Thesis (M.Arch.)--University of Detroit Mercy, 2006. / "1 May 2006". Includes bibliographical references (p. 200-204).

Thesis (Th. M.)--Dallas Theological Seminary, 2004. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves [59]-65).

Thesis (M. Phil.)--University of Hong Kong, 1999. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 84-87).

Thesis (ML.(Prof)) -- University of Pretoria, 2008. / Abstract in English. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M. S.)--Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2008. / Choudhary, Ruchi, Committee Member ; Shaw, Jonathan, Committee Member ; Augenbroe, Godfried, Committee Chair.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Sydney, 2000. / Title from title screen (viewed December 12, 2008). Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the Dept. of Architectural and Design Science, Faculty of Architecture. Includes bibliographical references. Also available in print form.

Previous studies of the design studio have tended to treat learning to design as a matter of learning to think in the right way, despite the recognition that material artifacts and the ability to make and manipulate them in architectural ways is important to the design process. Through the use of empirical data gathered from watching design teachers and students in action, this thesis works to discover how material things and bodies are important to the fabrication of architectural meaning and architectural subjectivity within design studios. In particular the role of gesture is highlighted as doing important work in design studio knowledge practices. / The approach taken in this thesis is to treat design activity in design studios in a ‘post-human’ way. An analytical eye is turned to how things and people perform together and are organised in various ways, using Actor network theory (ANT) as a way to orientate the investigation. The assumption drawn from ANT is that that architectural meaning, knowledge and identity can positioned as network effects, enacted into being as the design studio is ‘done’ by the various actors — including material things, such as architectural representations, and human behaviours, such as gesture. / Gesture has been largely ignored by design studio researchers, perhaps because it tends to operate below the threshold of conscious awareness. Gesture is difficult to study because the meanings of most gestures produced during conversations are spontaneous and provisional. Despite this humans seem to be good interpreters of gesture. When studied in detail, ongoing design studio activity is found to rely on the intelligibility of gesture done in ‘architectural ways’. The main site for the observation of gesture during this study was the ‘desk crit’ where teachers and students confer about work in progress. In the data gathered for this thesis gesture is found to operate with representations in three key ways: explaining and describing architectural composition, ‘sticking’ spoken meanings strategically to representations and conveying the phenomenological experience of occupying architectural space – the passing of time, quality of light, texture and movement. / Despite the fact that most of the work of the thesis centres on human behaviour, the findings about the role of gesture and representation trouble the idea of the human as being at the centre of the action, putting the bodies of teachers and students amongst a crowd of non human others who participate together in design knowledge making practices.

Thesis (M. Arch.)--Carleton University, 2004. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 78-81). Also available in electronic format on the Internet.

Thesis (M. Arch.)--Carleton University, 2005. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 110-115). Also available in electronic format on the Internet.

Thesis (M.Arch.) - Carleton University, 2008. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 62-63). Also available in electronic format on the Internet.