This dissertation is a study of how woodworking in ancient Egypt developed in the 19th and 20th dynasties. To establish the range of wooden furniture manufactured during this period, a detailed survey of furniture depicted in Ramesside Theban and Memphite tombs (appendices A, B and F) has been undertaken. These furniture forms are compared with ancient sketches of furniture that are annotated with a range of signs and marks found on a collection of "furniture ostraca" discovered at Deir el-Medina (chapter 1). In order to address the question of whether a generic design canon was used for furniture throughout Ramesside Egypt, the occupational use of wooden products by the inhabitants of Gurob is compared with those used at Deir el-Medina (chapter 2). The quality of woodworking and the skill level of Ramesside carpenters is also analysed through study of their expertise in manufacturing a range of different forms of coffm construction and other large pieces of funerary equipment including tomb doors and protective statues (chapter 3). Discernible changes in the design and usage of Ramesside furniture, when compared with those used in the 18th Dynasty, are examined both tirrOtigh study of extant pieces of furniture and via analysis of the pictorial repertoire of furniture depicted in Ramesside private tombs (chapter 4). Depictions of furniture used by the elite class in the reign of Rameses III are studied both in the royal tomb (KVll) and the royal mortuary temple at Medinet Habu, leading on to discussion of the question of how these representations of royal furniture may have been used as symbolic tools to promote the Ramesside empire at the edges of its sphere of influence (chapter 5).

No description available.

No description available.

by S. K. Leung-Yan-Cheong. / Bibliography: leaf 12. / NSF Grants GK-33250 and Eng-10173, AFOSR Contract F44620-73-C-0065, Grant ONR/N0014-75-C-1183 and NSF/ENC-76-24447.

No description available.

by Robert C. Merton. / Presented at the American Finance Association Meeting, New York, December 1973. / Bibliography: leaf [26]

Utvecklingen i praxis på kombinationsfullmaktens område visar att ställningsfullmakten i 10 § 2 st. AvtL inte fullt ut kunnat tillvarata tredje mans intresse på ett önskvärt sätt. Bestämmelsen har framförallt visat sig vara otillräcklig i de fall rättshandlingar företagits på högre hierarkisk nivå genom att det sällan hinner utvecklas någon sedvänja för sådant rättshandlande. Andra omständigheter i kombination med varandra har då ansetts kunna ersätta sedvanerekvisitet i 10 § 2 st. AvtL. Avgörande har varit om tredje man genom dessa omständigheter fått ett befogat intryck av mellanmannens behörighet. Rättsfiguren som kommit att kallas kombinationsfullmakt har präglat praxis enda fram till idag. I och med NJA 2013 s. 659 och NJA 2014 s. 684 har rättsfiguren dock fått en klarare struktur med en tydlig metod för hur prövningen av tredje mans befogade tillit ska ske. Metoden uppställer ett tydligt härrörandekrav och tillitskrav. Därtill uppställer HD i 2014 års fall ett krav på insikt hos huvudmannen, som innebär att han inte blir bunden om han inte måst inse att de omständigheter som härrör från honom kan ge tredje man det befogade intrycket av behörighet. Samtidigt har begreppet kombinationsfullmakt ersatts av tillitsfullmakten. Övergången till tillitsfullmakten torde inte innebära att den rättsfigur kombinationsfullmakten bygger på ändras nämnvärt. Dock synes det nya begreppet innefatta även överväganden som normalt sett faller inom toleransfullmakten.

Yang Lu, Louise. / "Architecture Department, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Master of Architecture Programme 2009-2010, design report." / "May 2010." / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 55).

