1 |
Communication-satisfaction of educators and administrators of Adult Migrant Education Program within and between institutions in the ACTSutherland, Susan Saubhag W., n/a January 1984 (has links)
The purpose of this study was to investigate the level of
communication-satisfaction within and between institutions that are
responsible for the administration of AMEP in the ACT. These
institutions are:
The TAFE Colleges
Office of ACT Further Education and
The Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs.
Data were collected from the educators and administrators.
Two questions were addressed and four hypotheses were tested, which
addressed themselves to the following aspects of communication:
corporate perspective
personal feedback
organizational integration
relation with supervisor
communication climate
horizontal communication
media quality
relation with subordinates.
The general conclusion drawn from the study was that the
institutions that are responsible for the administration of AMEP in
the ACT operate at different levels (i.e. policy, implementation
and operations) and experience difficulty with communication
between institutional boundaries. However, there is little
relation between the level of individual perception within and
between institutions.
|
2 |
A comparative study of the language content of employment-related units in government-funded language programs for newcomers in Canada and AustraliaZhang, Yiran 10 August 2018 (has links)
In response to the scant studies comparing the language content of the employment-related units in Australia's Adult Migrant English Program (AMEP) and Canada's Language Instruction for Newcomers to Canada (LINC) program, the present study examines the curriculum guidelines and the selected instructional materials of AMEP's Certificate in Spoken and Written English (CSWE) III and LINC level 4 and investigates four instructors' implementation of the curricula (two instructors from each program).
Through qualitatively analysis using NVivo, the results show that both LINC 4 and CSWE III exhibit strengths and limitations, and also alignment and misalignment, as compared to their theoretical frameworks. While LINC 4 covers more components in the framework, CSWE III demonstrates greater depth in implementing its theoretical foundation. Further, LINC 4 instructors mostly implement a task-based approach; the CSWE III instructors incorporate multiple approaches, while the curriculum claims text-based teaching as its main approach.
This study suggests that in teaching English for employment purposes, more content that introduces the different functions of language use and communication strategies would be beneficial, and authentic texts and learner experience can also be valuable. The incorporation of different teaching approaches may be advantageous. Future research can further examine newcomer language program outcomes by comparing language production data from learners of similar programs in different contexts, in order to evaluate the impact of language training on learners’ ability to engage in employment-purposed communication. / Graduate
|
Page generated in 0.0119 seconds