• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 2
  • Tagged with
  • 3
  • 3
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Avaliação microtomográfica e histomorfométrica do processo de reparo de defeitos ósseos em calvária de coelhos tratados com diferentes materiais de enxerto / Microtomographic and histomorphometric evaluation of bone repair in rabbit cranial defects treated with different graft materials

Arantes, Ricardo Vinicius Nunes 08 July 2016 (has links)
Um dos grandes desafios para o tratamento de defeitos ósseos extensos na região bucomaxilofacial têm sido o desenvolvimento de um biomaterial substituto ósseo ao enxerto autógeno. No presente trabalho avaliou-se a formação óssea e a biodegrabilidade do osso desproteinizado bovino Bio-Oss® e do seu similar GenOx Inorg® e da cerâmica bifásica GenPhos® XP no processo de reparo de defeitos ósseos cranianos em coelhos, comparativamente ao osso autógeno (controle positivo) e coágulo sanguíneo (controle negativo). Foram realizados cirurgicamente defeitos bilaterais de 8-mm de diâmetro nos ossos parietais de 39 coelhos. A seguir os defeitos foram preenchidos aleatoriamente com 0,1cm3 de material ou coágulo conforme cada grupo de tratamento. Após os períodos de 4, 8 e 24 semanas os crânios foram coletados, analisados no microtomógrafo e processados histologicamente. O percentual de volume do defeito ocupado pelo material e osso neoformado foi avaliado pela microtomografia e histomorfometria, enquanto que, para a medula óssea, tegumento e tecido conjuntivo, apenas pela análise histomorfométrica. Os resultados quantitativos obtidos foram comparados estatisticamente pela ANOVA a dois critérios (período e tratamento) e teste de Tukey com p<0,05. A intensidade da associação linear dos dados microtomográficos e histomorfométricos avaliada pelo coeficiente de correlação de Pearson, mostraram correlação moderada a forte. Nos períodos iniciais de reparo (30 e 60 dias), os defeitos tratados com Bio-Oss®, GenOx® Inorg e GenPhos® XP apresentaram manutenção do volume do material enxertado (Vvi médio de 34% ) e formação óssea menor e mais imatura em relação grupo autógeno (Vvi = 22% vs. 32% no grupo autógeno). No período mais tardio (180 dias) a quantidade de formação óssea foi estatisticamente similar nos grupos Bio-Oss® (Vvi = 27%), GenOx® Inorg (Vvi = 26%) e GenPhos® XP (Vvi = 20%) porém, o GenOx® Inorg promoveu a formação de um tecido ósseo mais organizado e com maior acúmulo de biomaterial+osso+medula óssea (Vvi = 67,9%) comparado ao GenPhos® XP (Vvi =58,9%) e Bio Oss (Vvi = 55,6%) mas, inferior ao do enxerto autógeno (Vvi = 78%). Os resultados aqui obtidos permitem concluir que o osso autógeno promove rápida formação e maturação óssea, porém não consegue promover o reestabelecimento completo da díploe removida cirurgicamente. Os materiais BioOss, GenOx® Inorg e GenPhos® XP são excelentes materiais osteocondutores levando a formação óssea em toda extensão do defeito, sendo o GenOx® Inorg o que apresenta menor grau de reabsorção e maior e melhor preenchimento do defeito. / One major challenge for treatment of critical size defects in maxillofacial region has been the development of a substitute biomaterial to the autogenous bone grafts. In present study we evaluated the bone formation and biodegradability of deproteinized bovine bone Bio-Oss® and GenOx® Inorg, and biphasic calcium phosphate GenPhos XP® during bone repair process in rabbits cranial defects compared to autogenous bone (positive control) and blood clot (negative control). In parietal bone of 39 rabbits were made bilateral 8-mm diameter defects, which were filled randomly with 0,1cm3 material or clot as each treatment group. After periods of 4, 8 and 24 weeks skulls of animals were collected, analyzed the MicroCT scanner and histologically processed. The percentage of defect volume occupied by biomaterial and new-formed bone were assessed by histomorphometry and microtomography, while the bone marrow, connective tissue and tegument only by first analysis. The quantitative data were compared by two-way ANOVA analysis (time and treatment) and Tukey\'s test at p <0.05. The intensity of the linear association of MicroCT and morphometric data evaluated by the Pearson correlation coefficient, showed moderate to strong correlation. In the early repair periods (30 and 60 days), the defects treated with Bio- Oss, GenOx® Inorg and GenPhos® XP showed maintenance of the graft material volume (average Vvi of 34%) and lower and more immature bone compared autograft group (Vvi = 22% vs. 32% in the autograft group). In the later period (180 days) the amount of bone formation was statistically similar to the groups Bio-Oss® (Vvi = 27 %), GenOx® Inorg (Vvi = 26%) and GenPhos® XP (Vvi = 20%) however, the bone formation in GenOx® Inorg was more organized and with greater accumulation of particles + bone tissue + bone marrow (Vvi = 67.9%), when compared to GenPhos® XP (Vvi = 58.9%) and Bio-Oss® (Vvi = 55.6%) but lower than the autograft (Vvi = 78%). It was concluded that the autogenous bone promotes rapid bone formation and maturation, but cannot promote the complete reestablishment of diploe surgically removed. The Bio-Oss®, GenOx® Inorg and GenPhos® XP are excellent osteoconductive materials leading to bone formation in the full extent of the defects, and the GenOx® Inorg showing less absorption promotes more and better defect filling.
2

