Spelling suggestions: "subject:"bilateral cochlear implants"" "subject:"nilateral cochlear implants""
1 |
Evaluating Speech-in-Noise Performance of Bilateral Cochlear Implant PerformanceLim, Stacey 20 August 2013 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
The Value of Two Ears for Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments: Two Cochlear Implants vs. Two Partially Hearing Ears and One Cochlear ImplantJanuary 2013 (has links)
abstract: Two groups of cochlear implant (CI) listeners were tested for sound source localization and for speech recognition in complex listening environments. One group (n=11) wore bilateral CIs and, potentially, had access to interaural level difference (ILD) cues, but not interaural timing difference (ITD) cues. The second group (n=12) wore a single CI and had low-frequency, acoustic hearing in both the ear contralateral to the CI and in the implanted ear. These `hearing preservation' listeners, potentially, had access to ITD cues but not to ILD cues. At issue in this dissertation was the value of the two types of information about sound sources, ITDs and ILDs, for localization and for speech perception when speech and noise sources were separated in space. For Experiment 1, normal hearing (NH) listeners and the two groups of CI listeners were tested for sound source localization using a 13 loudspeaker array. For the NH listeners, the mean RMS error for localization was 7 degrees, for the bilateral CI listeners, 20 degrees, and for the hearing preservation listeners, 23 degrees. The scores for the two CI groups did not differ significantly. Thus, both CI groups showed equivalent, but poorer than normal, localization. This outcome using the filtered noise bands for the normal hearing listeners, suggests ILD and ITD cues can support equivalent levels of localization. For Experiment 2, the two groups of CI listeners were tested for speech recognition in noise when the noise sources and targets were spatially separated in a simulated `restaurant' environment and in two versions of a `cocktail party' environment. At issue was whether either CI group would show benefits from binaural hearing, i.e., better performance when the noise and targets were separated in space. Neither of the CI groups showed spatial release from masking. However, both groups showed a significant binaural advantage (a combination of squelch and summation), which also maintained separation of the target and noise, indicating the presence of some binaural processing or `unmasking' of speech in noise. Finally, localization ability in Experiment 1 was not correlated with binaural advantage in Experiment 2. / Dissertation/Thesis / Ph.D. Speech and Hearing Science 2013
|
3 |
The outcomes of bilateral cochlear implants in adult recipientsSwart, Tania 30 November 2009 (has links)
Although unilateral cochlear implants generally provide good speech understanding under quiet conditions, patients with unilateral cochlear implants frequently report difficulty in understanding speech in the presence of background noise and difficulty in localizing the source of sound. Since these two listening functions require binaural hearing in normal hearing individuals, there has been a growing interest in bilateral cochlear implants as intervention type for people with severe-to-profound bilateral hearing loss. This study investigated the outcomes of bilateral cochlear implants in all the adult recipients of the Pretoria Cochlear Implant Program. All the subjects with BCIs were asked to choose a significant other person to participate in the study. All the subjects (i.e. subjects with BCIs and their significant other people) were asked to participate in a semi-structured interview and to fill out a researcher-generated questionnaire. The subjects with BCIs also underwent audiometric testing. The majority of the subjects with BCIs were found to demonstrate improved ability to understand speech in the presence of background noise and, to some extent, in their ability to localize sound sources. As both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to determine the outcomes, it could be demonstrated that the majority of adult bilateral cochlear implant recipients gain from the auditory benefits in everyday listening situations. The majority of subjects and their significant other people conferred that their improved auditory skills allow them to be more participative in social, cultural, and other activities, which add to the quality of their lives. / Dissertation (MCommunication Pathology)--University of Pretoria, 2009. / Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology / Unrestricted
|
4 |
Long-term effects of second cochlear implantation with sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in Japanese children / 日本における両側逐次人工内耳装用児の二側目の人工内耳装用効果の長期経過森, 尚彫 23 May 2024 (has links)
京都大学 / 新制・論文博士 / 博士(医学) / 乙第13632号 / 論医博第2323号 / 新制||医||1074(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院医学研究科医学専攻 / (主査)教授 辻川 明孝, 教授 滝田 順子, 教授 森田 智視 / 学位規則第4条第2項該当 / Doctor of Medical Science / Kyoto University / DFAM
|
5 |
Speech recognition in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants in quiet and in noiseDawood, Gouwa 12 1900 (has links)
Thesis (MAud (Interdisciplinary Health Sciences. Speech-Language and Hearing Therapy)--Stellenbosch University, 2008. / Individuals are increasingly undergoing bilateral cochlear implantation in an attempt to
benefit from binaural hearing. The main aim of the present study was to compare the
speech recognition of children fitted with bilateral cochlear implants, under binaural and
monaural listening conditions, in quiet and in noise. Ten children, ranging in age from 5
years 7 months to 15 years 4 months, were tested using the Children’s Realistic Index for
Speech Perception (CRISP). All the children were implanted with Nucleus multi-channel
cochlear implant systems in sequential operations and used the ACE coding strategy
bilaterally. The duration of cochlear implant use ranged from 4 years to 8 years 11
months for the first implant and 7 months to 3 years 5 months for the second implant.
Each child was tested in eight listening conditions, which included testing in the presence
and absence of competing speech. Performance with bilateral cochlear implants was not
statistically better than performance with the first cochlear implant, for both quiet and
noisy listening conditions. A ceiling effect may have resulted in the lack of a significant
finding as the scores obtained during unilateral conditions were already close to
maximum. A positive correlation between the length of use of the second cochlear
implant and speech recognition performance was established. The results of the present
study strongly indicated the need for testing paradigms to be devised which are more
sensitive and representative of the complex auditory environments in which cochlear
implant users communicate.
|
Page generated in 0.0919 seconds