Spelling suggestions: "subject:"cannabinoids."" "subject:"cannabinoid.""
51 |
Effects of cannabinoid receptor interacting protein (CRIP1a) on cannabinoid (CB1) receptor functionSmith, Tricia Hardt, January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Virginia Commonwealth University, 2009. / Prepared for: Dept. of Pharmacology and Toxicology. Title from title-page of electronic thesis. Bibliography: leaves 130-143.
|
52 |
The effect of chronic constriction injury on cellular systems within nociceptive pathways in the mouseHoot, Michelle Renee, January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Virginia Commonwealth University, 2009. / Prepared for: Dept. of Pharmacology and Toxicology. Title from title-page of electronic thesis. Bibliography: leaves 84-94.
|
53 |
The total synthesis of two human urinary metabolites of delta-9-THC ; The total synthesis of (d,1)-morphine / Total synthesis of (d,1)-morphineKerr, Michael Andre January 1991 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1991. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 41-43, 244-250) / Microfiche. / xiii, 374 leaves, bound ill. 29 cm
|
54 |
Part I, The stereoselective synthesis of cannabinoids ; Part II, The total synthesis of sarcophytol A and its analogsZou, Xianglong January 1995 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1995. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 124-127). / Microfiche. / xi, 127 leaves, bound ill. 29 cm
|
55 |
The behavioural and neural effects of cannabinoids: Studies using Lewis and Wistar strain ratsArnold, Jonathon Carl January 2001 (has links)
Cannabis (known in its common forms as Cannabis sativa or Cannabis indica) is the most widely used illicit drug in the world and has been used for thousands of years for medicinal, religious and hedonistic purposes. In the last half of the 20th century the therapeutic uses of cannabis were largely ignored as most Western governments prohibited the use of the drug. Prohibition has come about largely as a result of the view that cannabis is a dangerous drug that poses major risks to both mental and physical health. However, this view is being increasingly challenged in recent years with a major popular movement towards decriminalization of cannabis occurring in some Western countries and a resurgence of interest in the medicinal properties of cannabis. Since Mechoulam and colleagues first isolated delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC) as the main psychoactive constituent of cannabis, considerable advances have been made in the pharmacology of cannabis and cannabis-like drugs (cannabinoids). Central and peripheral cannabinoid receptors have been isolated and two endogenous ligands have been discovered. In addition, two cannabinoid receptor antagonists have been developed. However, our knowledge of the behavioural, neural and emotional effects of cannabis and the cannabinoids has often lagged behind our understanding of basic cannabinoid pharmacology. The present thesis attempts to further the understanding of the behavioural, neural and emotional effects of cannabinoids, using laboratory rats as subjects. A synthetic analogue of delta 9-THC (CP 55,940), is used as the primary pharmacological tool. The thesis offers a broad perspective with three major areas of investigation. These are: 1) the effects of CP 55,940 on anxiety-related behaviour (Chapters 2 and 3); 2) the effects of CP 55,940 on patterns of brain activation as indicated by c-fos expression (Chapter 4) and; 3) the addictive potential of CP 55,940 and its capacity to produce sensitization to the effects of other drugs such as cocaine (Chapters 5 and 6). A recurring theme throughout the thesis is that genetic factors may partially determine the behavioural, neural and emotional response to cannabinoids. To this end, the thesis compares Lewis and Wistar trains of rat in a wide variety of assays. Previous research has isolated Lewis rats as an "addiction-prone" and a "cannabinoid-preferring" strain, as they are more sensitive to the rewarding effects of