Spelling suggestions: "subject:"beef industry -- botswana"" "subject:"beef industry -- motswana""
1 |
Econometric analysis of supply response among beef farmers in BotswanaGosalamang, Dikgang Stephen January 2010 (has links)
Thesis (M.Sc. (Agricultural economics)) --University of Limpopo, 2011 / The cattle (especially beef) industry in Botswana has traditionally played an important role in the country’s economy, with significant contributions to Gross Domestic Product (GDP), exports, and employment, as well as playing an important role in social and cultural spheres. Agriculture contributes about 2.3 % of GDP, out of which 70% - 80% is attributable to cattle production. By 2004, beef exports amounted to P284m, approximately 1.7% of total exports of P16.2 billion. In recent years, however, there have been signs of decline and stagnation, especially in the beef export subsector, with adverse implications for the viability of cattle farming in the country, and more generally for rural livelihoods. Botswana’s beef subsector has not fulfilled its potential as a contributor to economic growth and development, especially in the rural areas. The BMC has never been able to meet its quota of 19 000 tonnes of beef to the European Union (EU), despite being cushioned by the Continuo agreement against price competition from more efficient beef producers like Brazil.
With the above background, the study was undertaken to examine the supply response of beef farmers in Botswana to various economic (e.g. prices) and non-economic [e.g. rainfall, technology and inventory (cattle population)] factors. This study used historical data on Botswana’s beef subsector for the period 1993 to 2005, and Nerlove’s partial adjustment model was used for the empirical analysis of the data.
The results of the study revealed that Botswana beef farmers respond positively to price incentives and time trend (proxy for technology), and negatively to all other variables. Elasticities of supply showed that cattle supply is elastic with respect to variations in producer price and almost unit elastic to changes in cattle inventory. However, the response to shocks in other variables included in the model was inelastic. Short run price elasticity of supply is 1.511 whereas long run price elasticity is 10.57, a clear sign that pricing can be employed as a strategy to enhance beef production in Botswana. The speed of adjustment however, was relatively very low at 14% per period. This slow adjustment perhaps tells us that Botswana farmers, who are predominantly subsistence farmers, may not be having enough capacity (in terms of resources and technology) to immediately increase production when economic environment improves in their favour.
Based on the results it is recommended that price increase be adopted as a strategy for improving cattle supply. Extension services need to be strengthened with a view of promoting cattle farming as a commercial activity. Current technology of using communal grazing and indigenous breeds need to be improved. It is also recommended that studies be conducted to determine the suitability of technology that is at the disposal of the farmers. Lastly Botswana government needs to come up with a strategy by which farmers can change from their attitude of oxen production to weaner production.
|
2 |
Determinants of herd productivity in Botswana : a focus on land tenure and land policy.Mahabile, Meck. January 2006 (has links)
This study attempts to identify factors responsible for determining differences in the
productivity of cattle managed by communal and private livestock farmers in the
southern region of Botswana during 1999/2000. It is hypothesised that herd
productivity and investment in southern Botswana are higher on private ranches than
on open access communal grazing land.
This study is important because livestock, especially cattle, contribute significantly to
the livelihood of farmers in Botswana. Cattle are a major source of meat, milk and
draught power, and provide a store of wealth that protects against inflation and which
can easily be converted into cash. Cattle production is also an important source of
employment in the rural economy of Botswana. Furthermore, the export of beef is a
major source of foreign exchange earnings, and cattle account for 80 percent of
agriculture's contribution to Botswana's gross domestic product.
A stratified random sample survey of communal and private livestock farmers was
conducted in the southern region of Botswana from August 1999 to May 2000 with the
assistance of four enumerators. The sample survey data were used to compute
descriptive statistics and to estimate the parameters of a block recursive regression
model. The model postulated relationships between agricultural credit, investment in
fixed improvement, investment in operating inputs and herd productivity. Some of the
equations are estimated with Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and some with Two-Stage
Least Squares (2SLS) to account for likely correlation between endogenous
explanatory variables and the error term.
Descriptive statistics show that levels of investment and herd productivity are higher
on private farms than on open-access communal grazing. Private farmers are also better
educated, more liquid, and have larger herd sizes, but do not differ from their
communal counterparts in terms of age, gender, race or household size. The regression
results show that (a) respondents with secure tenure and larger herds use more
agricultural credit than those who rely on open access communal grazing land to raise
cattle; (b) secure land tenure, higher levels of liquidity and use of long-term credit
promote investment in fixed improvements to land; (c) liquidity from short-term credit
and wage remittances supports expenditure on operating inputs; and (d) herd
productivity increases with greater investment in fixed improvement and operating
inputs. Herd productivity is therefore positively (but indirectly) influenced by secure
land tenure.
It can therefore be inferred that government should (a) uphold private property rights to
land where they already exists; (b) privatise open access grazing to individual owner operators
where this is politically, socially, and economically feasible; and (c) where
privatisation to individuals is not feasible, government should encourage users to
convert the grazing into common property by subsidising the costs of defining user
groups and the boundaries of their resources, and enforcing rules limiting individual
use of common property. This first-step in a gradual shift towards more secure tenure
should be followed by the conversion of user groups to non-user groups organized
along the lines of investor-owned firms where members exchange use rights for benefit
and voting rights in a joint venture managed by an expert. / Thesis (Ph.D.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2006.
|
Page generated in 0.0816 seconds