Avaliação microtomográfica e histomorfométrica do processo de reparo de defeitos ósseos em calvária de coelhos tratados com diferentes materiais de enxerto / Microtomographic and histomorphometric evaluation of bone repair in rabbit cranial defects treated with different graft materials

Ricardo Vinicius Nunes Arantes 08 July 2016 (has links)
Um dos grandes desafios para o tratamento de defeitos ósseos extensos na região bucomaxilofacial têm sido o desenvolvimento de um biomaterial substituto ósseo ao enxerto autógeno. No presente trabalho avaliou-se a formação óssea e a biodegrabilidade do osso desproteinizado bovino Bio-Oss® e do seu similar GenOx Inorg® e da cerâmica bifásica GenPhos® XP no processo de reparo de defeitos ósseos cranianos em coelhos, comparativamente ao osso autógeno (controle positivo) e coágulo sanguíneo (controle negativo). Foram realizados cirurgicamente defeitos bilaterais de 8-mm de diâmetro nos ossos parietais de 39 coelhos. A seguir os defeitos foram preenchidos aleatoriamente com 0,1cm3 de material ou coágulo conforme cada grupo de tratamento. Após os períodos de 4, 8 e 24 semanas os crânios foram coletados, analisados no microtomógrafo e processados histologicamente. O percentual de volume do defeito ocupado pelo material e osso neoformado foi avaliado pela microtomografia e histomorfometria, enquanto que, para a medula óssea, tegumento e tecido conjuntivo, apenas pela análise histomorfométrica. Os resultados quantitativos obtidos foram comparados estatisticamente pela ANOVA a dois critérios (período e tratamento) e teste de Tukey com p<0,05. A intensidade da associação linear dos dados microtomográficos e histomorfométricos avaliada pelo coeficiente de correlação de Pearson, mostraram correlação moderada a forte. Nos períodos iniciais de reparo (30 e 60 dias), os defeitos tratados com Bio-Oss®, GenOx® Inorg e GenPhos® XP apresentaram manutenção do volume do material enxertado (Vvi médio de 34% ) e formação óssea menor e mais imatura em relação grupo autógeno (Vvi = 22% vs. 32% no grupo autógeno). No período mais tardio (180 dias) a quantidade de formação óssea foi estatisticamente similar nos grupos Bio-Oss® (Vvi = 27%), GenOx® Inorg (Vvi = 26%) e GenPhos® XP (Vvi = 20%) porém, o GenOx® Inorg promoveu a formação de um tecido ósseo mais organizado e com maior acúmulo de biomaterial+osso+medula óssea (Vvi = 67,9%) comparado ao GenPhos® XP (Vvi =58,9%) e Bio Oss (Vvi = 55,6%) mas, inferior ao do enxerto autógeno (Vvi = 78%). Os resultados aqui obtidos permitem concluir que o osso autógeno promove rápida formação e maturação óssea, porém não consegue promover o reestabelecimento completo da díploe removida cirurgicamente. Os materiais BioOss, GenOx® Inorg e GenPhos® XP são excelentes materiais osteocondutores levando a formação óssea em toda extensão do defeito, sendo o GenOx® Inorg o que apresenta menor grau de reabsorção e maior e melhor preenchimento do defeito. / One major challenge for treatment of critical size defects in maxillofacial region has been the development of a substitute biomaterial to the autogenous bone grafts. In present study we evaluated the bone formation and biodegradability of deproteinized bovine bone Bio-Oss® and GenOx® Inorg, and biphasic calcium phosphate GenPhos XP® during bone repair process in rabbits cranial defects compared to autogenous bone (positive control) and blood clot (negative control). In parietal bone of 39 rabbits were made bilateral 8-mm diameter defects, which were filled randomly with 0,1cm3 material or clot as each treatment group. After periods of 4, 8 and 24 weeks skulls of animals were collected, analyzed the MicroCT scanner and histologically processed. The percentage of defect volume occupied by biomaterial and new-formed bone were assessed by histomorphometry and microtomography, while the bone marrow, connective tissue and tegument only by first analysis. The quantitative data were compared by two-way ANOVA analysis (time and treatment) and Tukey\'s test at p <0.05. The intensity of the linear association of MicroCT and morphometric data evaluated by the Pearson correlation coefficient, showed moderate to strong correlation. In the early repair periods (30 and 60 days), the defects treated with Bio- Oss, GenOx® Inorg and GenPhos® XP showed maintenance of the graft material volume (average Vvi of 34%) and lower and more immature bone compared autograft group (Vvi = 22% vs. 32% in the autograft group). In the later period (180 days) the amount of bone formation was statistically similar to the groups Bio-Oss® (Vvi = 27 %), GenOx® Inorg (Vvi = 26%) and GenPhos® XP (Vvi = 20%) however, the bone formation in GenOx® Inorg was more organized and with greater accumulation of particles + bone tissue + bone marrow (Vvi = 67.9%), when compared to GenPhos® XP (Vvi = 58.9%) and Bio-Oss® (Vvi = 55.6%) but lower than the autograft (Vvi = 78%). It was concluded that the autogenous bone promotes rapid bone formation and maturation, but cannot promote the complete reestablishment of diploe surgically removed. The Bio-Oss®, GenOx® Inorg and GenPhos® XP are excellent osteoconductive materials leading to bone formation in the full extent of the defects, and the GenOx® Inorg showing less absorption promotes more and better defect filling.
3

