My thesis maps a genealogy of patriarchal structures that underpin Algerian history, culture, and institutions between the war of independence and the 1991-2001 civil war. More specifically, I contextualize the ways in which patriarchal lineages and origin stories—and thus the symbolic and structural promises of the family—underpin political struggle. In mapping these symbolic lineages found at work in the promise of independence, and the ways in which they underpin political struggle, I demonstrate how the war of independence reified and redefined familial and patriarchal kinships within political and social structures. I suggest that historical and social conditionings found at work at these different historical moments have legitimated, to a certain extent, the domination over women and a normalization of violence against them. My thesis examines social and political discourses at four central moments in Algerian history. Firstly, in the constructions of the Algerian nation-state post independence in 1962; secondly, in the Islamic Renaissance of the 1980s and the creation of the Family Code; and in a third moment, I draw connections between the Family Code, violent political clashes of 1990s and the civil war that ensued. Finally, I analyze laws and discourses created after the civil war and the resistance movements that have continuously contested power and oppression throughout these different periods. / Thesis (Master, Gender Studies) -- Queen's University, 2014-01-30 10:39:01.867

Although a relatively new research field, many quantitative studies have over the past decade been undertaken examining rebel governance as an insurgent practice in intrastate conflicts around the globe. Nevertheless, gaps persist in the understanding of how common aspects of rebel governance, such as inclusive service provision, affect competing non-state actors in multi-rebel group conflict landscapes. Hitherto, this is the research puzzle of interest. This study asks the question: how is rebel group violence against civilians affected by a rival rebel group practising inclusive service provision? The hypothesis is that the level of violence against civilians practised by a rebel group decreases if a rival rebel group engages in inclusive service provision. The applied research method is a qualitative structured focused comparison between ELN in Colombia and GIA in Algeria from 1994 to 1999. The study does not find support for the hypothesised causal relationship, although forms of attempted emulation and outbidding of rival actors seem present in both studied cases. Further research is needed to fully dismiss the possibility of rival rebel group inclusive service provision sharing a negative variable relationship with rebel group violence against civilians.

Le propos de cette thèse est centré sur la fictionnalisation des violences terroristes qui ont ébranlé l’Algérie et les États-Unis au tournant des XXe et XXIe siècles. Deux perspectives polarisent le traitement de ces violences dans les littératures dites « de l’urgence » et « du 11 septembre » : d’un côté, la radicalisation et le passage à l’acte des personnages terroristes ; de l’autre, la terreur et la reconstruction des témoins. Appréhendées suivant le prisme du tremblement, ces perspectives qui sont traitées tout au long de la thèse mettent en jeu des questions d’ordre esthétique, poétique et éthique. Ces trois questions organisent la progression de notre étude. En engageant une réflexion relative à l’incidence du thème sur la forme, elles montrent que les romans examinés ne se contentent pas de décrire le terrorisme ; ils en dégagent les invariants : coupures, dé-liaison, instabilité sémantique, enchevêtrements complexes, sont autant de traits saillants dont les romans du corpus se saisissent, autant d’aspects par lesquels ils illustrent et cristallisent les années noires et le 11 septembre. Si ces invariants mettent en évidence la ténuité du thème et du traitement littéraire, ils ménagent par ailleurs la percée de l’équivoque du sens, du non-totalisable, du non-rapport. Cela, que Jacques Lacan formalise sous l’angle de l’impossible, du réel, ouvre la voie à un décryptage tout à fait singulier de la transgression des terroristes, du faire face des témoins, et des questions portées par le roman contemporain. / The subject of this dissertation is the fictionalization of the terrorist violence that shook Algeria and the United States at the turn of the XXth and the XXIst centuries. Two predominant viewpoints polarize the treatment of this violence in what has been dubbed by French literary critics as « littérature de l’urgence » (« emergency literature ») and « 9/11 literature »: on the one hand, the reader is exposed to the radicalization process of the terrorist characters and to their acting-out, and on the other, to the terror experienced by the witness characters and their reconstruction. These two perspectives, examined throughout the thesis, are apprehended via the prism of the tremor (understood as indecision, doubt and shaking) and involve issues of an aesthetic, poetic and ethical nature. These three issues provide coherence to the general outline and determine the organization of our study. They question the effect of theme on form, thereby demonstrating that the novels studied do not only describe terrorism ; they also bring out the underlying invariables: interruptions, disconnections, semantic instability and complex entanglements are some of the salient features whereby the novels of our corpus describe and crystallize the Algerias’ dark decade and the events of 9/11. While these invariants highlight the subtlety of the theme and its literary treatment, they also point out the equivocal meaning and give the lion’s share to the « non-totalizable » and the « non-rapport ». These aspects, which Jacques Lacan theorized from the angle of the « impossible », the Real, pave the way for a singular decoding of the terrorists’ transgression, of the witnesses’ coping, and of the issues raised by the contemporary novel.