With the advancements in acquisition and processing of seismic reflection data recorded over crystalline rocks, building three-dimensional geologic models becomes increasingly favorable. Because of little available petrophysical data, interpretations of seismic reflection data in hardrock terrains are often speculative. Potential field data modeling are sometimes performed in order to reduce the ambiguity of seismic reflection interpretations. The Kristineberg mining area in the western part of the Paleoproterozoic Skellefte Ore District was chosen to construct a pilot three-dimensional geologic model in an attempt to understand the crustal architecture in the region and how the major mineral systems operated in this architecture. To contribute to this aim, two parallel seismic reflection profiles were acquired in 2003 and processed to 20 sec with special attention to the top 4 sec of data. Several reflections were imaged and interpreted by the aid of reflector modeling, borehole data, 2.5D and 3D potential field modeling, and geological observations. Interpretations are informative at the crustal scale and help to construct a three-dimensional geologic model of the Kristineberg mining area. The three-dimensional geologic model covers an area of 30×30 km2 down to a depth of 12 km. The integrations help to interpret a structural basement to the Skellefte volcanic rocks, possibly with Bothnian Basin metasedimentary affinity. The contact is a shear-zone that separates the two units, generating large fold structures, which can be observed in the region. The interpretations help to divide the Revsund granitic rocks into two major groups based on their present shape and thickness. A large gravity low in the south is best represented by the intrusion of thick dome of Revsund granite. In the north, the low-gravity corresponds to the intrusion of sheet-like Revsund granites. In general, the structure associated with the Skellefte volcanics and the overlying metasedimentary rocks are two thrusts exposing the Skellefte volcanic rocks in the cores of hanging wall anticlinal structures. Lack of coherent reflectivity in the seismic reflection data may be due to complex faulting and folding systems observed in the Skellefte volcanics. Ultramafic sills within the metasedimentary rocks are interpreted to extend down to depths of about 5-6 km. The interpretations are helpful for targeting new VHMS deposits and areas with gold potential. For VHMS deposits, these are situated in the southern limb of a local synformal structure south of the Kristineberg mine, on the contact between the Revsund granite and the Skellefte volcanic rocks. A combination of metasedimentary and mafic-ultramafic rocks are highly gold prospective in the west, similar to observations elsewhere in the region. There are still questions that remain unanswered and need more work. New data in the study area will help to answer questions related to e.g., an enigmatic diffraction seismic signal in Profile 5 and the structural relationship between the Skellefte volcanic rocks and the Malå volcanics. Although the derived 3D geologic model is preliminary and constructed at the crustal scale, it provides useful information to better understand the tectonic evolution of the Kristineberg mining area.

<p>With the advancements in acquisition and processing of seismic reflection data recorded over crystalline rocks, building three-dimensional geologic models becomes increasingly favorable. Because of little available petrophysical data, interpretations of seismic reflection data in hardrock terrains are often speculative. Potential field data modeling are sometimes performed in order to reduce the ambiguity of seismic reflection interpretations. The Kristineberg mining area in the western part of the Paleoproterozoic Skellefte Ore District was chosen to construct a pilot three-dimensional geologic model in an attempt to understand the crustal architecture in the region and how the major mineral systems operated in this architecture. To contribute to this aim, two parallel seismic reflection profiles were acquired in 2003 and processed to 20 sec with special attention to the top 4 sec of data. Several reflections were imaged and interpreted by the aid of reflector modeling, borehole data, 2.5D and 3D potential field modeling, and geological observations. Interpretations are informative at the crustal scale and help to construct a three-dimensional geologic model of the Kristineberg mining area. The three-dimensional geologic model covers an area of 30×30 km² down to a depth of 12 km. The integrations help to interpret a structural basement to the Skellefte volcanic rocks, possibly with Bothnian Basin metasedimentary affinity. The contact is a shear-zone that separates the two units, generating large fold structures, which can be observed in the region. The interpretations help to divide the Revsund granitic rocks into two major groups based on their present shape and thickness. A large gravity low in the south is best represented by the intrusion of thick dome of Revsund granite. In the north, the low-gravity corresponds to the intrusion of sheet-like Revsund granites. In general, the structure associated with the Skellefte volcanics and the overlying metasedimentary rocks are two thrusts exposing the Skellefte volcanic rocks in the cores of hanging wall anticlinal structures. Lack of coherent reflectivity in the seismic reflection data may be due to complex faulting and folding systems observed in the Skellefte volcanics. Ultramafic sills within the metasedimentary rocks are interpreted to extend down to depths of about 5-6 km. The interpretations are helpful for targeting new VHMS deposits and areas with gold potential. For VHMS deposits, these are situated in the southern limb of a local synformal structure south of the Kristineberg mine, on the contact between the Revsund granite and the Skellefte volcanic rocks. A combination of metasedimentary and mafic-ultramafic rocks are highly gold prospective in the west, similar to observations elsewhere in the region. There are still questions that remain unanswered and need more work. New data in the study area will help to answer questions related to e.g., an enigmatic diffraction seismic signal in Profile 5 and the structural relationship between the Skellefte volcanic rocks and the Malå volcanics. Although the derived 3D geologic model is preliminary and constructed at the crustal scale, it provides useful information to better understand the tectonic evolution of the Kristineberg mining area. </p>