Effect of growth factors on the osteoinductive potential of Hydroxyapatite β-Tricalcium Phosphate (HA-TCP).

Chan, Raymond Chun Wai January 2010 (has links)
The replacement of missing teeth by osseointegrated dental implants is a commonly utilised treatment option in dentistry. However, successful treatment outcomes are dependent on sufficient bone quantity in the proposed surgical site for implant placement (Buser et al., 2004). Surgical augmentation of bone defects is commonly performed prior to or during implant placement. Bone augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus or guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures of alveolar ridge defects have utilised a variety of bone graft materials in block or particulate form, either alone or in combination with resorbable or non-resorbable barrier membranes. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether Hydroxyapatite β-Tricalcium Phosphate (HA-TCP) either alone or combined with Enamel Matrix Derivative (EMD) or recombinant human Platelet Derived Growth Factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB) is osteoinductive when implanted into a nonosseous site. Methods: Twenty CD-1 adult male mice underwent intramuscular implantation into both hindlimbs of an empty gelatine capsule or a gelatine capsule containing one of the following: 10 mg of uncoated particulate HA-TCP, (Straumann Bone Ceramic®, HA-TCP), EMD coated HA-TCP, (Emdogain®, HATCP + EMD) or rhPDGF-BB coated HA-TCP (HA-TCP + PDGF). Ten animals were sacrificed at four and eight weeks with five specimens from each group retrieved at each time point. The area of graft placement was radiographed and after graft retrieval, a semi-quantitative histological examination was performed with the aim of assessing the inflammatory changes, reparative processes and osteoinduction within the graft site. Results: At both 4 and 8 weeks, histological analysis failed to demonstrate any osteoinductive activity in any of the specimens from the three experimental groups. A minimal chronic inflammatory response and foreign body reaction was seen in the experimental groups which reduced over time. The particles were embedded within fibrous connective tissue and were encapsulated by a dense cellular layer consisting of active fibroblasts and occasional macrophages with the thickness of this layer decreasing over time. At 4 weeks, a greater density of the fibrous connective tissue was demonstrated in the HA-TCP + EMD group (P<0.001) while a greater thickness in the capsule thickness was seen in the HA-TCP group (P=0.022) although no differences were seen after 8 weeks. Greater neovascularisation was seen in the HA-TCP + PDGF group after 8 weeks (P=0.043) while greater amounts of adipose tissue surrounding the particles were detected in the HA-TCP + PDGF group at 4 weeks (P=0.002) and in the HA-TCP + EMD group at eight weeks (P=0.002). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the use of commercially available HA-TCP alone or in combination with EMD or rhPDGF-BB is biocompatible but not osteoinductive in the murine model. / http://proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/login?url= http://library.adelaide.edu.au/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?BBID=1522641 / Thesis (D.Clin.Dent.) -- University of Adelaide, School of Dentistry, 2010

Page generated in 0.0853 seconds