• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 2
  • Tagged with
  • 5
  • 5
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Error Visualization in Comparison of B-Spline Surfaces

Jain, Aashish 21 October 1999 (has links)
Geometric trimming of surfaces results in a new mathematical description of the matching surface. This matching surface is required to closely resemble the remaining portion of the original surface. Typically, the approximation error in such cases is measured with a view to minimize it. The data associated with the error between two matching surfaces is large and needs to be filtered into meaningful information.This research looks at suitable norms for achieving this data reduction or abstraction with a view to provide quantitative feedback about the approximation error. Also, the differences between geometric shapes are easily discerned by the human eye but are difficult to characterize or describe. Error visualization tools have been developed to provide effective visual inputs that the designer can interpret into meaningful information. / Master of Science
2

Error estimation and stabilization for low order finite elements

Liao, Qifeng January 2010 (has links)
No description available.
3

Speeding Up and Quantifying Approximation Error in Continuum Quantum Monte Carlo Solid-State Calculations

Parker, William David 01 November 2010 (has links)
No description available.
4

Approximations polynomiales rigoureuses et applications / Rigorous Polynomial Approximations and Applications

Joldes, Mioara Maria 26 September 2011 (has links)
Quand on veut évaluer ou manipuler une fonction mathématique f, il est fréquent de la remplacer par une approximation polynomiale p. On le fait, par exemple, pour implanter des fonctions élémentaires en machine, pour la quadrature ou la résolution d'équations différentielles ordinaires (ODE). De nombreuses méthodes numériques existent pour l'ensemble de ces questions et nous nous proposons de les aborder dans le cadre du calcul rigoureux, au sein duquel on exige des garanties sur la précision des résultats, tant pour l'erreur de méthode que l'erreur d'arrondi.Une approximation polynomiale rigoureuse (RPA) pour une fonction f définie sur un intervalle [a,b], est un couple (P, Delta) formé par un polynôme P et un intervalle Delta, tel que f(x)-P(x) appartienne à Delta pour tout x dans [a,b].Dans ce travail, nous analysons et introduisons plusieurs procédés de calcul de RPAs dans le cas de fonctions univariées. Nous analysons et raffinons une approche existante à base de développements de Taylor.Puis nous les remplaçons par des approximants plus fins, tels que les polynômes minimax, les séries tronquées de Chebyshev ou les interpolants de Chebyshev.Nous présentons aussi plusieurs applications: une relative à l'implantation de fonctions standard dans une bibliothèque mathématique (libm), une portant sur le calcul de développements tronqués en séries de Chebyshev de solutions d'ODE linéaires à coefficients polynômiaux et, enfin, un processus automatique d'évaluation de fonction à précision garantie sur une puce reconfigurable. / For purposes of evaluation and manipulation, mathematical functions f are commonly replaced by approximation polynomials p. Examples include floating-point implementations of elementary functions, integration, ordinary differential equations (ODE) solving. For that, a wide range of numerical methods exists. We consider the application of such methods in the context of rigorous computing, where we need guarantees on the accuracy of the result, with respect to both the truncation and rounding errors.A rigorous polynomial approximation (RPA) for a function f defined over an interval [a,b] is a couple (P, Delta) where P is a polynomial and Delta is an interval such that f(x)-P(x) belongs to Delta, for all x in [a,b]. In this work we analyse and bring forth several ways of obtaining RPAs for univariate functions. Firstly, we analyse and refine an existing approach based on Taylor expansions. Secondly, we replace them with better approximations such as minimax approximations, Chebyshev truncated series or interpolation polynomials.Several applications are presented: one from standard functions implementation in mathematical libraries (libm), another regarding the computation of Chebyshev series expansions solutions of linear ODEs with polynomial coefficients, and finally an automatic process for function evaluation with guaranteed accuracy in reconfigurable hardware.
5

Random parameters in learning: advantages and guarantees

Evzenie Coupkova (18396918) 22 April 2024 (has links)
<p dir="ltr">The generalization error of a classifier is related to the complexity of the set of functions among which the classifier is chosen. We study a family of low-complexity classifiers consisting of thresholding a random one-dimensional feature. The feature is obtained by projecting the data on a random line after embedding it into a higher-dimensional space parametrized by monomials of order up to k. More specifically, the extended data is projected n-times and the best classifier among those n, based on its performance on training data, is chosen. </p><p dir="ltr">We show that this type of classifier is extremely flexible, as it is likely to approximate, to an arbitrary precision, any continuous function on a compact set as well as any Boolean function on a compact set that splits the support into measurable subsets. In particular, given full knowledge of the class conditional densities, the error of these low-complexity classifiers would converge to the optimal (Bayes) error as k and n go to infinity. On the other hand, if only a training dataset is given, we show that the classifiers will perfectly classify all the training points as k and n go to infinity. </p><p dir="ltr">We also bound the generalization error of our random classifiers. In general, our bounds are better than those for any classifier with VC dimension greater than O(ln(n)). In particular, our bounds imply that, unless the number of projections n is extremely large, there is a significant advantageous gap between the generalization error of the random projection approach and that of a linear classifier in the extended space. Asymptotically, as the number of samples approaches infinity, the gap persists for any such n. Thus, there is a potentially large gain in generalization properties by selecting parameters at random, rather than optimization. </p><p dir="ltr">Given a classification problem and a family of classifiers, the Rashomon ratio measures the proportion of classifiers that yield less than a given loss. Previous work has explored the advantage of a large Rashomon ratio in the case of a finite family of classifiers. Here we consider the more general case of an infinite family. We show that a large Rashomon ratio guarantees that choosing the classifier with the best empirical accuracy among a random subset of the family, which is likely to improve generalizability, will not increase the empirical loss too much. </p><p dir="ltr">We quantify the Rashomon ratio in two examples involving infinite classifier families in order to illustrate situations in which it is large. In the first example, we estimate the Rashomon ratio of the classification of normally distributed classes using an affine classifier. In the second, we obtain a lower bound for the Rashomon ratio of a classification problem with a modified Gram matrix when the classifier family consists of two-layer ReLU neural networks. In general, we show that the Rashomon ratio can be estimated using a training dataset along with random samples from the classifier family and we provide guarantees that such an estimation is close to the true value of the Rashomon ratio.</p>

Page generated in 0.1108 seconds