Cette thèse s’intéresse à la manière dont le livre de Jérémie (Jr) insère des oracles dans un récit ; pour cela, elle analyse les oracles destinés à cinq personnages secondaires en les resituant dans leur contexte narratif. Alors que les études diachroniques, majoritaires au xxe siècle, se révèlent insuffisantes pour rendre compte du sens de Jr dans son état final, cette recherche se situe dans le cadre des analyses synchroniques de ce livre, développées depuis quelques décennies. Avant d’aborder l’analyse proprement dite, deux préalables sont nécessaires, où se rencontrent théorie narrative, syntaxe hébraïque, et spécificités de Jr : l’étude des caractéristiques et des rapports entre la forme de la narration et celle du discours rapporté ; l’étude des différents types de personnages apparus au long de l’histoire de la littérature et des catégories adaptées à l’analyse de ceux de Jr. Sont alors étudiés les oracles destinés à Pashehour fils d’Immer, Eved-Mélek, Baruch, Guedalias, et Sédécias. L’effet-personnage manifeste rapidement sa limitation, et appelle à chercher ailleurs que dans la fable des réponses aux énigmesposées par la mise en récit. La découverte d’échos et résonances verbales entre des oracles précédents et la mise en récit des personnages permet de reconstruire la causalité des jugements divins exprimés dans les oracles. Ce résultat exégétique rencontre la catégorie théologique de la révélation, remettant en cause les paradigmes sur lesquels elle s’est construite tant aux débuts du christianisme qu’à Vatican ii. L’interprétation théologique des capacités acquises par le lecteur offre alors une nouvelle assise pour penser la révélation de la paternité de Dieu / This thesis is interested in how oracles are inserted in a narration in the book of Jeremiah (Jr) ; for this purpose the oracles destined to five secondary characters are analyzed by reframing them into their narrative context. Since the diachronic studies, which were the majority in the xxth century, cannot account for the meaning of the final stage of the text of Jr in a satisfying manner, this research takes part to the synchronic way of analyzing this book developed in the last decades. Before the intended analysis, two preambles must be studied, at the crossing of narrative theory, Hebrew syntax, and specificities of Jr : the characteristics and relations of the literary forms of narration and reported speech ; the different types of characters along the history of literature and the best-fitted categories for analyzing Jr’s characters. Then are studied the oracles intended for Pashhur son of Immer, Ebed-Melech, Baruch, Gedaliah, and Zedekiah. The « character-effect » soon appears to be quite limited, calling for a solution situated out of the fabula to the puzzle created by the narration. The causality for the divine judgments expressed in the oracles can be reconstructed thanks to the discovery of verbal echoes and resonances between preceding oracles and the narrativization of characters. This exegetical result intersects with the theology of revelation and challenges the paradigms upon which it was built both at the beginning of Christianism and at Vatican ii. The thinking of the revelation of the paternity of God can be founded anew upon a theological interpretation of the reader’s new capacities

The 21 inscribed ceramic sherds (or ostraca) known as the "Lachish Letters", which were discovered during the British Mandate Period excavations of Tell ed-Duweir (Lachish), underwent eighty years of scholarship that improved our understanding of at least some of these inscriptions. The archive is terse and fragmentary, and the least well-preserved and faded ostraca from this collection have been seriously overlooked, ironically when the "Lachish Letters" have more or less been regarded as a homogenous group of documents written during the final decades of the Judahite kingdom. Some of the ostraca were discovered in different stratigraphic contexts and pertaining to different settings, if not timeframes. The principal aim of this study is to produce an updated edition of these ostraca by objectively and systematically reassessing and understanding these artefacts, the inscriptions they bear, and their respective stratigraphic layers and archaeological contexts. This is carried out by integrating past studies and modern-day developments on the ostraca (and the site itself) from different perspectives: archaeology, palaeography, philology, the Hebrew Bible, and Classical Hebrew studies. This interdisciplinary approach enables a revision of outstanding controversial issues and a dismissal of outdated proposals on the readings, interpretation, and import of these ostraca in their contemporary world. Despite the illegibility of some inscriptions, this study pays attention to all 21 ostraca via physical examination under the lens, to confirm or deny any dubious readings as far as the naked eye can tell us. A crucial criterion is the integration of photographic data and written documentation gathered from unpublished and archived material of the Mandate Period that were accessible to the author at the time of writing. The study concludes that this surviving group of ostraca is far from homogeneous, and there still exist lacunae in their historico-archaeological contexts and interpretations. Our understanding of the source and function of the ostraca (especially the few legible messages and lists of names) remains riddled with controversies, which derive from the fragmentary nature of the corpus and the limitations in the documentation and preservation of these artefacts.