• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

L?gicas socioculturais e estrat?gias produtivas no assentamento menina dos olhos dos sem-terra. / Sociocultural logics and productive strategies in the menina dos olhos dos sem-terra (landless) settlement.

Piccin, Marcos Botton 23 August 2007 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T20:12:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2007- Marcos Botton Piccin.pdf: 3891788 bytes, checksum: 50ac5d427e99048c73b932fdad6563b0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-08-23 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / This work consists of a research that analyzes the underlying sociocultural logics to the productive strategies developed by the landless farmers settled in the rural Settlement called Ceres, RS. That Settlement was formed in the end of 1996 and it received landless farm workers of several areas and municipal districts of Rio Grande do Sul, having different paths and acquired social experiences in the different busy social positions in the structure of relationships of the society. Hence the occupation of the territory and the social-historical development of that state have conformed certain social positions to the poor rural workers as small farmers, temporary and permanent workers, millers, lacemakers, among other generating potentially different principles of action, behaviors, codes and operational modalities that provide a group of knowledge, creeds and a certain practical sense, working as social habitus. In this sense, this sociocultural heterogeneity tends to compose the social processes as much of the camps as of the rural settlements and it can be expressed by the different situations that took the rural workers to the fight for the land, for the different objectives related to the ownership of a lot, as well as for the differentiated projects and future dreams elaborated among those individuals. Then, when in the establishment of awareness, knowledge, projects and future dreams which have been built along the social paths tend to make present and updated face of the found circumstances regarding the differential of powers among the different social agents of the local and regional environment. Like this, the cultivations, handlings and several forms of productive occupation of the land lots for the farmer-seated can also represent that social-cultural heterogeneity forged by the socialhistorical process. In that sense, the research classified the farmer-seated in three productive systems considered as diversified, soy-milk, and soy farmers through a survey questionnaire and it was opted for living the daily of them starting from an interview of a pre-selected sample of seated families. The analysis of the data and information allow considering that the interactions and reactions from those environments do not occur in the same way by the group of the farmer-seated in the establishment of the strategies of social reproduction. The existence of three productive systems in the Settlement tends to correspond to the sociocultural internal factors along the social paths. As a result, the significances attributed to the differentiated forms of productive occupation of the land lots reveal desires and life projects longed for and also differentiated and such objectives are believed to be possible to achieve in the Settlement. . / Este trabalho consiste em uma pesquisa que analisa as l?gicas socioculturais subjacentes ?s estrat?gias produtivas desenvolvidas pelos agricultores-assentados no Assentamento rural Ceres, RS. Esse Assentamento foi formado no final de 1996 e recebeu agricultores sem-terra de v?rias regi?es e munic?pios do Rio Grande do Sul, com diferentes trajet?rias e experi?ncias sociais adquiridas nas diferentes posi??es sociais ocupadas na estrutura de rela??es da sociedade. A ocupa??o do territ?rio e o desenvolvimento s?cio-hist?rico desse estado conformaram determinadas posi??es sociais aos trabalhadores rurais pobres como pequenos agricultores, trabalhadores tempor?rios e permanentes, meeiros, rendeiros, entre outras, gerando, potencialmente, distintos princ?pios de a??o, comportamentos, c?digos e modalidades operacionais que conferem um conjunto de saberes, cren?as e um senso pr?tico determinado, funcionando como habitus sociais. Esta heterogeneidade sociocultural tende a compor os processos sociais tanto dos acampamentos quanto dos assentamentos rurais e pode ser expressada pelas diferentes situa??es que levaram os trabalhadores rurais ? luta pela terra, pelos diferentes objetivos para com a posse de um lote, assim como pelos diferenciados projetos e sonhos de futuro elaborados entre esses indiv?duos. Quando em assentamento os saberes, conhecimentos, projetos e sonhos de futuro constru?dos ao longo das trajet?rias sociais tendem a ser presentificados e atualizados frente ?s circunst?ncias encontradas dos diferenciais de poderes entre os distintos agentes sociais que figuram a ambi?ncia local e regional. Assim, os cultivos, manejos e formas diversas de ocupa??o produtiva dos lotes de terra pelos agricultores-assentados tamb?m podem representar aquela heterogeneidade sociocultural forjada pelo processo s?cio-hist?rico. Nesse sentido, a pesquisa classificou os agricultores-assentados em tr?s sistemas produtivos considerados como diversificado, sojaleite e soja atrav?s de um question?rio tipo survey e optou-se pela viv?ncia do cotidiano dos mesmos a partir do qual se procedeu a entrevista de uma amostra pr?-selecionada de fam?lias assentadas. A an?lise dos dados e informa??es permite considerar que as intera??es e rea??es a essas ambi?ncias n?o se d?o da mesma forma pelo conjunto dos agricultores-assentados no estabelecimento das estrat?gias de reprodu??o social. A exist?ncia de tr?s sistemas produtivos no Assentamento tende a corresponder aos fatores socioculturais internalizados ao longo das trajet?rias sociais. As significa??es atribu?das ?s formas diferenciadas de ocupa??o produtiva dos lotes de terra revelam desejos e projetos de vida almejados tamb?m diferenciados e que se julga poss?vel alcan?ar no Assentamento.

Page generated in 0.1003 seconds