various drugs of abuse including cannabinoids. Conversely, cannabinoids appear to have aversive effects in Wistar rats. A long-standing puzzle in cannabinoid research has been the question of why rats do not self-administer cannabis or cannabinoids. One likely reason is that cannabinoids have predominately aversive effects in rats. It is proposed here that these aversive effects arise because cannabinoids are anxiogenic agents in most rat strains. However some evidence indicates that the Lewis strain of rat are the only strain to find cannabinoids rewarding. It is hypothesised that Lewis rats may be more susceptible to the rewarding effects of cannabinoids because they are less susceptible to the anxiogenic effects of these compounds. In Chapters 2 and 3 the anxiogenic effects of the synthetic cannabinoid agonist CP 55,940 were compared in Lewis and Wistar rats in several different animal models of anxiety. In Chapter 2, the predatory odour avoidance, open area avoidance and conditioned ultrasonic vocalization (USV) models were utilised. In the predatory odour avoidance model, rats were exposed to cat odour in a rectangular arena and given the opportunity to hide in a small box. Both Lewis and Wistar rats displayed high levels of hiding during odour exposure. In Wistar but not Lewis rats, 50 �g/kg of CP 55,940 (i.p.) enhanced this avoidance response. Unfortunately, Lewis rats showed exceptionally high avoidance of the cat odour making it difficult to discern the effects of CP 55,940. To avoid this problem a second experiment was conducted, where rats were tested in the same arena as in the first experiment but with no cat odour present. Again in Wistar, but not Lewis rats, 25 and 50 �g/kg of CP 55,940 (i.p.) increased the avoidance of the open space. In the third experiment, Lewis and Wistar rats were placed in a chamber in which they had previously received footshock. Wistar but not Lewis rats re-exposed under the influence of 10, 25 or 50 �g/kg CP 55,940 (i.p.) emitted significantly more USVs than vehicle-treated rats. Thus, CP 55,940 clearly increased anxiety-related behaviour in Wistar rats but not Lewis rats, supporting the notion of a genetic predisposition towards cannabinoid-induced anxiety. In Chapter 3 the generality of the findings made in Chapter 2 were tested by utilising two further animal models of anxiety, the social interaction and light-dark emergence tests. From the results of Chapter 2, it could be claimed that Lewis rats were merely subsensitive to the effects of CP 55,940. Therefore a higher dose range (0, 25, 50 and 75 �g/kg i.p.) of CP 55,940 was employed in Chapter 3. In addition, the rotarod test was used to assess whether CP 55,940 has ataxic effects at these doses. In the first experiment, two unfamiliar rats were placed in a large arena and the time the rats spent socially interacting was recorded. CP 55,940 significantly reduced the total time rats spent socially interacting in Lewis (25 and 75 �g/kg) and Wistar rats (50 and 75 �g/kg). However, CP 55,940 has a significantly greater effect in Wistar rats compared to Lewis rats. In the second experiment, rats were placed in a small box within a large open arena and the latency to emerge from this box was measured. CP 55,940 increased emergence latency (at 75 �g/kg) and mean time per entry into the box (at 25 and 75 �g/kg) in Wistar but not Lewis rats. Furthermore, CP 55,940 caused a greater decrease in time spent in the open arena (at 25 and 75 �g/kg) and frequency of emergence (at 75 �g/kg) in Wistar rats in comparison to Lewis rats. In the third experiment, CP 55,940 (at 25, 50 and 75 �g/kg) caused mild incoordination only in Lewis rats as measured by the rotarod test. This finding argues against the assertion that the CP 55,940-induced anxiety-like behaviours in Wistar rats are merely a result of motoric impairment. Furthermore, it illustrates that Lewis rats are not generally subsensitive to the effects of CP 55,940. That is, when compared to other rat strains, Lewis rats may be more or less sensitive to the effects of CP 55,940 