資料發掘研究重點在於幫助使用者從眾多現存資料中發掘出隱藏於其內前所未知且可能非常有用的資訊。本研究應用資料發掘技術於通識課程規劃上，經由文獻探討建立初步的研究架構，採用政大學生選修通識課程之資料進行資料發掘，最後分析結果可作為未來政大通識課程規劃之參考。 傳統規劃通識課程的方式多是以老師為出發點，這樣的規劃方式難免有欠考量之處，而學生選課必須依據老師所開的課程，未必能選修到自已真正有興趣的通識課程。本研究以學生需求觀點為出發點，將學生選修通識課程行為對應到顧客購物行為觀念上，再應用資料發掘技術來分析政大通識課程，建立學生─顧客、課程─商品及老師─商品品牌的對應分析模式，透過資料發掘技術的分析方法，找出學生選擇通識課程的特性與關鍵，可以提供通識課程規劃另一個方向的思考，使得通識課程的規劃更加更切合學生需求。

通識教育為高等教育改革的要點之一，然而近年來通識革新較傾向於制度與教學評鑑上的關注，對於課程實質內容的深入探析與整體研究相對不足，另一方面教育理念雖常呼籲學生聲音，然在大學中聆聽學生觀點的機會仍屈指可數。是以本研究企圖透過「重要但缺乏」的觀點來關注課程，二來期望前述探究能透過學生觀點來檢視。首先，為建立資料分析的參照，本研究分析國內外14所大學（含政大）通識課程的目標、結構與科目。繼而，進一步透過問卷調查754位政大四年級學生，有效樣本716位（抽樣誤差於正負3.14%之間），來探究學生對通識的定義及其認為通識課程「重要但缺乏」的內容，研究發現如下： 一、在學生對通識的定義方面：（1）全體大四生的通識定義近八成為主修專業之外、各領域入門、基礎常識、社會生活應備、思考與學習方法與人格情意陶冶；（2）從學院來看，各學院通識定義高度相似，惟教育學院通識定義歧異度略低；（3）從性別來看，除了男女前五大通識定義高度相似，整體而言男生較有整體與掌控之意涵，而女生較有個人、實用、思考與順應之意涵。 二、在學生認為通識「重要但缺乏」的內容方面：（1）大多數全體大四生所列舉的內容多屬實作實務性質（如：烹飪、設計），另還包括具生活基本能力性質、生活品味性質以及認識非主流的弱勢性質之內容；（2）從學院來看，各學院多以烹飪、人際社交、實作實務為重要但缺乏的內容；（3）從性別來看，除了男女前三大列舉內容高度相似之外，整體而言男生較有規範、傳承與責任之意象（如：道德倫理），而女生較有個人、美感與情感之意象（如：美妝儀態）。最後，本研究對政大通識課程、通識課程研究方法及建立長期研究基礎提出建議與討論。 / General education (GE) has been of great significance in the higher education reformations. However, in recent years GE reformations had inclined to focus on its institutionalization and instructional evaluation rather than its curriculum content. Besides, even the student-centered concept has been constantly promoted in education, there were still rare chances for students to voice in university. Under such circumstances, this study is aimed to examine the GE curriculum especially through the perspective of the null curriculum and the students. To provide a reference before exploring the null curriculum, the study first went through the documentary analysis of the aim, structure and course in 14 universities’ GE curriculum throughout Taiwan and the United States. The study further conducted a survey on the NCCU seniors’ viewpoints on the GE definition and what is important but missing in GE curriculum, 716 among 754 questionnaires were valid (the sampling error is approximately 3.14%). The results indicate that in the viewpoint of NCCU seniors: 1. The definition of general education: (1) for the majority of seniors, it tends to be outside the discipline, the introduction of each discipline, basic common sense, the social life-oriented, the thinking and learning methods as well as the personality cultivation. (2) from the college-level term, each college shares a high degree of similarity, in which the college of education tends to be in less diverse. (3) from the gender-level term, besides the male and female students share a high similarity in the top 5 definitions, more male students show the overall sense of the wholeness and the control, while female students show the overall sense of more personal, being practical, thinking and the will to adapt others. 2. The “important but missed” content in general education: (1) for the majority of seniors, it tends to be the chance of performing and experiencing in person (ex: cooking, design), the basic surviving skills, the life taste enhancement as well as the understanding of the minorities within the non-mainstream. (2) from the college-level term, every college show high percentage in the courses regarding cooking, social interations and the implementation of practice. (3) from the gender-level term, besides the male and females students share a high similarity in the top 3 courses, more male students show the overall sense of standard, inheritance regarding the seniority and responsibility (ex: morality and ethic), on the other hand, more female students show the overall sense of more personal space, aesthetics and emotion (ex: appearance care). According to the results, the study implies some discussions and suggestions for the GE curriculum in NCCU, the methodology of GE curriculum researches, and the basis for long-term researches.

