Spelling suggestions: "subject:"african units"" "subject:"frican units""
1 |
Munaẓẓamat al-Waḥdah al-Afrīqīyah min al-nāḥīyatayn al-naẓarīyah wa-al-taṭbīqīyah :dirāsah muqāranah /Muṣayliḥī, Muḥammad al-Ḥusaynī. January 1976 (has links)
Thesis--Jāmiʻat ʻAyn Shams. / "Organization of African Unity in brief": p. 845-856. In Arabic. Summary in English. Includes bibliographical references (p. 797-817).
|
2 |
Munaẓẓamat al-Waḥdah al-Afrīqīyah min al-nāḥīyatayn al-naẓarīyah wa-al-taṭbīqīyah :dirāsah muqāranah /Muṣayliḥī, Muḥammad al-Ḥusaynī. January 1976 (has links)
Thesis--Jāmiʻat ʻAyn Shams. / "Organization of African Unity in brief": p. 845-856. In Arabic. Summary in English. Includes bibliographical references (p. 797-817).
|
3 |
Doctoral thesis on the theme the Organization of African Unity and the Council of EuropeOmoh Esiemokai, Emmanuel, January 1900 (has links)
Inaug.-Diss.--Cologne. / Summary in German. Vita. Bibliography: p. 114-119.
|
4 |
OAE en menseregteNeethling, Theodor Gottlieb 06 1900 (has links)
Text in Afrikaans / In die post-koloniale tydsgewrig was die menseregte-situasie en bestaansomgewing van talle Afrikane die van konflik, korrupsie, onderdrukking, sosiale ongeregtigheid en menseslagting. As kontinentale eenheidsorganisasie het die OAE jare lank in gebreke gebly om die lot van mense in sy ledestate te verbeter. Eers teen die laat-sewentigerjare het die organisasie - hoofsaaklik as gevolg van internasionale druk - begin om werklik aan menseregte aandag te skenk. Die kulminasie hiervan was die Banjoel-handves vir menseregte in 1981. Dit is egter bekend dat die gebeure geen wesenlike verbetering en vordering in die menseregte-gesteldheid in Afrika teweeg gebring het nie. Teen hierdie agtergrond is gepoog om die geskiedenis van menseregte in Afrika en die OAE se rol hieromtrent te ontleed. Samehangend is ondersoek gedoen na die noodsaaklike elemente vir 'n menseregtebedeling
op die kontinent - soos dit in der waarheid in die Banjoel-handves ten doel gestel is. Die belangrikste bevindings is
onder meer dat
* 'n botsing tussen pan-nasionale en nasionale belange in die OAE deurgaans ten diepste veroorsaak het dat die organisasie in gebreke was om die lot van talle Afrikane te verbeter;
* die politieke bedelings en "regskultuur" van die afsonderlike Afrika-state tot dusver verhoed het dat die menseregte van die Banjoel-handves sinvol toegepas word;
* indien die OAE sy menseregte-standaarde toegepas wil sien, die Afrika-leiers in afsonderlike verband eers daarmee erns moet maak;
* gemeenskaplik aanvaarde politieke bedelings en legitieme regerings in Afrika voorwaardelik is vir die verwerkliking van die ideaal van 'n menseregte-bedeling op die kontinent.
Sedert die negentigerjare is daar egter tekens wat hoop bied op 'n verbetering in die menseregte-situasie in Afrika. Dit geld veral vir die demokratisering van etlike state en die werksaamhede van die OAE se Menseregte-kommissie. Weens verskeie redes sal die organisasie se taak ten opsigte van menseregte vorentoe egter nie maklik wees nie. Die hoop beskaam egter nie dat die OAE, hoe gering ook al, 'n bydrae kan !ewer om die bestaansomgewing van talle Afrikane te verbeter - mits 'n groter realisme daaroor in die afsonderlike ledestate posvat. / In the post-colonial era the human rights situation of many Africans was one of conflict, repression, social injustice and bloodshed. For years the OAU failed to improve the lot of people in its member states. It was only during the late seventies that the OAU - mainly as a result of international pressure - began to pay
attention to the principles of human rights. The culmination of this was the Banjul Charter of human rights in 1981. This brought about no real progress or improvement in the human rights situation in Africa, however.