depending on what behaviour is being assessed. From the results of Chapters 2 and 3 it can be seen that Lewis rats are less sensitive to the anxiogenic effects of CP 55,940 than Wistar rats. In Chapter 4 it was hypothesised that in Lewis rats the effects of CP 55,940 on neural substrates of reward far outweigh the effects the compound has on neural substrates mediating anxiety. To examine this issue, the effects of CP 55,940 at a moderate (50 �g/kg i.p.) and high (250 �g/kg i.p.) dose were observed on c-fos expression (a measure of neural activation) and behaviour in Lewis and Wistar rats. CP 55,940 dose-dependently inhibited locomotor activity and reduced body temperature with Lewis rats being significantly less affected than Wistar rats. The 250 �g/kg dose caused significant catalepsy in both strains with a significantly greater effect in Wistar rats. These strain differences in the effects of CP 55,940 on body temperature and motor behaviour clearly correlated with c-fos expression in various regions and subregions. In general, Lewis rats showed significantly less Fos-labeled cells in comparison to Wistar rats. These strain differences in the effects of CP 55,940 on c-fos expression appeared unique to cannabinoids, as cocaine (15 mg/kg i.p.) had equivalent effects on c-fos expression in Lewis and Wistar rats. CP 55,940 promoted c-fos expression in areas not previously assessed, such as the median preoptic nucleus (MnPO), medial preoptic nucleus (MPO), anterior hypothalamic area (AH), islands of Calleja (ICjM), periaqueductal gray (PAG) and the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg). The strain differences uncovered in Chapters 2 and 3 correlated well with strain differences in the effects of CP 55,940 on c-fos expression in areas implicated in cannabinoid-induced anxiety, such as the central nucleus of the amygdala, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and PAG. However, the effects of CP 55,940 on c-fos expression in a neural circuit which may underlie reward, which includes the shell of the nucleus accumbens (NAS) and PPTg, were also less in Lewis rats in comparison to Wistar rats. Future investigations must address whether the reduced effects of CP 55,940 on the Lewis rat are due to pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. In addition, future studies must reconcile the pattern of c-fos expression observed here with prior reports of the Lewis rat being a unique "cannabinoid-preferring" strain. In Chapter 4, CP 55,940 administration promoted c-fos expression in areas of the brain thought to play a critical role in behavioural sensitization such as the ventral tegmental area and NAS. This is interesting because it is possible that c-fos is involved in promoting neuroadaptations that underlie drug addiction. To examine this idea, Chapter 5 investigated a behavioural assay of the long-term neural adaptations that may occur with the chronic administration of cannabis, namely, behavioural sensitization. This chapter also examined an animal model of the "gateway hypothesis", that is, the hypothesis that prior exposure to cannabis increases an individuals vulnerability to using other drugs. This animal model is known as cross-sensitization. First it was shown that Lewis, but not Wistar rats, given cocaine (15 mg/kg i.p.) every second day over a two week period displayed a progressively greater locomotor response to the drug over days indicating behavioural sensitization. When CP 55,940 (0, 10, 25 or 50 �g/kg i.p.) was administered under a similar regime, no such sensitization was observed in either strain. Rather, the two highest doses of CP 55,940 (25 and 50 �g/kg) caused locomotor suppression that lasted throughout administration. When Lewis or Wistar rats pre-exposed ten times to CP 55,940 were challenged with cocaine (15 mg/kg), no exaggerated locomotor response to cocaine was evident relative to non pre-exposed rats. When these rats were subsequently re-tested with CP 55,940, it continued to produce a dose-dependent suppression of locomotor activity. Finally, when CP 