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-03T12:18:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 IGOR POHL.pdf: 2150293 bytes, checksum: 123d8bb07ab5521c47aa2bdb3ba7047d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-11-25 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / A presente dissertação se situa no campo das Ciências da Religião. É um estudo da perícope de Jeremias 20.7-18 na perspectiva do fenômeno de lamentação na área da literatura e religião do mundo bíblico. Jeremias 20.7-18 é um dos textos de lamentação representativos dentre os que se encontram fora do saltério, na literatura profética. O tema desenvolvido visa analisar este salmo em sua forma, lugar e conteúdo na perspectiva da linguagem de lamentação. O conteúdo que nos atemos foram as imagens de Yhwh reconhecidas na perícope: sedutor irresistível, Deus violento, fogo consumidor, guerreiro violento e vingativo, Senhor dos exércitos, libertador do pobre e subversor das cidades impenitentes. O estudo desta perícope foi possível mediante a compreensão da linguagem de lamentação como um fenômeno religioso universal. Localizamos a lamentação na sociedade do antigo Oriente Próximo, pois foi o contexto que tornou possível tal experiência para o antigo Israel. A lamentação na história da religião de Israel só é possível ser construída a partir de hipóteses. As hipóteses para uma história da lamentação em Israel que averiguamos nesta dissertação foram distribuídas entre o período pré-exílico, exílico e pós-exílico, a partir dos principais textos de lamento que marcam tal linguagem em cada período. Reconhecemos o gênero de lamentação nos documentos sagrados de Israel, como gênero literário e as estruturas simbólicas que permeiam os salmos de lamentação. Dessa forma, nos aproximamos da linguagem de lamentação de Jeremias 20.7-18 como parte do fenômeno do antigo Israel. Portanto, a linguagem de lamentação se torna a linguagem do sofrimento. Em outras palavras, a lamentação dá voz ao ser que sofre. O livro de Jeremias se situa num período de intenso sofrimento e violência contra a nação de Israel. É adequado, pois, no âmbito das lamentações, a presença deste salmo peculiar no livro seu profético. Com isso, estudamos exegeticamente nossa perícope perguntando o seu gênero principal. Em seguida, verificamos o lugar vivencial e, em termos de conteúdo quais são as imagens ou quadros ali demonstrados e como os dois se ajustam.

The crux of Jeremiah’s message depicted in the book of Jeremiah is the upcoming Babylonian invasion on Judah as a result of their sins and the unusual call on Judah to yield to the Babylonians. Jeremiah’s prophecy to the Judeans claimed that foreign invasion would result in the destruction of the nation and exile of its inhabitants. For this, he faced grave animosity from the recipients of his message especially the kings and the prophets and he even suffered persecution under them. The reasons for the hostility against him as portrayed in the book are investigated. The book of Jeremiah highlights that after the invasion, the Babylonians showed a special concern to Jeremiah and gave him privilege to choose whether he would go to Babylon or stay behind in Judah. Strangely, the prophet, who emphasized that the nation of Judah should not resist the Babylonian rule and should be exiled to Babylon, when given a choice, chose to stay behind in Judah. This appears to be a strange response of Jeremiah toward Babylonian exile. Also, when the Johanan faction forced Jeremiah to flee from Judah and find asylum in Egypt to escape another suspected Babylonian threat, Jeremiah responds negatively. The various responses of the kings, prophets and Jeremiah toward the destruction and exile require explanation. At the outset, the reason why there was fierce hostility against Jeremiah’s message appears to be Judah’s reluctance to be subdued by a foreign nation as the biblical text portrays. However, the book of Jeremiah appears to use many metaphors to point to the reasons for resentment against Jeremiah and his message. The study of the metaphors in Jeremiah employing cognitive linguistics methodology, using conceptual metaphor theory and conceptual blending theory has shown the interconnectedness of the metaphors and the meanings it implies. The metaphors of “destruction” and “exile” are found to be connected to the concept of shame. Jeremiah’s prediction of the forthcoming destruction of the land, cities, Temple, exile of Judeans, collapse of the Davidic throne and all kinds of calamities that would befall the city of Jerusalem and the nation of Judah is found to be associated with “shame.” Likewise, the metaphor of “restoration” is found to be connected to the concept of honour. Jeremiah’s prophecy of “restoration” is portrayed as replenishment of land, rebuilding of cities, return of the exiles, and restoration from all kinds of calamities termed as “return of honour.” This shows that the concepts of honour and shame play a key role to explain the antagonistic responses toward Jeremiah’s prophecy of the Babylonian invasion and exile. Also, by using conceptual metaphor analysis, Jeremiah’s reluctance to go to Babylon or Egypt can be explained as his anticipation to witness the restoration of the nation of Judah and return of its honour as Yahweh had promised.