NDLTD Global ETD Search
  • Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.

Search results

Showing 1 to 4 of 4 (0.054 seconds)

Spelling suggestions: "subject:"australia.this court"" "subject:"australia.this fourt""

1

The constitutional jurisprudence of the High Court of Australia : legalism, realism, pragmatism, judicial power and the Dixon, Mason and Gleeson eras.

Gray, Rachael January 2007 (has links)
Title page, contents and abstract only. The complete thesis in print form is available from the University of Adelaide Library. / "The thesis of this dissertation is that the Gleeson High Court is a largely a-theoretical Court, in that the judicial decisions of the Court are characterised by a low-level of abstraction, and the Gleeson Court does not theorise at length about the reasons for adopting a particular judicial approach. This approach distinguishes the Gleeson Court from the realist based jurisprudence of the Mason Court, which articulated the relevance of legal theory and tended to make statements of wide legal principle. The approach of the Gleeson Court also diverges from Dixonian legalism, which the analysis presented in this thesis will establish is a theoretical form of legalism." --p. 4. / http://proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/login?url= http://library.adelaide.edu.au/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?BBID=1297203 / Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, Law School, 2007
2

The constitutional jurisprudence of the High Court of Australia : legalism, realism, pragmatism, judicial power and the Dixon, Mason and Gleeson eras.

Gray, Rachael January 2007 (has links)
Title page, contents and abstract only. The complete thesis in print form is available from the University of Adelaide Library. / "The thesis of this dissertation is that the Gleeson High Court is a largely a-theoretical Court, in that the judicial decisions of the Court are characterised by a low-level of abstraction, and the Gleeson Court does not theorise at length about the reasons for adopting a particular judicial approach. This approach distinguishes the Gleeson Court from the realist based jurisprudence of the Mason Court, which articulated the relevance of legal theory and tended to make statements of wide legal principle. The approach of the Gleeson Court also diverges from Dixonian legalism, which the analysis presented in this thesis will establish is a theoretical form of legalism." --p. 4. / http://proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/login?url= http://library.adelaide.edu.au/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?BBID=1297203 / Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, Law School, 2007
3

Judicial entrepreneurism and the politics of institutional change: an analysis of the recent judicial role transformation in the High Court of Australia

Pierce, Jason Louis 28 August 2008 (has links)
Not available / text
Australia--High Court
Judicial process--Australia
Organizational change--Australia
4

Constitutional facts and their judicial ascertainment in the United States Supreme Court with a comparative reference to the practice of the Australian High Court

Kenny, Susan Coralie January 1988 (has links)
No description available.
340

Page generated in 0.0591 seconds