南海爭端增添更加複雜的因子。南海爭端的動態之所以受到關注,除了中共持續增長的綜合國力、美國將焦點投注至亞洲區域、防止潛在競爭對手產生的策略,南海爭端實際上為中、美角力的縮影。未來南海問題的發展,將可能影響區域、乃至國際的和平,必須持續關注。
中國所面對的國際環境正在轉變,此將影響其對於國家利益的認知與選擇,本文將以新現實與新自由主義的論爭,檢視近年美國重返亞洲後造成南海爭端再起的案例,並探討中共參與國際建制的利益認知、瞭解中共在冷戰後的多極化國際社會中的相對定位。
本文將分文三大部分:第一部分為國際關係理論與概念分析,將從國際關係理論與國際建制的探討,到中共參與國際安全建制的理論與概況,再進一步聚焦於中共的南海政策與主張;第二部分介紹南海爭端中其他聲索方之主張,以及各聲索方與中共在南海互動歷程,並探討為處理南海爭端而建立的安全建制演變與成效;第三部分將探討國際情勢的變化對國家外交政策的影響,以南海爭端為例,說明美國因素對中共外交利益視角造成的影響。
本文所欲探討的問題為:第一、中共為何願意採取相較溫和的「擱置爭議、共同開發」政策?又,在中共積極塑造負責任大國及營造友好周邊環境的目標下,為何「南海行為準則」的談判進度遲滯?第二、從國際關係理論研究南海問題,探討兩新學派之中何者較具解釋力?第三、國際建制是否有助於國際合作?最後,針對南海爭端對我國的啟示,也將在本文末章進行討論。
|
2 |
中共應對美國「重返亞洲」策略之研究 / Research of China’s Countermeasures againt the U.S.’s “Asia Rebalancing” policy馬順隆 Unknown Date (has links)
中共自1979年推行「改革開放」政策,其社會主義市場經濟進入快速成長軌道,隨著綜合國力的日漸崛起,牽動著亞太區域乃至國際地緣政治的變化,並引發周邊國家對其國家戰略及軍事意圖產生疑慮,即使中共一再闡述「和平發展」及透過對話方式,以期化解各國對其崛起發展的疑懼,但由於開放資訊程度的不透明,在短期內迭起的「中國威脅論」難以改觀。
盱衡當今全球局勢,「中」美關係的發展確是重要考量因素。美國當前全球戰略與其國家安全利益,即是防止區域霸權崛起,威脅美國的區域安全利益。面對中共的崛起,美國己展開「重返亞洲」再平衡策略等一系列的遏制舉措,中共則展現企圖掌控亞太霸權的動機極其明顯。中共與美國戰略利益衝突勢難避免,可見未來的「中」美關係將更為嚴峻,這是中共第五代領導人習近平上台後及美國總統歐巴馬第二任期內的極大挑戰。從區域政治、經濟、安全的視角,無論是亞太區域權力競合、經濟資源開發或軍事策略運作、東海及南海主權爭議等,在在影響「中」美戰略競逐與形勢消長。
美國自2008年全球金融風暴之後,經濟頹勢與財政困頓,而中共的市場經濟持續發展,對於美國恢復經濟動能十分重要。由於經濟的互賴日漸加深,雙方處於一種既競爭又合作的關係。在此種競合交錯的複雜環境下,美國重返亞洲的策略布局,已然被中共視為遏制其崛起的一大挑戰。因此,全力在經濟、外交與軍事上採取各種反制的作為。在「中」美戰略競逐的新形勢下,中共應可體認自身實力與限制因素,在國際戰略情勢中,尋求對自己最有利的位置。 / Since the People’s Republic of China (PRC) released the “Chinese Economic Reform” in 1979, its socialism-oriented market economy has gone into a fast-growing orbit. With the rise of comprehensive national power, PRC has influenced the shape of Asia-Pacific region, even the global geopolitics, and resulted in the neighboring countries’ doubt on its national strategies and military intentions. Although PRC seeks to dissolve other countries’ doubt and fear through expounding on its peaceful development and dialogue, the opacity of information makes it difficult to change their views in a short time.
