• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 192
  • Tagged with
  • 192
  • 192
  • 191
  • 187
  • 181
  • 181
  • 181
  • 173
  • 72
  • 70
  • 52
  • 50
  • 46
  • 36
  • 26
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
91

Least common subsumers, most specific concepts, and role-value-maps in a description logic with existential restrictions and terminological cycles

Baader, Franz 30 May 2022 (has links)
In a previous report we have investigates subsumption in the presence of terminological cycles for the description logic EL, which allows conjunctions, existential restrictions, and the top concept, and have shown that the subsumption problem remains polynomial for all three types of semantics usually considered for cyclic definitions in description logics. This result depends on a characterization of subsumption through the existence of certain simulation relations on the graph associated with a terminology. In the present report we will use this characterization to show how the most specific concept and the least common subsumer can be computed in EL with cyclic definitions. In addition, we show that subsumption in EL (with or without cyclic definitions) remains polynomial even if one adds a certain restricted form of global role-value-maps to EL. In particular, this kind of role-value-maps can express transitivity of roles.
92

A Tableau Calculus for Temporal Description Logic: The Constant Domain Case.

Lutz, Carsten, Sturm, Holger, Wolter, Frank, Zakharyaschev, Michael 24 May 2022 (has links)
We show how to combine the standard tableau system for the basic description logic ALC and Wolper´s tableau calculus for propositional temporal logic PTL (with the temporal operators ‘next-time’ and ‘until’) in order to design a terminating sound and complete tableau-based satisfiability-checking algorithm for the temporal description logic PTL ALC of [19] interpreted in models with constant domains. We use the method of quasimodels [17, 15] to represent models with infinite domains, and the technique of minimal types [11] to maintain these domains constant. The combination is flexible and can be extended to more expressive description logics or even do decidable fragments of first-order temporal logics.
93

Ontology-Mediated Probabilistic Model Checking: Extended Version

Dubslaff, Clemens, Koopmann, Patrick, Turhan, Anni-Yasmin 20 June 2022 (has links)
Probabilistic model checking (PMC) is a well-established method for the quantitative analysis of dynamic systems. On the other hand, description logics (DLs) provide a well-suited formalism to describe and reason about static knowledge, used in many areas to specify domain knowledge in an ontology. We investigate how such knowledge can be integrated into the PMC process, introducing ontology-mediated PMC. Specifically, we propose a formalism that links ontologies to dynamic behaviors specified by guarded commands, the de-facto standard input formalism for PMC tools such as Prism. Further, we present and implement a technique for their analysis relying on existing DL-reasoning and PMC tools. This way, we enable the application of standard PMC techniques to analyze knowledge-intensive systems. Our approach is implemented and evaluated on a multi-server system case study, where different DL-ontologies are used to provide specifications of different server platforms and situations the system is executed in.
94

Role-Value Maps and General Concept Inclusions in the Description Logic FL₀

Baader, Franz, Théron, Clément 20 June 2022 (has links)
We investigate the impact that general concept inclusions and role-value maps have on the complexity and decidability of reasoning in the Description Logic FL₀. On the one hand, we give a more direct proof for ExpTimehardness of subsumption w.r.t. general concept inclusions in FL₀. On the other hand, we determine restrictions on role-value maps that ensure decidability of subsumption, but we also show undecidability for the cases where these restrictions are not satisfied.
95

Deciding the Word Problem for Ground Identities with Commutative and Extensional Symbols

Baader, Franz, Kapur, Deepak 20 June 2022 (has links)
The word problem for a finite set of ground identities is known to be decidable in polynomial time using congruence closure, and this is also the case if some of the function symbols are assumed to be commutative. We show that decidability in P is preserved if we add the assumption that certain function symbols f are extensional in the sense that f(s1,…,sn) ≈ f(t1,…,tn) implies s1 ≈ t1,…,sn ≈ tn. In addition, we investigate a variant of extensionality that is more appropriate for commutative function symbols, but which raises the complexity of the word problem to coNP.
96

Answering Regular Path Queries Under Approximate Semantics in Lightweight Description Logics

