The research aims to combine various quantity models to set up a working platform that can apply to the wealth management business, including the analysis of product¡¦s return, reflection of investors' idiosyncrasy and construction of investment portfolio, building a succession of procedure hope to become the standard of the work. Regarding constructing the model, the style analysis, Black-Litterman Model and risk budget three quantitative method were adopted for three major pillars of wealth management factor model to disassemble the return of funds, allocate the assets and optimize manager structure. The materials range is from 2003 to 2007, use style analysis to disassemble the return of 115 funds that sell in Taiwan into 14 index. Incorporate investor's expectancy of market performance and suggest the assets allocation by Black-Litterman model. Join 14 index funds and 14 enhance index funds, carry on the disposition of the optimizing manager structures with the risk budget to determine the suggested fund portfolio finally. By selecting the funds with best total return in the past year forms the contrasting portfolio to compare the investment style of portfolio and characteristic of return with the models. Finding in the experience, contrasting portfolio is superior to suggested portfolio in active return only, both portfolios are similar in total return. In further consideration of the trade-off effect of return and risk in both portfolios, the suggested portfolio of the model is better than the contrasting portfolio either in IR or in Sharpe Ratio. In addition, if investors choose funds on the basis of total return, it may cause the style of whole portfolio too centralized throw the total risk in high level.

This dissertation work focuses on evaluation of the performance and credibility of domestic pension funds. It includes information about pension systems in six selected countries in the world, specifically Chile, Hungary, Switzerland, Poland, Sweden and Slovakia, and culminates with a proposal for pension reform in the Czech Republic. The evaluation of the performance of pension funds is based on experience with measuring performance in twenty-three countries of the world processed for the OECD and cites original basis materials for proposals for the regulation of pension funds in the Czech Republic. Setting of indicators is preceded by an analysis of measurements of performance by the Association of Pension Funds in the Czech Republic and the Research Institute of Labour and Social Affairs. The most important proposed indicators include the actual result in relation to the participants' funds, which captures the influence of changes in the market values of financial assets, and the indicator of competence covers obligations, reflecting the influence of changes in costs during subsequent periods, which include yet undistributed commission for mediators of pension insurance. For a comparison of benefits and risks, mutual funds denominated in CZK were selected, which were verified as a suitable alternative to long-term saving. The method of evaluation of pension funds itself is based on explanation, evaluation and selection of favourable indicators for determining the rating of domestic pension funds, which clients of pension funds could use as a method for evaluating the credibility and benefits of a specific domestic pension fund for the purpose of securing it in retirement age.