Major National Health Service policies in the United Kingdom (UK) have promoted the development of shared learning as part of pre-qualifying education for health and social care (H&SC) professionals, to foster effective collaborative working for the benefit of patient/client care. Subsequently, the wide-spread introduction of interprofessional education (IPE) initiatives has been accompanied by numerous research studies and evaluations. IPE delivery is diverse; initiatives are frequently located in academic settings and thereby attract criticism for being too remote from the realities of professional practice, whereas practice-based IPE is generally well- evaluated but can be fraught with logistical issues. Initially criticized for lacking a sound theoretical basis for either its development or research, the number of I PE papers drawing on theories from different fields such as psychology and education continues to grow. However, the contribution of the theories of Pierre Bourdieu as a meaningful framework for examining the complexities of IPE has received little attention. This study explores a range of factors influencing the development and delivery of IPE initiatives in three universities in England. It is an original enquiry into a particular form of practice: of people who occupy different positions within the same social space, and in relation to those in other institutions with similar responsibilities. In-depth interviews were conducted with nineteen academic staff associated with IPE curriculum development - an under-investigated area to date. In addition, the extent and nature of IPE in the UK was scoped utilizing publicly available, on-line data, as part of the contextualization of the study and to further an understanding of the broader field of H&SC professional education within which IPE is located. Related learning, teaching and strategy documentation in the participating institutions was also analysed. A rigorously reflexive approach was maintained, with Bourdieu's concepts employed as methodological strategies (influencing study design, contextualization and interview schedules) and as analytical devices. Issues of power are explored using Bourdieu's concepts of field, habitus and capital, shedding light on what facilitates or hinders pre-qualifying IPE from the staff perspective. The study shows that Bourdieu's concepts provide a robust framework for underpinning the development of, and research into, H&SC IPE, thereby contributing to an on-going important debate in relation to IPE theory.

No description available.

No description available.

The University of South Africa (Unisa) as comprehensive open distance learning institution (ODL institution) in South Africa is fulfilling a critical social mandate to serve people who would otherwise not have access to education, either for financial reasons, being employed, living in remote areas, or because they cannot access residential universities owing to disability (Unisa, 2008[a]: 15). In facilitating the entrée of the previously identified groups into tertiary education, Unisa has an open admission policy where students mostly have unlimited access to the system. The policy aims to cross the time, geographical, economic, social, educational, and communication distance between students, academics, courseware, and their peers and to accommodate these prospective students from diverse backgrounds (Unisa, 2008: 2). Unisa’s self-evaluation portfolio for the Commonwealth Audit during 2008 mentioned that this policy leads to the revolving door syndrome where students have unlimited access to the system but then often without success (Unisa, 2008[a]: 27). Open access poses a challenge for the training of student social workers within an ODL context. The Department of Social Work at Unisa, currently trains 70% of all social workers in South Africa (Department of Social Work - Unisa, 2008: 5). Coupled with the former, is the fact that Unisa is regarded in the tertiary landscape of South Africa as the most affordable university with the result that it attracts large number of students who have come straight from school (Kilfoil cited in Schenck, 2009: 299). In coping with the large student numbers the Department of Social Work at Unisa is challenged, apart from addressing the theoretical social work programme, to also meet the practical work requirements as set out by the Standard Generating Body of Social Work, in that it needs to provide practical placements for students to conduct their social work practical work training in completion of their Bachelor’s degree in Social Work (BSW) (Lawlor, 2008: 19). The current state of affairs is that the numbers of students requiring practical placements for social work practical work training outnumber the number of practical placements available. In responding to and addressing these challenges, the Bright Site of Sunnyside Service-learning Centre (hereafter called “Bright Site” or the Bright Site”) was established in October 2008 as a strategic project by Unisa’s Department of Social Work. The Bright Site was developed in accordance with the service-learning model proposed by the Council for Higher Education (CHE) with the emphasis on service through learning, and learning through service (Department of Social Work Unisa, 2008:6). / Social Work / M.A. (Social Science)

The University of South Africa (Unisa) as comprehensive open distance learning institution (ODL institution) in South Africa is fulfilling a critical social mandate to serve people who would otherwise not have access to education, either for financial reasons, being employed, living in remote areas, or because they cannot access residential universities owing to disability (Unisa, 2008[a]: 15). In facilitating the entrée of the previously identified groups into tertiary education, Unisa has an open admission policy where students mostly have unlimited access to the system. The policy aims to cross the time, geographical, economic, social, educational, and communication distance between students, academics, courseware, and their peers and to accommodate these prospective students from diverse backgrounds (Unisa, 2008: 2). Unisa’s self-evaluation portfolio for the Commonwealth Audit during 2008 mentioned that this policy leads to the revolving door syndrome where students have unlimited access to the system but then often without success (Unisa, 2008[a]: 27). Open access poses a challenge for the training of student social workers within an ODL context. The Department of Social Work at Unisa, currently trains 70% of all social workers in South Africa (Department of Social Work - Unisa, 2008: 5). Coupled with the former, is the fact that Unisa is regarded in the tertiary landscape of South Africa as the most affordable university with the result that it attracts large number of students who have come straight from school (Kilfoil cited in Schenck, 2009: 299). In coping with the large student numbers the Department of Social Work at Unisa is challenged, apart from addressing the theoretical social work programme, to also meet the practical work requirements as set out by the Standard Generating Body of Social Work, in that it needs to provide practical placements for students to conduct their social work practical work training in completion of their Bachelor’s degree in Social Work (BSW) (Lawlor, 2008: 19). The current state of affairs is that the numbers of students requiring practical placements for social work practical work training outnumber the number of practical placements available. In responding to and addressing these challenges, the Bright Site of Sunnyside Service-learning Centre (hereafter called “Bright Site” or the Bright Site”) was established in October 2008 as a strategic project by Unisa’s Department of Social Work. The Bright Site was developed in accordance with the service-learning model proposed by the Council for Higher Education (CHE) with the emphasis on service through learning, and learning through service (Department of Social Work Unisa, 2008:6). / Social Work / M.A. (Social Science)