55,940 (50 �g/kg) was co-administered with cocaine in Lewis rats, it significantly reduced the locomotor hyperactivity produced by the drug but did not block the development of behavioural sensitization to cocaine. These results show that CP 55,940 does not sensitize locomotor activity with repeated administration in the same way as cocaine, and that pre-exposure or concurrent exposure to CP 55,940 does not enhance sensitivity to the subsequent behavioural effects of cocaine. Therefore, unlike Chapters 2, 3 and 4 where strain differences were observed in CP 55,940?induced anxiety, hypothermia, catalepsy, c-fos expression and ataxia, there were no strain differences with respect to behavioural sensitization. Landmark studies by Gardner and colleagues showed that Lewis rats are particularly susceptible, in comparison to other rat strains, to the rewarding effects of delta 9-THC on: 1) medial forebrain bundle (MFB) self-stimulation behaviour and; 2) dopamine (DA) efflux in the NAS. However, in Chapter 4 Lewis rats were less susceptible than Wistar rats to CP 55,940-induced c-fos expression in the NAS. Further, Lewis rats showed no behavioural sensitization to the chronic administration of CP 55,940. In light of these findings, Chapter 6 assessed whether CP 55,940 does have a rewarding effect on MFB self-stimulation behaviour in Lewis rats. Lewis rats were trained to self-stimulate the MFB using a rate?frequency paradigm and then administered CP 55,940 (0, 10, 25 and 50 �g/kg i.p.). CP 55,940 had no effect on MFB self-stimulation behaviour as assessed by the M50, the stimulation frequency at which half-maximal response rates were obtained. This result calls into question previous assertions that Lewis rats are a "cannabis-preferring" strain of rat. Previous studies utilising the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, SR 141716, have shown that the endogenous cannabinoid system may have some involvement in the rewarding effects of cocaine, morphine, sucrose and alcohol. Thus, Chapter 6 also assessed the effects of SR 141716 (0, 1, 3, 10 and 20 mg/kg i.p.) on MFB stimulation in Lewis rats. The role of DA in MFB stimulation reward has already been established, so for comparison purposes the effects of the DA D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (0.06 mg/kg i.p.) was also assessed. Only a very high dose of SR 141716 (20 mg/kg) caused a significant inhibition of the rewarding efficacy of the stimulation with all other doses (1, 3, and 10 mg/kg) being ineffective in modulating the rewarding impact of brain stimulation. This was seen as an increase in M50. By comparison, a relatively low dose (0.06 mg/kg) of SCH 23390 caused a large increase in M50. These results indicate a relatively modest influence of the endogenous cannabinoid system on reward-relevant neurotransmission in the self-stimulation paradigm. Chapter 7 concludes the thesis and discusses the implications of the results obtained. The main findings of the current thesis are: 1) that the suggested "addiction-prone" Lewis strain of rat is less susceptible to cannabinoid-induced anxiety in comparison to Wistar rats; 2) Lewis rats show less cannabinoid-induced c-fos expression in comparison to Wistar rats (including in brain regions implicated in cannabinoid-induced anxiety and reward); 3) cannabinoid-induced c-fos expression exists in a number of brain regions never previously assessed such as the MPO, ICjM and PPTg; 4) behavioural sensitization does not occur with the repeated administration of CP 55,940; 5) cannabinoid pre-exposure or co-administration does not increase the sensitivity of the locomotor-activating effects of cocaine; 6) the endogenous cannabinoid system, at most, only has a minor influence on the neural substrate of brain stimulation reward and; 7) that there are previously unreported strain differences in cannabinoid-induced hypothermia, catalepsy and ataxia. These results add to our understanding of the effects of the behavioural, emotional and neural effects of cannabinoids and the endogenous cannabinoid system.
