Spelling suggestions: "subject:"airplanes - cockpits."" "subject:"airplanes - cockpit’s.""
1 |
Effects of displays and alerts on subject reactions to potential collisions during closely spaced parallel approachesVandor, Balazs 12 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Modeling the pilots and constructing an intent inferencer for a boeing 727 cockpitVerfurth, Serena Connor 05 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
3 |
Deactivation of automation in aircraft systems using dynamic function allocationNew, Michael Dean 05 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
4 |
The impact of culture on communications: a study on the possible effects of culture on inter-cockpitcommunicationsOgilvie, Graeme. January 1984 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Business Administration / Master / Master of Business Administration
|
5 |
Communicating pilot goals to an intelligent cockpit aiding systemCha, Woo Chang 07 October 1996 (has links)
A significant number of aircraft incidents and accidents have been caused, in part,
by flightcrew failure to properly manage cockpit activities, such as failure to initiate
activities at the appropriate time, misprioritization of activities, or the failure to
appropriately monitor activities and terminate them when required. To facilitate the
management of the cockpit activities, a computational aid, the Agenda Manager (AM)
has been developed for use in simulated cockpit environments in an investigation which
was one aspect of a more extensive research project supported by the NASA Ames
Research Center.
The AM is directed at the management of goals and functions, the actors who
perform those functions, and the resources used by these actors. Development of an
earlier AM version, the Cockpit Task Management System (CTMS), demonstrated that it
could be used to assist flightcrews in the improvement of cockpit activity management
under experimental conditions, assuming that the AM determined pilot goals accurately
as well as the functions performed to achieve those goals.
To overcome AM limitations based on that assumption, a pilot goal
communication method (GCM) was developed to facilitate accurate recognition of pilot
goals. Embedded within AM, the GCM was used to recognize pilot goals and to declare
them to the AM. Two approaches to the recognition of pilots goals were considered:
(1) The use of an Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) system to recognize overtly or
explicitly declared pilot goals, and (2) inference of covertly or implicitly declared pilot
goals via use of an intent inferencing mechanism. These two methods were integrated
into the AM to provide a rich environment for the study of human-machine interactions
in the supervisory control of complex dynamic systems. Through simulated flight
environment experimentation, the proposed GCM has demonstrated its capability to
accurately recognize pilot goals and to handle incorrectly declared goals, and was
validated in terms of subjective workload and pilot flight control performance. / Graduation date: 1997
|
6 |
Cockpit task management errors : an ASRS incident report studyMadhavan, Devadasan 01 December 1993 (has links)
The flightcrew of a modern airliner operates in a multi-tasking environment with
several tasks competing for the same attentional resources at the same time. Too many
tasks vying for the crew's attention concurrently imposes a heavy workload on the
flightcrew. This results in the satisfactory execution of some tasks at the expense of
others. Consequently, flightcrews must manage cockpit tasks a process we call Cockpit
Task Management (CTM). Funk (1991) defines cockpit task management (CTM) as the
process flightcrews use to prioritize cockpit tasks, allocate required resources, initiate
and terminate multiple concurrent tasks.
Despite improvements in aircraft reliability and advancements in aircraft cockpit
automation, "pilot error" is cited as the main reason (over 60% of all aircraft accidents)
for planes still falling out of the skies. One of the objectives of this research was to
determine the significance of CTM errors in "pilot errors". Having established its
significance, the next step was to refine the existing error taxonomy of Chou & Funk
(1991). A structured error classification methodology was also developed for classifying
CTM errors and validated using 470 Aviation safety Reporting System (ASRS) airline
incident reports.
This study identified CTM errors as a significant component of "pilot errors"
accounting for 231 of the 470 incidents analyzed (49.2%). While Task Initiation errors
accounted for the largest of the general error categories (41.5%), it was the Task
Prioritization errors (35% of general and specific error categories) that unlocked the door
that led to error committals in the other error categories. Task Prioritization errors led to
Resource allocation errors which, in turn, resulted in several kinds of errors being
committed in the other categories.
The findings had implications that were largely training-based. In particular, the
importance of pilot education which CTM provides (as opposed to crew training that
CRM provides) is emphasized. The incorporation of formal CTM concept into existing
CRM training programs was advocated. In addition, a staggered scheduling mechanism
in crew training agenda involving CTM, CRM, Line-Oriented-Flight-Training (LOFT)
and simulator sessions was suggested. A recommendation was made for a
comprehensive Cockpit Task Management System (CTMS) to be installed in the cockpit
to help crews to prioritize tasks and remind them of the need to initiate, terminate or reprioritize
tasks as necessary. The inclusion of Air Traffic Control personnel in flightcrew
training sessions was also recommended. / Graduation date: 1994
|
7 |
Design and evaluation of an in-cockpit re-planning tool as an emergency decision aidChen, Ted L. 05 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
8 |
Investigating the role of procedures and cockpit display of traffic information in candidate air traffic management operationsYankosky, Leonard Joseph 05 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0469 seconds