This study was conducted with the aim to investigate the efficacy of exogenous enzyme supplementation in releasing metabolisable energy in broiler feeds. Two performance trials were conducted during this study. Effects were measured in terms of the body weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, mortality and production efficiency factor in broilers. Correct interpretation and practical application of the positive effects of exogenous enzyme supplementation to commercial broiler feeds can aid nutritionists to develop nutritionally balanced broiler feeds at lower costs. The negative effects of anti-nutritional factors in broilers feeds can be greatly reduced with the strategic use of exogenous enzyme addition to the feed. In the first performance trial, four treatment feeds were fed to broilers. The Positive control feed was a balanced diet, formulated according to standard nutrient specifications used by Daybreak Farms, with only the metabolisable energy marginally lower than the standard to ensure that energy was the first limiting nutrient. Nutrient specification met or exceeded recommendations by the NRC (1994). A Negative control feed, similar to the Positive control, was formulated with 0.35 MJ ME / kg feed less than the Positive control. An Avizyme treatment and a Hemicell treatment were formulated similar to the Negative control, with the addition of 0.05% Avizyme and 0.0125% Hemicell to the respective treatments. The addition of Avizyme and Hemicell to the respective treatments was hypothesised to release an additional 0.35 MJ ME / kg feed. Four thousand three hundred and twenty day-old Ross 788 chicks were randomly divided into four treatment groups, each with eight replicates and 135 birds per replicate for the first seven days. After seven days birds were reduced to 126 birds per replicate. In the second performance trial, five treatment feeds were fed to broilers. The Positive control feed was a balanced diet, formulated according to standard nutrient specifications used by Daybreak Farms, with only the metabolisable energy marginally lower than the standard to ensure that energy was the first limiting nutrient. Nutrient specification met or exceeded recommendations by the NRC (1994). Results of the first performance trial indicated that more than the hypothesised 0.35 MJ ME / kg feed was being released from the feed with exogenous enzyme addition. Subsequently, the difference in metabolisable energy between the Negative control and Positive control treatments were increased for the second trial. A Negative control feed, similar to the Positive control, was formulated with 0.45 MJ ME / kg feed less than the Positive control. An Avizyme treatment and a Hemicell treatment were formulated similar to the Negative control, with the addition of 0.05% Avizyme and 0.0125% Hemicell to the respective treatments. A Combination treatment was formulated similar to the Negative control, with the addition of both 0.05% Avizyme and 0.0125% Hemicell to the feed. Seven thousand five hundred and sixty day-old Ross 788 chicks were randomly divided into five treatment groups, each with 12 replicates and 126 birds per replicate. For both trials, birds were housed in environmentally controlled houses with a similar lighting schedule and ad libitum access to feed and water. Body weights, feed intake and mortality were recorded weekly for the duration of the five week performance trials. The data was statistically analysed, using the general linear model function in SAS (Statistical Analysis Systems, 1989; Statistical Analysis Systems, 1994). Fischer’s protected test was used for the post hoc multiple comparison test. Repeated tests were included in the model. The confidence interval was set at 95%. Initial body weight was tested as a covariate in all the analyses. Incorrect dosing of the trial feeds during the first performance trial prevented the evaluation of the treatments for the entire 35 day period. The difference between the Positive control and the Negative control treatments were not large enough to enable the exact determination of the amount of metabolisable energy that the Avizyme released in the feed. It could, however, be concluded that Avizyme addition to a broiler feed increased broiler production efficacy. The Avizyme treatment was contributed at least 0.35 MJ ME / kg feed during the trial released more than 0.35 MJ ME / kg feed during the extended starter phase of the trial. The above mentioned conclusions served as a motivation to increase the metabolisable energy difference between the Positive control and the Negative control treatments for the next performance trial. Addition of Hemicell to the feed contributed 0.35 MJ ME / kg feed over a five week growing period. With the second performance trial, the Avizyme and Hemicell treatments released an additional 0.45 MJ ME / kg feed, supported by broiler production variables similar to the Positive treatment. The Combination treatment was shown to release more than 0.45 MJ ME / kg feed and significantly increased broiler performance. It was concluded that the combination of Hemicell and Avizyme in a broiler ration had a positive synergistic effect on each other in the young broiler, indicating that exogenous enzymes could be more effective in younger broilers. Although exogenous enzymes resulted in the release of a significant amount of additional metabolisable energy in the feed, the addition of these enzymes should undergo economical evaluation to ensure that the addition of these enzymes is viable under commercial circumstances. Addition of Avizyme with a calculated energy contribution of 0.35 MJ ME / kg and 0.45 MJ ME / kg to the feed realised an income over feed cost (IOFC) of 25 c / kg live weight and 4 c / kg live weight, respectively, during the five week period. The Hemicell treatment showed a negative IOFC (suggesting that Hemicell inclusion will decrease profit) of 24 c / kg live weight during the first four weeks of the first production trial and an IOFC of 2 c / kg live weight during the five week period of the second trial. The combination of both enzymes in the feed returned an IOFC of 16 c / kg live weight. In general the income over feed cost was the highest during the starter phase because of a higher efficacy of exogenous enzyme addition in younger broilers. / Dissertation (MSc(Agric))--University of Pretoria, 2012. / Animal and Wildlife Sciences / unrestricted