published_or_final_version / Architecture / Doctoral / Doctor of Philosophy

Thesis (M.Arch.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1980. / MICROFICHE COPY AVAILABLE IN ARCHIVES AND ROTCH. / Includes bibliographical references. / by Paula Jean Krugmeier. / M.Arch.

No description available.

No description available.

Thesis (M. Arch.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1981. / MICROFICHE COPY AVAILABLE IN ARCHIVES AND ROTCH. / Includes bibliographical references (leaf 75). / The loss of small scale elements and the lack of opportunity for personal elaboration has been an area of failure in contemporary buildings . These small scale elements are essential in providing human scale, enabling useful inhabitation, and giving a sense of place. This study attempts to define a design approach in which small scale elements and details will be an intrinsic outgrowth of the building process. The fulfillment of utilitarian conditions; use patterns, structure, and construction, form the basis of this approach rather than the application of some "decoration" to the basic form. This approach calls for the intensification of design decisions, based on utility and maintaining the integrity of earlier decisions. Built intensification serves as the optional aesthetic manner in which a utilitarian distinction is made. This theory of intensification is studied through a design of an infill system of interior elements to be used in multi-family housing. This system relies on standardized elements, shop fabricated, which can be custom assembled within each dwelling to meet the particular programmatic needs of the inhabitant. These elements, which would serve as storage, use surfaces and separation, would also be amenable to personal elaboration and rearrangement by the occupant at a later time. One typical dwelling unit, taken from the context of a larger housing project that I designed, serves as the area to be inhabited . There are four phases of the design process of this infill system. Each of the phases is illustrated through drawings and photographs of a model. The four phases of the design process are: 1) the primary structural zone; the catalogue of interior elements and their details; 3) the assemblage of these elements in the primary structure; and 4) the details, connections and further intensification of the assembled pieces. / by Charles Treister. / M.Arch.

No description available.

This thesis describes the development of an object library for a design support system presently being developed by the Fine Tools Group of the Architecture faculty. The object library is conceived as a library of “types” based on the premise that a major part of design solution is accomplished by reference to prior solutions. It contains graphical representations of physical objects that make up a building, wherein each object representation possesses the capability of being depicted as a building component or as a building product. The proposed object library is organized by a typology. The usage of terms in the typology, in turn, is controlled by a thesaurus which reflects an ordering of terms used to form object descriptors and contains classifiers derived from the CSI and CI/SfB classification systems. / Master of Architecture

No description available.

There is a difference between making in a material manner, as opposed to a formal one. Any selected material has certain physical properties; in the case of wood, one could posit that a certain species has a particular strength, hardness, and appearance. These properties influence our decision to work with a given species of wood. Material carries with it reference. In seeing a certain material - red clay brick, for example - our memory might refer to a prior experience with it. Formal considerations bracket out the material and the referential. Form de-materializes material and is self-referential. Form is the aspect of a thing or set of things. It is the basis for the recognition of commonality and judgement. The act of making inculcates a two-fold relationship between the material and the formal. / Master of Architecture

No description available.