In 2006, a baseline survey for the UNEP/GEF-IAS Project was conducted in BFR to assess the status of IAS in the area. Findings indicated that extensive forest parts had severe S. spectabilis encroachment which appeared to interfere with the normal functioning and productivity of the forest. This study was motivated by the magnitude of S. spectabilis invasion in BFR, the level of public and government concern about the invasion, and the magnitude of the IAS problem across East Africa. This study was thus undertaken to address a specific need of the research and capacity building components of the UNEP/GEF-IAS Project. The study1 was carried out to assess the impacts of S. spectabilis invasion on the productivity of BFR and the socio-economic implications on the livelihoods of the dependent stakeholders (local resident population, timber suppliers and the tourism sector). The study used descriptive statistics to assess the levels of awareness of S. spectabilis invasion, perceptions and knowledge of the conservation values of BFR, knowledge on the benefits and costs of living with S. spectabilis and impacts of S. spectabilis on the flow of quantities and revenues from the benefits it generates. The impact on financial profitability and efficiency of timber firms was assessed using Gross margin analysis (GMA) and financial efficiency ratio analysis respectively. The impact on the population structure of chimpanzees was studied using mean differentials and focused group discussions. Results indicate that the level of awareness about S. spectabilis invasion and the knowledge of the conservation values of BFR were high among all the three stakeholder groups. GMA revealed that S. spectabilis invasion increases variable costs in timber production thus reducing profit margins and financial efficiency of timber firms. Alteration of habitat environment occasioned by S. spectabilis invasion was advanced, though with uncertainty, as a possible reason for the difference in chimpanzee numbers between the infested and non infested forest conditions. Like other IAS, S. spectabilis was found to have both benefits and costs though the distribution of the same differs. S. spectabilis can be considered a net benefit to the local dependent communities whereas it may be a net loss to both the timber and tourism sectors. Conflict of interest in S. spectabilis management is discussed and possible solutions suggested. It was recommended that the threat of invasive species should be tackled through a multisectoral approach. / Dissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2009. / Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development / unrestricted

Finding food in tropical forests poses a potentially major problem for chimpanzees, whose ranging is thought primarily to be directed at locating suitable food resources: (1) chimpanzees are frugivorous, large bodied and live in large home ranges; (2) they lack specialised sensory or locomotor abilities, and terrestrial travel is known to be costly; but (3) fruits are randomly distributed in space and time. Evidence from studies of captive individuals suggests chimpanzees are capable of remembering the locations of out of sight resources and can compute least distance routes to these resources, but whether this ability translates to the natural foraging behaviour of wild chimpanzees has never been investigated. My observational study was designed to assess how the chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) of Budongo Forest, Uganda, locate these patchy resources. I mapped the routes of 14 focal individuals over a 12-month period. I considered how these foraging routes were structured by breaking the path into segments of travel between resources. Consecutive segments of travel between resources were found not to be independent, but assembled into "super-segments" that take in a number of resources along one trajectory. These super-segments are not necessarily directed towards feeding resources, however: travel is not always food directed. Comparisons of actual chimpanzee routes with randomly generated simulations suggest most individuals do not attempt to minimise their travel distances. There is evidence to suggest energetically stressed individuals can remember the locations of recently visited food resources and return to these patches in order to minimise travel distances when necessary, but overall, food is not difficult to find for this community of chimpanzees. I propose this is because males defend a territory with super-abundant food resources, meaning availability is not a limiting factor of foraging. Male chimpanzees can be characterised as convenience feeders, taking food whilst satisfying other, social needs.

Black-and-white colobus monkeys are renowned for their impressive vocal behaviour, but up to date there have been only very few systematic efforts to study this. These monkeys are able to produce loud and low-pitched roars that transmit over long distances, which has lead to the assumption that these calls function in inter-group spacing and male-male competition. The fact that the monkeys sometimes produce the same calls to predators as well, has not received much attention so far. This thesis presents a detailed description of the form and function of the anti-predator behaviour of one species of black-and-white colobus monkeys, the Guereza (Colobus guereza), with a specific focus on their alarm calling behaviour. A second aim was to determine the effects of predator experience on their anti-predator behaviour, with a specific focus on call comprehension and production. Data were collected from two populations of Guereza monkeys in the Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda, that differ in predation pressures experienced by their main predators: leopards, eagles and chimpanzees. Results showed that Guerezas use a basic form of zoo-syntax in order to compose predator-specific call sequences that vary in the number of roaring phrases and snorts. These sequences are meaningful to recipients, at least at the level of the predator class, but there were also indications for additional levels of encoded information: Guerezas appear to have evolved a second system, based on acoustic variants of individual phrases, which allows them to narrow down the information content of call sequences, generating the potential to communicate highly specific information by using a mix of syntactic and semantic cues. The monkeys’ vocal behaviour was influenced by predator experience, but not strongly so. Monkeys without prior experience with leopards lacked some of the behavioural nuances seen in leopard-experienced monkeys, but they nevertheless responded appropriately to visual and acoustic leopard models, suggesting they had retained the basic capacities to recognise this predator type as relevant and dangerous. Results are discussed in light of the comparative approach to the study of human language evolution. Although human language is unique in a number of ways, for example through its use of complex syntax and intentional semantics, some animal communication systems have revealed similar features, and Guerezas, the first member of the colobine family to be studied in this respect, are no exception. The Guerezas’ alarm calling behaviour is complex and flexible, and these monkeys have provided another piece of empirical evidence that is directly relevant for the comparative approach to human language evolution.