1 |
Evaluation of serum and urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin beta, urinary beta core fragment and amino terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen in the clinical management of prostate cancerOtite, Ugo January 2004 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Substrate and redox partner interactions with CYP17O'Donnell, Emily January 2006 (has links)
No description available.
|
3 |
Design and synthesis of novel inhibitors of Tip60 histone acetyl-transferaseHartness, Marion Elizabeth January 2006 (has links)
No description available.
|
4 |
Characterisation of Interleukin-8 signalling in prostate cancer and relevance to progression and chemoresistanceMurphy, Catherine Rose-Anne January 2005 (has links)
No description available.
|
5 |
Identifying potential markers and targets for therapy in testicular germ cell tumours of adolescents and adultsMcIntyre, Alan Joseph January 2006 (has links)
No description available.
|
6 |
The development of novel immunotherapy strategies for prostate cancerParkinson, Richard John January 2005 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
Combinatorial chemoprevention of prostate cancerRatan, Hari Lakshmi January 2004 (has links)
Improved understanding of the molecular biology of prostate cancer has lead to the identification and development of a number of agents which may be well suited to the task of chemoprevention. In the work described here, two novel agents, resveratrol and gefitinib, have been evaluated for their anticancer effects using in vitro and in vivo models of prostate cancer. Specifically, the hypothesis that these two agents can act synergistically to achieve a greater antineoplastic effect has been tested. Resveratrol is a diet-derived naturally-occurring polyphenol which displays anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Gefitinib (ZD1839. "Iressa", AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals) is a small molecule inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase. EGFR is increasingly implicated in prostatic carcinogenesis. The results presented here demonstrate that both resveratrol and gefitinib inhibit the proliferation of hormone-sensitive and hormone-resistant cells in vitro, although there was no synergy between these two compounds. Both compounds modulate cell cycle kinetics causing arrest in various phases of the cycle. Gefitinib was shown to effectively abrogate EGFR phosphorylation in prostate cancer cell lines. No effect of resveratrol on oxidative DNA damage in prostate cancer cells was observed and its effects on COX-2 expression could not be evaluated. Gefitinib potently inhibited the development of DU145 xenografts in a nude mouse model of prostate cancer. No significant effect of resveratrol could be seen in the same mouse model. These results suggest that gefitinib may well have a role to play in the chemotherapy and chemoprevention of prostate cancer. Despite its potent in vitro antiproliferative effects, further in vivo evaluation of resveratrol is required prior to its use alone or in combination with other agents can be recommended in prostate cancer.
|
8 |
Novel strategies to enhance androgen receptor-targeted therapy in prostate cancer : a molecular and pharmacological appraoachMcCourt, Clare Margaret January 2012 (has links)
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the U.K. and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men in the Western world. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), for example the anti-androgen bicalutamide, is the cornerstone treatment for prostate cancer, including advanced disease. Resistance to anti-androgens is a major impediment to the effective treatment of prostate cancer and a key contributor to the development of a castrate-resistant phenotype. Elucidating the underlying aberrant signalling pathways leading to bicalutamide resistance are necessary to design and develop novel treatment strategies that enhance the efficacy of bicalutamide and delay the emergence of castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The chemokine IL-8 IS over-expressed in prostate cancer and has been implicated in the tumourigensis, angiogenesis and metastasis of disease. Ligand- independent activation of the AR by growth factors and chemokines is a key pathway by which prostate cancer cells can survive and flourish following ADT. We have previously reported that IL-8 can activate the AR, independent of androgen binding, leading to the downstream transcription of AR-related pro-survival and anti- apoptotic genes. In the current study, we have shown that IL-8 can induce the expression of an anti-apoptotic AR-regulated gene c-FLIP; in so doing, the regulation of c-FLIP may maintain the survival of prostate cancer cells and progression of disease. Increased expression and activity of AR co-activators is another principle pathway leading to the development of CRPC and we have shown that IL-8 can up- regulate the expression of the AR co-activator β-catenin, upstream of c-FLIP. Our data suggests that co-operation between the AR and β-catenin, following IL-8 stimulation, enhances the expression of c-FLIP. Over-expression