手稿本 / 論文(碩士)--香港中文大學,1974. / 參考文獻: leaves 1-9(2d group) / 鮑觀海. / Chapter 第一章 --- 龔自珍之生平 --- p.1 / Chapter 第二章 --- 龔自珍之學 --- p.11 / Chapter （甲） --- 師友郊遊 --- p.11 / Chapter （一） --- 常州學派 --- p.11 / Chapter (a) --- 莊存與 --- p.20 / Chapter (b) --- 劉逢祿 --- p.27 / Chapter (c) --- 交遊 --- p.30 / Chapter (d) --- 結論 --- p.34 / Chapter （二） --- 段玉裁 --- p.39 / Chapter （三） --- 章學诚 --- p.44 / Chapter （四） --- 王引之 --- p.53 / Chapter （乙） --- 與儒、佛之關係 --- p.61 / Chapter （丙） --- 治學態度 --- p.69 / Chapter （丁） --- 政治主張 --- p.76 / Chapter （戊） --- 廣博的學問 --- p.83 / Chapter 第三章 --- 龔自珍的文 --- p.95 / Chapter （甲） --- 龔氏論说之文 --- p.95 / Chapter （一） --- 立論 --- p.95 / Chapter （二） --- 氣勢 --- p.105 / Chapter （三） --- 澀 --- p.114 / Chapter （四） --- 怪 --- p.117 / Chapter （乙） --- 龔氏奏議疏之文 --- p.122 / Chapter （一） --- 博學與見識 --- p.122 / Chapter （二） --- 迫切激憤的心情 --- p.127 / Chapter （丙） --- 龔氏序跋之文　 --- p.133 / Chapter （丁） --- 龔氏雜记之文 --- p.140 / Chapter （戊） --- 龔氏博狀碑誌之文 --- p.157 / Chapter （己） --- 龔氏的駢文　 --- p.169 / Chapter （庚） --- 龔文的取法 --- p.174 / Chapter 第四章 --- 龔自珍的诗　 --- p.207 / Chapter （甲） --- 龔自珍的戒诗 --- p.207 / Chapter （乙） --- 龔诗的思想內容 --- p.214 / Chapter （一） --- 己亥以前的诗 --- p.215 / Chapter （二） --- 己亥雜诗 --- p.251 / Chapter a.1 --- 序言 --- p.253 / Chapter b.1 --- 出京沿途所见　 --- p.253 / Chapter c.1 --- 濶別朋友 --- p.257 / Chapter d.1 --- 在仕途上的一個縮影 --- p.259 / Chapter e.1 --- 概述平生之學 --- p.262 / Chapter f.1 --- 途中雜感 --- p.265 / Chapter g.1 --- 返抵家鄉後的生活 --- p.270 / Chapter r.1 --- 记述再度北上 --- p.273 / Chapter i.1 --- 結语 --- p.276 / Chapter （丙） --- 龔诗的風格 --- p.277 / Chapter （丁） --- 龔诗的取法 --- p.285 / Chapter （戊） --- 龔诗的技巧　 --- p.312 / Chapter 第五章 --- 龔自珍的词　 --- p.324 / Chapter （甲） --- 長短言自序 --- p.325 / Chapter （乙） --- 龔词的情感 --- p.330 / Chapter （丙） --- 龔词的風格 --- p.344 / Chapter （丁） --- 龔词的藝術特色 --- p.357 / Chapter 第六章 --- 龔自珍的影響 --- p.367 / Chapter （甲） --- 康有為　 --- p.368 / Chapter （乙） --- 張炳麟 --- p.390 / Chapter （丙） --- 黃遵憲 --- p.413 / Chapter （丁） --- 南社 --- p.433 / Chapter （戊） --- 其他 --- p.452 / Chapter （己） --- 結論 --- p.460 / 附錄：參考書目

Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries

No description available.

by Paul Tseng. / Caption title. "July 1988." / Includes bibliographical references. / Work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant NSF-ECS-8519058 Work supported by the Army Research Office under grant DAAL03-86-K-0171

This study of the views of Edward Irving on the person and work of Jesus Christ has been long delayed in its preparation. It is to be hoped that the time which has elapsed since its inception has served a beneficent purpose. It was Charles Darwin who wrote of one of his books, long postponed: "The delay in this case, as with all my other books, has been a great advantage to me; for a man after a long interval can criticise his own work, almost as well as it were that of another person." For material on which this study is based takes in the full range from the coarse venom of the London pamphleteer to the strong words of Thomas Carlyle. Irving himself wrote volume after volume, and the student is almost embarrassed by the material from the pen of this eccentric preacher. Whole sections of this first-hand material dealing with subjects prophetical were passed by as irrelevant to the theme. The "Life" by Mrs. Oliphant is most readable and gives an attractive picture of the hero. But the sentimentalism of the book casts a shade upon its historical value, and the student is thrown back on accounts of the life which, though less complete, were written shortly after his time.

Mémoire de Maîtrise : Histoire : Metz : 1981. / Mémoire de Maîtrise soutenu sur ensemble de travaux. Bibliogr. f. 161-165.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Heretofore in the western world there has been no intensive literary study of the noted Russian author of the eighteenth century, Denis Ivanovich Fonvizin. Many western scholars assert that Fonvizin's works are valuable only as historical documents and that they possess little literary merit. Nevertheless, a close acquaintance with Fonvizin's works and a careful scrutiny of the information about them, help to put his works in a proper perspective. To perform this task I have consulted many Soviet and pre-revolutionary sources and shall report their findings along with mine. The method of approach has been to analyze the works and the available critical literature. Chapter One is devoted to a general study of the author and his career. Chapters Two and Three deal with Fonvizin's most important literary legacies Brlgadir and Nedorosl' respectively, and provide analyses of sources, structure, characterization, style, language, humour and influences. I have commented in particular on the characters as manifestations of their class in Russian society of the time and attempted to provide an insight into the plays' social meaning and use of humorous devices. The Epilogue consists of a brief summary in an attempt at formulating a conclusion about Fonvizin's place in the literary history of Russia. / Arts, Faculty of / Central Eastern Northern European Studies, Department of / Graduate