檔案素養係指個人擁有對於檔案方面的基礎知識，能夠瞭解自身檔案需求，以及具備有效率地查詢、分析、選擇、評估、利用及傳播檔案資訊的能力。但國內對於檔案應用的概念相較於圖書館的圖書館利用仍較顯薄弱，換而言之，即是檔案素養之概念較不普及。檔案界可效法圖書資訊界進行圖書館利用教育之經驗，也投入檔案利用教育之推行，並結合國內通識教育之發展，開設檔案素養通識課程，進一步培養大學生檔案素養能力。 本研究之目的，在於探討國內外檔案素養與資訊素養教育理念及其必要性，以及瞭解大學師生對於檔案素養通識課程內容規劃之意見與期許，並進一步提出較完整的大學檔案素養通識課程主題綱要與後續發展建議。 本研究參考國內外資訊素養與檔案素養相關課程綱要，整合檔案素養通識課程內容，分析歸納檔案素養通識教育所應具備的要點，並依此擬定一份檔案素養通識課程主題單元規劃。後續再搭配深度訪談法，分別由大學教師與學生雙方觀點來評估該份課綱之適用性，並依據訪談結果進行課程主題單元之調整。綜合訪談結果，本研究最終提出之檔案素養通識課程規劃有檔案知識、檔案實務工作、檔案檢索、檔案應用以及檔案倫理等五大主題，各主題之下共有22個概念單一之子單元，以供授課教師依其需求精確挑選欲與課程結合之內容。 本研究建議後續檔案素養通識課程，可彈性結合本研究歸納出之檔案素養通識課程主題綱要，建立符合教師需求之課程綱要；也可與資訊素養、文史相關通識或圖書館利用教育結合；在課程內容方面，課程設計將理論與實務相結合，使課程內容多元延伸。 / Archival literacy means that someone has the basic knowledge of archives, realizes his needs of archives, and has the abilities of searching, analyzing, choosing, evaluating, using and broadcasting archival resources. However, the concept of archival public access is not as well-known as borrowing books in the library, which means that the concept of archival literacy is less popular than library instruction. To improve the notability of archival literacy, we can follow the example of library instruction to promote archives instruction, or follow the development of general education in Taiwan to offer the archival literacy courses, which can cultivate the ability of archival literacy of college students. The purpose of this study is to explore the educational philosophy and the necessity of archival literacy and information literacy at home and abroad, and to realize the opinions and expectations of the plan of archival literacy courses from college students and teachers. Furthermore, to offer a much more complete syllabus of archival literacy courses and to make some suggestions of follow-up development. The study explores the syllabuses of information literacy and archival literacy courses at home and abroad, and integrates the contents of these courses to analyze and sum up some principles that should take into consideration while planning archival literacy courses. According to these principles, we’ll make a list of subjects and units as for the plan of archival literacy courses. The study also explores individual views and considerations by in-depth interviewing college students who had taken a course about archival literacy and teachers that are studying in the field of archives, had been working at the archives, or had lots of experience of archival accessing. From the result we adjust the syllabus to a more flexible module includes five subjects and 22 plain units. The five subjects are: (1) the knowledge of archives, (2) the practical work of archives, (3) archives retrieval, (4) archives access (5) ethic of archives. Teachers could choose any topics or units that exactly meet their demands to combine with their syllabuses. The study suggests that the archival literacy courses follow-up could choose some subjects or units from the syllabus that the study sorted out to make their syllabuses meet their demands; the archival literacy courses could be combined with historical course or library instruction. Finally, for the content of the curriculums, it should combine theory with practical works. Choose more units like visiting archives or accessing archives could excite the students’ interest and improve their wills to get into the class.