of c-FLIP in human prostate cancer is responsible for survival and anti-apoptosis. In the current study, we have shown that molecular and pharmacological targeting of c-FLIP can enhance the efficacy of bicalutamide and is potentially an effective treatment modality for prostate cancer to delay the onset of castrate resistance. In an initial series of experiments, siRNA-mediated silencing of c-FLIP, not only resulted in apoptosis but sensitised prostate cancer cells to bicalutamide- induced apoptosis. Due to the limitations of RNAi-based therapies in the clinic; we exploited the use of several small molecules that decrease c-FLIP expression. The . HDACi droxinostat and SAHA, down-regulated c-FLIP and induced apoptosis in both the androgen-dependent cell lines tested. Additionally, pre-treatment with either HDACi sensitised cells to bicalutamide and further decreased c-FLIP expression. We extended our studies using SAHA as this HDACi has received regulatory approval for the treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma and clinically relevant doses were able to induce apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. The combination of SAHA and bicalutamide resulted in significant apoptosis through the down-regulation of several anti-apoptotic and pro-survival regulators. In further experiments, our findings suggest cell-specific regulation of c-FLIP in drug response relating to the relative basal activities and status of the AR and NF-KB transcription factors between 22RVl and LNCaP cells. We propose that SAHA and bicalutamide is a clinically relevant treatment strategy for the regression of 22RVl- and LNCaP- like human prostate tumours as a means to circumvent bicalutamide resistance and delay the onset of advanced CRPC. To determine the potential clinical benefit of treating prostate cancer patients with SAHA and bicalutamide, we broadened our investigations using the VCaP androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cell line, representative of castrate-resistant metastatic tumour cells that possess a hyper-activated AR. We identified that VCaP cells are intrinsically resistant to SAHA-induced apoptosis and that this may be associated with increased basal expression of c-FLIP and BCL-2 in this cell line (relative to 22RVl and LNCaP cells) and the inability of SAHA to down-regulate the expression of these anti-apoptotic proteins. Additionally, no sensitisation to bicalutamide was observed in VCaP cells and SAHA induced the transcriptional activity of the AR and NF-KB transcription factors. In summary, our findings generated using VCaP cells suggest that the combination of SAHA and bicalutamide would not be a valuable treatment modality to use in metastatic castrate-resistant patients and may cause disease progression as a result of SAHA-induced activation of transcription factors. We propose that SAHA and bicalutamide is a potentially effective treatment post-radiation or post-radical prostatectomy to delay the development of an advanced castrate-resistant phenotype.
|
9 |
Targeting the DNA double strand break repair machinery in prostate cancerShaheen, Fadhel Sulaiman January 2009 (has links)
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in males in western societies. In spite of the successful first line treatment using surgery, radiation therapy, antiandrogen treatment or combination therapy the disease progresses towards a hormone refractory state where the only effective treatment is chemotherapy which prolongs overall survival, however it is not curative. The resistance that hormone refractory disease displays highlights the importance of developing new targeted therapies which may be curative or at least may improve the patient's quality of life and overall survival. Current chemotherapeutic regimens used in prostate cancer treatment mostly contain agents that induce DNA damage and specifically double strand breaks, such as Doxorubicin, mitoxantrone and etoposide.
|
10 |
Examining the consequence of targeting mircotubules in prostate cancerStockley, Jacqueline January 2008 (has links)
Prostate Cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in males in the UK. Whilst localised disease can be treated by surgery or radiotherapy (Labrie, 2007; Walsh, 2002) patients presenting with clinically apparent prostate cancer often have metastatic disease. Androgen ablation is the first line treatment for metastatic prostate cancer however, although the disease initially responds to androgen withdrawal almost all patients relapse after a median period of approximately 2 years and become castrate resistant (Tomioka et al., 2007). Docetaxel is currently the only drug which has been found to extend survival in these patients (Petrylak et al., 2004; Tannock et al., 2004). With the development of life extending microtubule targeting agents, including Docetaxel (Di Lorenzo et al., 2007) it has become necessary to investigate the effect of androgen ablation on the new regimens. In this study the consequence of targeting the microtubules with Docetaxel in prostate cancer is investigated, including how this interacts with current therapeutic regimes.
|
Page generated in 0.0366 seconds