As the volume of transcriptomic data continues to increase, so too does its potential to deepen our understanding of disease; for example, by revealing gene expression patterns shared between diseases. However, key questions remain around the strength of the transcriptomic signal of disease and the identification of meaningful commonalities between datasets, which are addressed in this thesis as follows. The first chapter, Concordance of Microarray Studies of Parkinson's Disease, examines the agreement between differential expression signatures across 33 studies of Parkinson's disease. Comparison of these studies, which cover a range of microarray platforms, tissues, and disease models, reveals a characteristic pattern of differential expression in the most highly-affected tissues in human patients. Using correlation and clustering analyses to measure the representativeness of different study designs to human disease, the work described acts as a guideline for the comparison of microarray studies in the following chapters. In the next chapter, Using Dysregulated Signalling Paths to Understand Disease, gene expression changes are linked on the human signalling network, enabling identification of network regions dysregulated in disease. Applying this method across a large dataset of 141 common and rare diseases identifies dysregulated processes shared between diverse conditions, which relate to known disease- and drug-sharing-relationships. The final chapter, Understanding and Predicting Disease Relationships Through Similarity Fusion, explores the integration of gene expression with other data types - in this case, ontological, phenotypic, literature co-occurrence, genetic, and drug data - to understand relationships between diseases. A similarity fusion approach is proposed to overcome the differences in data type properties between each space, resulting in the identification of novel disease relationships spanning multiple bioinformatic levels. The similarity of disease relationships between each data type is considered, revealing that relationships in differential expression space are distinct from those in other molecular and clinical spaces. In summary, the work described in this thesis sets out a framework for the comparative analysis of transcriptomic data in disease, including the integration of biological networks and other bioinformatic data types, in order to further our knowledge of diseases and the relationships between them.

Orientador: Prof. Dr. David Corrêa Martins Júnior / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal do ABC, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Computação, 2017.

La importancia de comprender los procesos biológicos ha estimulado el desarrollo de métodos para la detección de interacciones proteína-proteína. Esta tesis presenta PIANA (Protein Interactions And Network Analysis), un programa informático para la integración y el análisis de redes de interacción proteicas. Además, describimos un método que identifica motivos de interacción basándose en que las proteínas con parejas de interacción comunes tienden a interaccionar con esas parejas a través del mismo motivo de interacción. Encontramos que las proteínas altamente conectadas (i.e., hubs) con múltiples motivos tienen mayor probabilidad de ser esenciales para la viabilidad de la célula que los hubs con uno o dos motivos. Finalmente, presentamos un método que predice genes relacionados con cáncer mediante la integración de redes de interacción proteicas, datos de expresión diferenciada y propiedades estructurales, funcionales y evolutivas. El valor de predicción positiva es 71% con sensitividad del 1%, superando a otros métodos usados independientemente. / The importance of understanding cellular processes prompted the development of experimental approaches that detect protein-protein interactions. Here, we describe a software platform called PIANA (Protein Interactions And Network Analysis) that integrates interaction data from multiple sources and automates the analysis of protein interaction networks. Moreover, we describe a method that delineates interacting motifs by relying on the observation that proteins with common interaction partners tend to interact with these partners through the same interacting motif. We find that highly connected proteins (i.e., hubs) with multiple interacting motifs are more likely to be essential for cellular viability than hubs with one or two interacting motifs. Furthermore, we present a method that predicts cancer genes by integrating protein interaction networks, differential expression studies and structural, functional and evolutionary properties. For a sensitivity of 1%, the positive predictive value is 71%, which outperforms the use of any of the methods independently.