Current models of cancer care delivery in Canada are unsustainable due to the rapidly increasing number of cancer survivors at a time when there is a shortage of human and financial resources. With improvements in early detection, diagnosis, and treatment; patients diagnosed with cancer are living longer. There is also growing recognition of the chronic nature of cancer. Provincial cancer agencies have introduced new models of post-treatment follow-up involving early transition of cancer survivors back to their primary care providers. There is limited research evidence about the role nurses working in primary care settings play in the delivery of post-treatment follow-up and cancer survivorship care (CSC). The purpose of this study was to identify and examine, from the perspective of registered nurses, the strengths, barriers, and opportunities for optimizing nursing roles in the delivery of CSC in primary care. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. Participants were recruited through membership lists from the College of Nurses of Ontario and the Canadian Family Practice Nurses Association Ontario and snowball sampling. Purposeful and maximum variation sampling techniques were employed. Participants completed an oral demographic questionnaire and individual semi-structured in-depth telephone interviews. Data collection and data analysis were conducted concurrently. The final study sample included 18 primary care registered nurses from 9 of 14 Local Health Integration Networks across Ontario. Overall, participants’ involvement in CSC was quite limited. Registered nurse involvement in CSC was categorized into three relevant themes: care coordination and system navigation; emotional support, and facilitating access to community resources. Barriers and facilitators to optimizing nursing involvement in CSC related to individual participant, practice setting, and primary care team factors. Participants recommended multiple strategies for expanding the role of nurses in CSC. / Thesis / Candidate in Philosophy / The current approach to cancer survivorship care (CSC) in Canada is unsustainable due to the rapidly increasing number of cancer survivors at a time when there is a shortage of human and financial resources. Patients diagnosed with cancer are living longer and there is growing recognition of the chronic nature of cancer survivorship. Provincial cancer agencies have introduced new models of post-treatment follow-up involving earlier transition of cancer survivors from specialist care back to their primary care providers. Currently, there is a gap in research evidence regarding the role nurses working in primary care settings play in the delivery of CSC. This thesis will describe the results of a qualitative descriptive study that identified and examined the strengths, gaps, barriers, and opportunities for optimizing nursing roles in the delivery of CSC within primary care settings from the perspective of registered nurses practicing in primary care.

Over 1 million Americans are diagnosed with cancer in a given year and currently there are approximately 12 million cancer survivors in the United States. With improved detection strategies and medical advances, the number of cancer survivors continues to rise, making survivorship care an increasingly important phase along the continuum of cancer care. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the emerging field of survivorship care, including care planning and follow-up, in survivors of different types of cancer. We quantitatively evaluated the post-treatment care received by 123 cancer survivors, including the use of survivorship care plans and the impact of these care plans and subsequent follow-up on a variety of behavioral health outcomes. We qualitatively assessed survivorship care providers' (n = 8) perspectives on comprehensive survivorship care and experiences delivering post-treatment services. The majority of participants (54%) are receiving a moderate level of survivorship care, including minimal receipt of a written care plan (31%) and some amount of referrals for mental health, diet, and physical activity (28%). Results suggest significantly lower general psychological distress (F [1, 104] = 8.316, p = .005) and higher coping self-efficacy (F [1, 104] = 6.627, p = .011) for those who received some form of written care plan versus those who did not. These results imply that written care plan documents have the potential to lead to higher psychosocial functioning for survivors of cancer. The qualitative data provide initial evidence supporting the value of SCPs for patients and providers. Critical barriers to implementation of comprehensive survivorship care and SCPs, from the providers' perspective, include the fragmented healthcare system and resources. The current study is an important step toward increasing knowledge of and potential intervention targets to improve cancer survivorship experiences – from both the patients' and providers' perspectives. Future directions include developing a standardized system for delivering survivorship care and SCPs, and increasing the evidence base to examine the impact of SCPs on short- and long-term patient-reported and clinical outcomes, increase the focus on patient-centered care, and explore the impact of SCPs delivered to vulnerable groups of survivors. / Ph. D.