Gil, Oliver Fernández, Turhan, Anni-Yasmin 20 June 2022 (has links)
Classical regular path queries (RPQs) can be too restrictive for some applications and answering such queries under approximate semantics to relax the query is desirable. While for answering regular path queries over graph databases under approximate semantics algorithms are available, such algorithms are scarce for the ontology-mediated setting. In this paper we extend an approach for answering RPQs over graph databases that uses weighted transducers to approximate paths from the query in two ways. The first extension is to answering approximate conjunctive 2-way regular path queries (C2RPQs) over graph databases and the second is to answering C2RPQs over ELH and DL-LiteR ontologies. We provide results on the computational complexity of the underlying reasoning problems and devise approximate query answering algorithms.
97

Deductive Module Extraction for Expressive Description Logics: Extended Version

Koopmann, Patrick, Chen, Jieying 20 June 2022 (has links)
In deductive module extraction, we determine a small subset of an ontology for a given vocabulary that preserves all logical entailments that can be expressed in that vocabulary. While in the literature stronger module notions have been discussed, we argue that for applications in ontology analysis and ontology reuse, deductive modules, which are decidable and potentially smaller, are often sufficient. We present methods based on uniform interpolation for extracting different variants of deductive modules, satisfying properties such as completeness, minimality and robustness under replacements, the latter being particularly relevant for ontology reuse. An evaluation of our implementation shows that the modules computed by our method are often significantly smaller than those computed by existing methods. / This is an extended version of the article in the proceedings of IJCAI 2020.
98

Computing Compliant Anonymisations of Quantified ABoxes w.r.t. EL Policies: Extended Version

Baader, Franz, Kriegel, Francesco, Nuradiansyah, Adrian, Peñaloza, Rafael 20 June 2022 (has links)
We adapt existing approaches for privacy-preserving publishing of linked data to a setting where the data are given as Description Logic (DL) ABoxes with possibly anonymised (formally: existentially quantified) individuals and the privacy policies are expressed using sets of concepts of the DL EL. We provide a chacterization of compliance of such ABoxes w.r.t. EL policies, and show how optimal compliant anonymisations of ABoxes that are noncompliant can be computed. This work extends previous work on privacypreserving ontology publishing, in which a very restricted form of ABoxes, called instance stores, had been considered, but restricts the attention to compliance. The approach developed here can easily be adapted to the problem of computing optimal repairs of quantified ABoxes. / This is an extended version of an article pulished in: Proceedings of the 19th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2020), Springer LNCS
99

Computing Safe Anonymisations of Quantified ABoxes w.r.t. EL Policies: Extended Version

Baader, Franz, Kriegel, Francesco, Nuradiansyah, Adrian, Peñaloza, Rafael 20 June 2022 (has links)
In recent work, we have shown how to compute compliant anonymizations of quantified ABoxes w.r.t. EL policies. In this setting, quantified ABoxes can be used to publish information about individuals, some of which are anonymized. The policy is given by concepts of the Description Logic (DL) EL, and compliance means that one cannot derive from the ABox that some non-anonymized individual is an instance of a policy concept. If one assumes that a possible attacker could have additional knowledge about some of the involved non-anonymized individuals, then compliance with a policy is not sufficient. One wants to ensure that the quantified ABox is safe in the sense that none of the secret instance information is revealed, even if the attacker has additional compliant knowledge. In the present paper, we show that safety can be decided in polynomial time, and that the unique optimal safe anonymization of a non-safe quantified ABox can be computed in exponential time, provided that the policy consists of a single EL concept. / This is an extended version of an article published in: Proceedings of the 36th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC ’21), ACM
100

Making Quantification Relevant Again —the Case of Defeasible EL⊥

Pensel, Maximilian, Turhan, Anni-Yasmin 20 June 2022 (has links)
Defeasible Description Logics (DDLs) extend Description Logics with defeasible concept inclusions. Reasoning in DDLs often employs rational or relevant closure according to the (propositional) KLM postulates. If in DDLs with quantification a defeasible subsumption relationship holds between concepts, this relationship might also hold if these concepts appear in existential restrictions. Such nested defeasible subsumption relationships were not detected by earlier reasoning algorithms—neither for rational nor relevant closure. In this report, we present a new approach for EL ⊥ that alleviates this problem for relevant closure (the strongest form of preferential reasoning currently investigated) by the use of typicality models that extend classical canonical models by domain elements that individually satisfy any amount of consistent defeasible knowledge. We also show that a certain restriction on the domain of the typicality models in this approach yields inference results that correspond to the (weaker) more commonly known rational closure. / Abriged versions appeared in the proceedings of DARe and LPNMR 2017

Page generated in 0.0679 seconds