This thesis examines the treatment of death ritual, burial practice and the afterlife in the corpus of Latin elegy, in the light of what can be provisionally reconstructed of contemporary Roman customs and attitudes regarding death and commemoration. Through close readings of particular passages from Propertius, Tibullus, Ovid and ‘Lygdamus’, certain general tendencies in the elegists’ descriptions of their own and other characters’ demises are identified and set within the context of the genre’s overall development. In this way, the poets’ use of material relating to death, burial and beyond is shown to be an indispensable vehicle for their literary, social and political self-definition. After an introduction reflecting on previous scholarly approaches to the subject and discussing some possible explanations for the popularity of the death motif in elegy, the first main chapter deals with elegiac explorations of the afterlife, setting the elegists’ accounts of their own and others’ posthumous activity in the underworld against ways of visualising the hereafter current at the time. Beginning with Tibullus’ influential and innovatory diptych at 1.3.57-82, we see visions of the next world used programmatically to define and reinforce the earthy ‘life of love’. The next chapter considers the theme of the funeral, in which the elegists’ presentations of their preferred <i>pompae</i> are read as a distillation of their distinctive themes and terminology; in many cases, the details of a character’s funeral reflect and reward his or her performance on the stage of elegy. The final section, devoted to elegiac tombs, analyses the site, form and treatment desired by the poets’ <i>personae</i> for their monuments (and those of other characters), comparing evidence from surviving Roman memorials and inscriptions. Points of particular interest include scenes of shipwreck and the notion of the sea as tomb, and elegiac epitaphs, which crystallise the essential elements of the lover-poet’s experience into memorable lapidary formulae. A brief epilogue summarises the study’s wider implications for the process of elegiac self-fashioning.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Roman emperors, the details of their lives and reigns, their triumphs and failures and their representation in our sources are all subjects which have never failed to attract scholarly attention. Therefore, in view of the resurgence of scholarly interest in ancient magic in the last few decades, it is curious that there is to date no comprehensive treatment of the subject of the frequent connection of many Roman emperors with magicians and magical practices in ancient literature. The aim of the present study is to explore the association of Roman emperors with magic and magicians, as presented in our sources. This study explores the twofold nature of this association, namely whether certain emperors are represented as magicians themselves and employers of magicians or whether they are represented as victims and persecutors of magic; furthermore, it attempts to explore the implications of such associations in respect of the nature and the motivations of our sources. The case studies of emperors are limited to the period from the establishment of the Principate up to the end of the Severan dynasty, culminating in the short reign of Elagabalus. The late Republican background of magic will also be explored as an introduction, since it is important to the understanding of the connection of emperors and magic in our imperial sources.

No description available.

No description available.