The development of China-United States relations is indeed a major consideration in current global situation. The global strategies and national security interests of United States are to prevent the rise of regional hegemony from threatening its regional security interests. Facing the rise of PRC, United States has implemented rebalancing strategy “Pivot to Asia” as one of the containment measures. On the other hand, the motivations which China is competing for the leadership in Asia-Pacific are obvious. The conflict of strategic interests between PRC and United States is inevitable, and their relations will be more difficult in the foreseeable future. It will be a great challenge for Xi Jinping’s administration, the PRC fifth leadership generation, and United Sates President Obama’s second term. In the perspective of regional politics, economics and security, whether the power competition in Asia-Pacific, development of economic resources, implementation of military strategies, or the sovereignty disputes in the East and South China Sea, they are all influencing the increase and decrease of the strategic competition and situation between China and United States.
Since the global financial crisis in 2008, the economy and finance of United States have suffered from recession. However, the market economy of PRC is continuing to grow and plays an important role to provide momentum for United States’ economy to recover. Due to the deepening economic interdependence, the relations of both sides can be competitive and cooperative. PRC has regarded Unites States’ “Pivot to Asia ”strategy as a challenge to contain it’s rise and therefore implemented economic, diplomatic, and military countermeasures. In the new situation of China-United States strategic competition, the PRC shall be aware of its strength and limitations to find its most strategic position in the international strategic circumstances.
|
3 |
習近平主政後中美南海政策之研究 / A Study of Sino - American Policy Towards the South China Sea after Xi Jinping 's Reign陳忠溪, Chen, Chung Hsi Unknown Date (has links)
2013年3月14日,習近平成為中共的最高領導人,不同於前幾代中國大陸領導人,習近平提出了「中國夢」的願景,不僅為主導與型塑著習近平時代中共的對外政策、戰略規劃與全球佈局,且其的內涵伴隨著情勢發展和現實需要不斷的擴充,不僅積極應處周邊關係,穩定亞太地區、妥善處理海權爭議、牽制美國亞太「再平衡」戰略,並向西推進「一帶一路」戰略。
而在亞太地區被公認為世界經濟發動的火車頭之際,「重返亞洲」則成美國最重要的外交目標。歐巴馬政府重新調整外交政策,強調透過盟友、國際制度、謹慎的外交及道德理想的力量來爭取他人認同美國的目標,藉此促進本身的利益;同時,藉由增加在該地區的政治、經濟和軍事投入,逐漸提升其他國家對於美國的信任,藉此鞏固美國的領導地位。
美中雙方為何這麼在意在南海區域的發展及權利伸張,美國在仲裁案後特別強調南海是美國「最高國家利益」,而中方也早早就說過南海是中國的「核心利益」,如此是否註定中美兩方必在南海地區發生權力爭奪戲碼,不禁令人要問美、中雙方到底誰才是破壞南海和平或南海秩序的國家?
南海究竟具備什麼樣的地理特性或其他重要的條件,讓世界的霸權及崛起的強權交集的南海地區,而使這個地區被學者示警南海恐成第3次世界大戰舞臺。 / On March 14, 2013, Xi Jinping became the supreme leader of the Chinese Communist Party. Unlike the leaders of the previous generation of mainland China, Xi Jinping put forward the vision of "Chinese Dream", not only for the foreign policy and strategic planning And the global layout, and its connotation along with the development of the situation and the reality needs to continue to expand, not only actively should be peripheral relations, stability in the Asia-Pacific region, properly handle the sea dispute, contain the US Asia-Pacific "rebalancing" strategy, and westward " Along the way "strategy.
In the Asia-Pacific region is recognized as the world economy launched the locomotive, the "return to Asia" has become the United States the most important diplomatic goals. The Obama administration has reoriented its foreign policy by emphasizing the goal of the United States through its allies, international regimes, prudent diplomatic and moral ideals, to promote its own interests; by increasing the political, Economic and military investment, and gradually enhance the confidence of other countries for the United States, to consolidate the US leadership.
Why the United States and China are concerned about the development of the South China Sea region and the right to extend the United States in the arbitration case, especially stressed that the South China Sea is the United States "the highest national interest", and the Chinese side has long said that the South China Sea is China's "core interests", so destined China and the United States will be in the South China Sea area of power to compete for drama, can not help but to ask the United States, the two sides in the end who is the destruction of the South China Sea peace or the South China Sea order of the country?
The South China Sea has what kind of geographical features or other important conditions, so that the world's hegemony and the rise of the power of the intersection of the South China Sea region, leaving the region by the students to warn the South China Sea fear of the third World War stage.
|
Page generated in 0.022 seconds