Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-10-18T20:22:23Z No. of bitstreams: 1 BrunaRamalhoSarmento_TESE.pdf: 22364397 bytes, checksum: be4e5fc4faa1a0f5a39b77e166357fc6 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-10-19T21:21:46Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 BrunaRamalhoSarmento_TESE.pdf: 22364397 bytes, checksum: be4e5fc4faa1a0f5a39b77e166357fc6 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-19T21:21:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 BrunaRamalhoSarmento_TESE.pdf: 22364397 bytes, checksum: be4e5fc4faa1a0f5a39b77e166357fc6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-06-20 / Os campi de Institui??es Federais de Ensino Superior (IFES) brasileiras proliferaram a partir da d?cada de 1960/70, se desenvolveram lentamente durante a segunda metade do s?culo XX e, na ?ltima d?cada, passaram por intensas mudan?as na estrutura f?sica, as quais podem vir a incidir sobre sua qualidade ambiental (QA) e, consequentemente, sobre a qualidade de vida (QV) da popula??o usu?ria. Considerando essa problem?tica, a tese tomou como objeto de cificamente, duas institui??es: a Universidade Federal da Para?ba (UFPB) e a Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN). Um olhar inicial sobre as IFES produziu a pergunta de partida que conduziu esta pesquisa: O SEL dos campi centrais dessas IFES oferece QA e, consequentemente, QV aos seus usu?rios? Respondendo a essa quest?o, as hip?teses trabalhadas foram: a) Ap?s mais de 50 anos de cria??o dos campi, a crescente ocupa??o fez com que o SEL das IFES apresentem poucos e dispersos ELs; b) A QA do SEL dos campi das IFES pesquisadas n?o oferece caracter?sticas que contribuam para a QV dos usu?rios; c) A QA do SEL das IFES n?o atende aos anseios dos seus usu?rios, oferecendo ELs pouco atrativos ? comunidade. A fim de empreender essa discuss?o, o objetivo geral do estudo foi compreender o SEL de duas universidades federais brasileiras (UFPB e UFRN), visando tra?ar diretrizes para contribuir com sua QA. Subsidiando a investiga??o, foram estabelecidos como recortes espaciais: o Campus I da UFPB e o Campus Central da UFRN, com rela??o aos quais foram delimitados cinco objetivos espec?ficos: a) Verificar como se deu a ocupa??o do espa?o nos campi em estudo e os seus ELs remanescentes; b) Caracterizar o SEL existente e categorizar seu uso e potencialidades; c) Analisar dimens?es ambientais para a manuten??o da QA do SEL; d) Identificar a compreens?o dos usu?rios sobre os SEL das IFES pesquisadas, de modo a avaliar a adequa??o destes espa?os ?s suas necessidades/aspira??es; e) Tra?ar diretrizes de ordena??o do sistema. Nesse contexto, metodologicamente a investiga??o correspondeu a um estudo de caso m?ltiplo, utilizando como estrat?gia de pesquisa a Avalia??o P?s Ocupa??o efetuada por meio de abordagem multim?todos, que, para al?m da gera??o de um vasto diagn?stico, promoveu uma reflex?o sobre o SEL em ambiente universit?rio. Os resultados obtidos mostraram que, nas duas institui??es investigadas, o n?mero de ELs ? consider?vel, no entanto, sua QA ? question?vel, de modo que parte deles n?o ? percebida e, consequentemente, utilizada, pela comunidade. As diretrizes de ordena??o do SEL em campi universit?rios, com vistas ? promo??o da QA do SEL e da QV dos usu?rios, priorizam dimens?es de ordem ambiental, seguran?a, mobilidade e servi?os do apoio. / The campuses of Brazilian Federal Institutions of Higher Education (IFES) proliferated from the decade of 1960/70, developed slowly during the second half of the XX century and, in the last decade, have undergone intense changes in the physical structure, which may affect their environmental quality (QA) and, consequently, the quality of life (QV) of the population. Considering this issue, the thesis took as the subject of study the relationship between users and open space system (SEL) in the Northeast region of Brazil, working specifically with two institutions: the Federal University of Para?ba (UFPB) and the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN). An initial look at the IFES produced the starting question that led to this research: Does SEL of the central campuses of these IFES offer QA and, consequently, QV to its users? Responding to this question, the hypotheses worked were: a) After more than 50 years of building the campuses, a growing occupation with which the SEL of the IFES presents few and dispersed ELs; b) The QA of SEL of the IFES campuses surveyed does not offer features that contribute to users' QV; c) The QA of SEL of the IFES does not answer to the yearnings of the users, offering ELs that are not attractive to the community. In order to undertake this discussion, the general objective of the study was to understand the SEL of two Brazilian Federal Universities (UFPB and UFRN), to establish guidelines to contribute to your QA. By subsidizing research, were established space clippings: the Campus I UFPB and the Campus Center UFRN, with respect to which five specific objectives were delimited: with regard to five specific objectives were defined: a) Verify how was the space occupation of the campuses under study and their remaining ELs; b) Characterize the existing SEL and categorize the use and potentialities; c) Analyze environmental dimensions for the maintenance of SEL QA; d) Identify the users' understanding of the SELs of the IFES researched, in order to assess the suitability of these spaces for their needs/aspirations; e) Draw system-ranking guidelines. In this context, the research methodologically corresponded to a multiple case study, using as a research strategy the Post-occupation evaluation carried out through a multi-method approach, which, in addition to the generation of a vast diagnosis, promoted a reflection on SEL in a university environment. The results obtained showed that, in the two investigated institutions, the number of ELs is considerable, however, their QA is questionable, so that some of them are not perceived and, consequently, used by the community. The SEL ordering guidelines on university campuses, with a view to promoting SEL QA and QV of users, prioritize environmental, security, mobility and support services dimensions.