Against this background an attempt has been made to analyse the history of human rights in Africa and the role of the OAU in this regard. At the same time the essential elements of a human rights dispensation on this continent - as it has in fact been envisaged by the OAU - have been investigated. The most important findings include the following:
* a clash between pan-national and national interests in the OAU was a fundamental reason why this organisation failed to improve the lot of Africans;
* the political dispensations and "legal culture" of the African states have thus far prevented the meaningful
application of the Banjul charter;
* if the OAU wishes to see its human rights standards applied, the African leaders will first have to make serious attempts to do this separately and individually;
* commonly accepted political dispensations and legitimate governments will have to be established in the OAU member states before the ideal of a human rights dispensation can become a reality in Africa. Since the nineties there have, however, been signs offering hope for an improvement in the human rights situation in Africa. This
applies in particular to the democratisation of numerous states and the activities of the OAU's Human Rights Commission. For various reasons the future task of this organisation in regard to human rights will not be easy. There is hope, however, that the OAU will be able to make some contribution, however slight, to improving the
environment of many Africans - provided a greater realism about this matter sets in the respective member states. / Political Sciences / D. Litt. et Phil. (Internasionale Politiek)
|
5 |
AN ANALYSIS OF THE ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE ORGANIZATION OF AFRICAN UNITY IN PROMOTING CONTINENTAL CO-OPERATIONSaenz, Paul, 1942- January 1968 (has links)
No description available.
|
6 |
OAU unity in diversity.Tadesse, Yilma, January 1965 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1965. / eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 66-68).
|
7 |
OAE en menseregteNeethling, Theodor Gottlieb 06 1900 (has links)
Text in Afrikaans / In die post-koloniale tydsgewrig was die menseregte-situasie en bestaansomgewing van talle Afrikane die van konflik, korrupsie, onderdrukking, sosiale ongeregtigheid en menseslagting. As kontinentale eenheidsorganisasie het die OAE jare lank in gebreke gebly om die lot van mense in sy ledestate te verbeter. Eers teen die laat-sewentigerjare het die organisasie - hoofsaaklik as gevolg van internasionale druk - begin om werklik aan menseregte aandag te skenk. Die kulminasie hiervan was die Banjoel-handves vir menseregte in 1981. Dit is egter bekend dat die gebeure geen wesenlike verbetering en vordering in die menseregte-gesteldheid in Afrika teweeg gebring het nie. Teen hierdie agtergrond is gepoog om die geskiedenis van menseregte in Afrika en die OAE se rol hieromtrent te ontleed. Samehangend is ondersoek gedoen na die noodsaaklike elemente vir 'n menseregtebedeling
op die kontinent - soos dit in der waarheid in die Banjoel-handves ten doel gestel is. Die belangrikste bevindings is
onder meer dat
* 'n botsing tussen pan-nasionale en nasionale belange in die OAE deurgaans ten diepste veroorsaak het dat die organisasie in gebreke was om die lot van talle Afrikane te verbeter;
* die politieke bedelings en "regskultuur" van die afsonderlike Afrika-state tot dusver verhoed het dat die menseregte van die Banjoel-handves sinvol toegepas word;
* indien die OAE sy menseregte-standaarde toegepas wil sien, die Afrika-leiers in afsonderlike verband eers daarmee erns moet maak;
* gemeenskaplik aanvaarde politieke bedelings en legitieme regerings in Afrika voorwaardelik is vir die verwerkliking van die ideaal van 'n menseregte-bedeling op die kontinent.
Sedert die negentigerjare is daar egter tekens wat hoop bied op 'n verbetering in die menseregte-situasie in Afrika. Dit geld veral vir die demokratisering van etlike state en die werksaamhede van die OAE se Menseregte-kommissie. Weens verskeie redes sal die organisasie se taak ten opsigte van menseregte vorentoe egter nie maklik wees nie. Die hoop beskaam egter nie dat die OAE, hoe gering ook al, 'n bydrae kan !ewer om die bestaansomgewing van talle Afrikane te verbeter - mits 'n groter realisme daaroor in die afsonderlike ledestate posvat. / In the post-colonial era the human rights situation of many Africans was one of conflict, repression, social injustice and bloodshed. For years the OAU failed to improve the lot of people in its member states. It was only during the late seventies that the OAU - mainly as a result of international pressure - began to pay
attention to the principles of human rights. The culmination of this was the Banjul Charter of human rights in 1981. This brought about no real progress or improvement in the human rights situation in Africa, however.