陳頌文. / "2002年8月". / 論文 (哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2002. / 參考文獻 (leaves 127-133) / 附中英文摘要. / "2002 nian 8 yue". / Chen Songwen. / Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2002. / Can kao wen xian (leaves 127-133) / Fu Zhong Ying wen zhai yao. / Chapter 第一章 --- 文學史和文學批評史上的初唐四傑 --- p.1 / Chapter 第一節 --- 問題的提出 --- p.1 / Chapter 第二節 --- 「四傑」名稱的由來 --- p.2 / Chapter 第三節 --- 文學史上的「四傑」 --- p.7 / Chapter 第四節 --- 文學批評史上的「四傑」 --- p.8 / Chapter 第二章 --- 貞觀至武周文學背景和文學思想發展 --- p.11 / Chapter 第一節 --- 緒論 --- p.11 / Chapter 第二節 --- 貞觀年間朝廷的文學宣言 --- p.12 / Chapter (1) --- 貞觀年間君臣論文的性質 --- p.12 / Chapter (2) --- 貞觀年間朝廷的文學思想´ؤ´ؤ以史家文論爲主 --- p.15 / Chapter (2.1) --- 史家對六朝文學的評價與總結 --- p.15 / Chapter (2.2) --- 史家論文的空間 --- p.17 / Chapter (2.3) --- 史家文論的意義 --- p.19 / Chapter 第三節 --- 貞觀至武周的文學硏究槪況 --- p.21 / Chapter (1) --- 類書和總集 --- p.21 / Chapter (2) --- 《文選》硏究 --- p.24 / Chapter (3) --- 詩學硏究 --- p.25 / Chapter (3.1) --- 上官儀 --- p.25 / Chapter (3.2) --- 元兢 --- p.27 / Chapter (3.3) --- 崔融 --- p.28 / Chapter 第四節 --- 貞觀至武周文人干求與入仕情況 --- p.29 / Chapter (1) --- 以文章進身的問題 --- p.30 / Chapter (2) --- 以文章進用的大臣仕途之升降 --- p.32 / Chapter (3) --- 王府的文學風氣 --- p.34 / Chapter 第三章 --- 王勃文學思想析論 --- p.35 / Chapter 第一節 --- 緒論´ؤ´ؤ王勃生平及著作槪述 --- p.35 / Chapter 第二節 --- 可供考察文學思想的篇章背景分析 --- p.36 / Chapter (1) --- 〈平臺秘略論 〉、〈平臺秘略贊〉：王府修撰的意見 --- p.36 / Chapter (2) --- 〈上吏部裴侍郎啓〉：參選士子的意見 --- p.37 / Chapter (3) --- 詩賦序文之言論：翰墨之客的意見 --- p.39 / Chapter 第三節 --- 文論文本分析 --- p.40 / Chapter (1) --- 文學的性質與功用 --- p.40 / Chapter (1.1) --- 「甄明大義，矯正末流」、「緣情體物」與「詩以見志」 --- p.40 / Chapter (1.2) --- 文學與王府 --- p.43 / Chapter (1.3) --- 文學與自然 --- p.44 / Chapter (2) --- 對文學作品的要求及規範 --- p.45 / Chapter (2.1) --- 「氣陵雲漢，字挾風霜」辨 --- p.45 / Chapter (2.2) --- 「甄明大義，矯正末流」辨 --- p.48 / Chapter (3) --- 對歷代文學的評價 --- p.53 / Chapter (4) --- 寫作態度 --- p.56 / Chapter (5) --- 小結 --- p.59 / Chapter 第四節 --- 王通與王勃 --- p.60 / Chapter 第四章 --- 楊炯文學思想析論 --- p.64 / Chapter 第一節 --- 緒論´ؤ´ؤ楊炯生平及著作槪述 --- p.64 / Chapter 第二節 --- 〈王勃集序〉析論 --- p.64 / Chapter (1) --- 〈王勃集序〉的寫作時間 --- p.65 / Chapter (2) --- 〈王勃集序〉的內容分析 --- p.68 / Chapter (2.1) --- 〈王勃集序〉與王勃文學變革 --- p.69 / Chapter (2.1.1) --- 從「龍朔變體」看王勃文學變革的對象 --- p.69 / Chapter (2.1.2) --- 從王勃之志看王勃文學變革的可能性 --- p.72 / Chapter (2.1.3) --- 〈王勃集序〉對王勃硏究的參考價値 --- p.75 / Chapter (2.1.4) --- 小結 --- p.76 / Chapter 第三節 --- 楊炯的文學思想 --- p.76 / Chapter (1) --- 文學的性質及作用 --- p.76 / Chapter (1.1) --- 文學與禮樂 --- p.76 / Chapter (1.2) --- 文學與抒情酬唱 --- p.77 / Chapter (2) --- 對文學的要求與規範 --- p.77 / Chapter (3) --- 對歷代文學的批評 --- p.79 / Chapter (3.1) --- 唐以前的文學 --- p.79 / Chapter (3.2) --- 隋唐以來的文學 --- p.80 / Chapter (4) --- 小結 --- p.82 / Chapter 第五章 --- 盧照鄰文學思想析論 --- p.83 / Chapter 第一節 --- 緒論´ؤ´ؤ盧照鄰生平及著作槪述 --- p.83 / Chapter 第二節 --- 可供考察文學思想的篇章背景分析 --- p.84 / Chapter (1) --- 〈駙馬都尉喬君集序〉 --- p.84 / Chapter (2) --- 〈南陽公集序〉 --- p.84 / Chapter (3) --- 〈樂府詩集序〉 --- p.86 / Chapter 第三節 --- 文本分析 --- p.88 / Chapter (1) --- 文學的性質與功用 --- p.88 / Chapter (1.1) --- 文學與政治 --- p.88 / Chapter (1.2) --- 「安可默而無述」 --- p.89 / Chapter (2) --- 對文學作品的要求和規範 --- p.90 / Chapter (2.1) --- 「立體不拘於一塗」 --- p.90 / Chapter (2.2) --- 「聽歌曲而知亡」 --- p.93 / Chapter (2.3) --- 「妙諧鐘律」 --- p.94 / Chapter (3) --- 對歷代文學的評價 --- p.96 / Chapter (3.1) --- 對唐以前文學的評價和態度 --- p.96 / Chapter (3.1.1) --- 〈雅〉、〈頌〉 --- p.96 / Chapter (3.1.2) --- 屈宋 --- p.97 / Chapter (3.1.3) --- 兩漢 --- p.99 / Chapter (3.1.4) --- 魏晉 --- p.99 / Chapter (3.1.5) --- 南朝 --- p.100 / Chapter (3.2) --- 對貞觀文臣的批評 --- p.101 / Chapter (3.3) --- 對古今文士評論文學的意見 --- p.102 / Chapter (4) --- 創作態度 --- p.102 / Chapter (5) --- 小結 --- p.104 / Chapter 第六章 --- 駱賓王文學思想析論 --- p.105 / Chapter 第一節 --- 緒論´ؤ´ؤ駱賓王生平及著作槪述 --- p.105 / Chapter 第二節 --- 可供考察文學思想的篇章背景分析 --- p.106 / Chapter (1) --- 上長官書信 --- p.106 / Chapter (1.1) --- 〈和道王閨情詩啓〉 --- p.106 / Chapter (1.2) --- 〈上吏部裴侍郎書〉、〈上吏部侍郎帝京篇序〉 --- p.106 / Chapter (1.3) --- 〈與程將軍書〉 --- p.107 / Chapter (2) --- 飲宴酬唱之作 --- p.108 / Chapter (3) --- 個人抒懷之作 --- p.108 / Chapter 第三節 --- 文論內容分析 --- p.109 / Chapter (1) --- 文學的性質及功用 --- p.109 / Chapter (1.1) --- 事、物、情與文 --- p.109 / Chapter (1.2) --- 文學與求仕 --- p.111 / Chapter (2) --- 對文學的要求及規範：雅與俗的取捨問題 --- p.113 / Chapter (3) --- 對歷代文學的評價 --- p.115 / Chapter (3.1) --- 兩漢以前 --- p.115 / Chapter (3.2) --- 兩漢 --- p.117 / Chapter (3.3) --- 魏晉 --- p.117 / Chapter (3.4) --- 南朝 --- p.118 / Chapter (4) --- 小結 --- p.118 / Chapter 第七章 --- 總結 --- p.120 / 參考書目 --- p.127 / 附錄一 --- p.132