Against this background an attempt has been made to analyse the history of human rights in Africa and the role of the OAU in this regard. At the same time the essential elements of a human rights dispensation on this continent - as it has in fact been envisaged by the OAU - have been investigated. The most important findings include the following:
* a clash between pan-national and national interests in the OAU was a fundamental reason why this organisation failed to improve the lot of Africans;
* the political dispensations and "legal culture" of the African states have thus far prevented the meaningful
application of the Banjul charter;
* if the OAU wishes to see its human rights standards applied, the African leaders will first have to make serious attempts to do this separately and individually;
* commonly accepted political dispensations and legitimate governments will have to be established in the OAU member states before the ideal of a human rights dispensation can become a reality in Africa. Since the nineties there have, however, been signs offering hope for an improvement in the human rights situation in Africa. This
applies in particular to the democratisation of numerous states and the activities of the OAU's Human Rights Commission. For various reasons the future task of this organisation in regard to human rights will not be easy. There is hope, however, that the OAU will be able to make some contribution, however slight, to improving the
environment of many Africans - provided a greater realism about this matter sets in the respective member states. / Political Sciences / D. Litt. et Phil. (Internasionale Politiek)
|
8 |
Conflict Management of the Organization of African Unity in Intra- African Conflicts, 1963-1980Olvo, Samuel L. O. 08 1900 (has links)
The purpose of this dissertation is to examine and evaluate the role of the Organization of African Unity as an international organization in the solution of intra-African conflicts. For the purpose of this paper, eight conflicts from 1963 to 1980 were investigated. Utilizing these cases, the paper (a) examines four assumptions: (1) that regional actions promote settlements by isolating soluble local conflicts from more complex ones; (2) that intrastate conflicts are more difficult to resolve by regional organizations than interstate or border disputes; (3) that most of the boundary disputes in Africa are due to the arbitrary colonial boundary demarcations; and (4) that most of the causes of the ineffectiveness in its conflict resolution is as a result of poor administrative set-up, lack of resources, and failure of its commissions to operate effectively; (b) it answered the following questions: (1) Did the O.A.U. stop, help stop, or fail to stop the fighting; (2) Did the O.A.U. settle, help settle, or fail to settle the conflict; and (3) Was there super power intervention, and if so, to what effect? The methodology used is primarily case study method. Most attention is given to the way the O.A.U. handled the conflicts.
|
9 |
Africa's quest for unitySaenz, Paul, 1942- January 1966 (has links)
No description available.
|
10 |
The African Union and human rights : drawing from the European experience of human rights supervision, what impact might the African Union, and the consequent creation of an African court, have on Africa with regard to human rights, African unity, and the issue of state sovereignty?Bodasing, Anshal. January 2003 (has links)
The formation of the African Union (AU) holds great promise for Africa with
regard to development. It also brings a new dimension to human rights in Africa,
with the creation of the African Court. However, the OAUs legacy of human rights
supervision and the development of democracy lacks in many areas. Europe,
however, has manifested itself into an entity capable of trans-border cooperation
and has been able to sustain this over a long period of time.
What the OAU has accomplished in this regard is not compatible with the current
status of international law theory and practise. There is a need then for change in
these areas, and what better opportunity is there, than for a new dispensation in
regional governance to apply to relevant policies and programmes to effect this
change?
This dissertation will endeavour to present a study of how the European legacy in
Africa worked to the latter's detriment over the past five or six decades since
decolonisation. Yet, there are lessons that may be learnt from Europe's unification
that can be successfully implemented in Africa. Further, by analysing the
weaknesses of Africa's current system of human rights supervision, and rectifying
or reforming them, much may be accomplished in the advancement of the system.
Therefore reformation of the system will be discussed at length. However, the
success of the system will be evidenced by the commitment of its component
members.
Thus far the status quo in Africa reflects unwillingness on the part of the state to
surrender its sovereignty. This was one of the reasons for the impotence of the
OAU. Will the AU be able to overcome this condition? The onus remains on the
state to shore up their commitments to the treaties which they have ratified, and to
deliver on the promises they have made, because there are solutions, and whether
or not they are implemented ultimately depends on the AU. / Thesis (LL.M.)-University of Natal, 2003.
|
Page generated in 0.0398 seconds