|
56 |
Trends in Use and Effects of Synthetic Cannabinoids and Cathinones Pre- and Post-Amendment of the Controlled Substance Act in 2012Hayes, John, Bellestri, Robyn L., Goldstone, Lisa January 2014 (has links)
Class of 2014 Abstract / Specific Aims: To compare trends in user demographics, clinical effects, and clinical outcomes associated with the use of synthetic cannabinoids and cathinones before and after signing into law the Synthetic Drug Abuse Prevention Act of 2012 on July 9, 2012. Methods: Reports generated by the National Poison and Drug Information Center’s Toxic Exposure Surveillance System were used to isolate calls regarding patients who reportedly used either synthetic cannabinoids or synthetic cathinones from July 2011 to March 2013. Clinical effects, clinical outcomes, and demographic information of patients associated with these calls from July 9, 2011 to July 8, 2012, were compared to that of patients associated with calls from July 9, 2012 to July 8, 2013. Main Results: Pending Conclusion: Pending
|
57 |
The effect of phytocannabinoid treatment on adipogenesis and lipolysis in 3T3-L1 cellsRamlugon, Sonaal January 2014 (has links)
During the 1800’s cannabis use was described as a treatment for a variety of metabolic disorders but its recreational use in the twentieth century resulted in laws which made the usage of cannabis illegal despite its medicinal properties. Cannabis usage has been reported to be useful in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes but unfortunately conflicting results are often published and its mechanism of action is still unknown. The aim of this project was to investigate the effect of phytocannabinoid treatment on adipogenesis and lipolysis in 3T3-L1 cells, to unravel their mechanism of action and also to test for potential anti-diabetic properties. The studies showed that phytocannabinoid treatment promoted higher glucose uptake and significantly less fat accumulation when compared to Rosiglitazone. Rosiglitazone is an anti-diabetic drug that has recently been withdrawn from the market since its usage has been associated with severe side effects. It was also found that during the 1800’s cannabis use was described as a treatment for a variety of metabolic disorders but its recreational use in the twentieth century resulted in laws which made the usage of cannabis illegal despite its medicinal properties. Cannabis usage has been reported to be useful in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes but unfortunately conflicting results are often published and its mechanism of action is still unknown. The aim of this project was to investigate the effect of phytocannabinoid treatment on adipogenesis and lipolysis in 3T3-L1 cells, to unravel their mechanism of action and also to test for potential anti-diabetic properties. The studies showed that phytocannabinoid treatment promoted higher glucose uptake and significantly less fat accumulation when compared to Rosiglitazone. Rosiglitazone is an anti-diabetic drug that has recently been withdrawn from the market since its usage has been associated with severe side effects. It was also found that phytocannabinoid treatment was able to reverse the insulin-resistant state of 3T3-L1 cells. The study indicates that the mechanism of action occurs at the mitochondrial level where enzymes such as succinate dehydrogenase and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase are modulated thereby affecting oxidative phosphorylation involved in the respiratory chain. In addition the effect observed with phytocannabinoid treatment is time dependent and affects the cells differently at different developmental stages. Therefore it can be concluded that phytocannabinoid treatment not only helps to maintain the balance between adipogenesis and lipolysis in 3T3-L1 cells but its use may also be helpful in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes and/or obesity-related insulin resistance.phytocannabinoid treatment was able to reverse the insulin-resistant state of 3T3-L1 cells. The study indicates that the mechanism of action occurs at the mitochondrial level where enzymes such as succinate dehydrogenase and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase are modulated thereby affecting oxidative phosphorylation involved in the respiratory chain. In addition the effect observed with phytocannabinoid treatment is time dependent and affects the cells differently at different developmental stages. Therefore it can be concluded that phytocannabinoid treatment not only helps to maintain the balance between adipogenesis and lipolysis in 3T3-L1 cells but its use may also be helpful in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes and/or obesity-related insulin resistance.
|
58 |
Komplexní zpracování technického konopí a využití izolovaných frakcí / Complex processing of technical hemp and application of isolated fractionsKohútová, Darina January 2021 (has links)
Hemp is a plant containing many active substances and it is widely used in industry. The most common applications are the food, pharmaceutical, textile and cosmetics industries. This diploma thesis dealt with the characterization of hemp fractions, which are created during hemp processing and their potential applications. The theoretical part was focused on the description of the plant, its chemical composition and the research of the active substances in hemp. Also, its industrial use, the technique of hemp processing and the current applications of individual fractions were summarized. In the experimental part, hemp fractions were analysed in terms of nutrient content. Hemp extracts were prepared using three solvents - hexane, 70% ethanol and distilled water, which were compared based on the extraction yield of polyphenols, flavonoids, antioxidants, chlorophylls and cannabinoids. Antimicrobial effects were analysed in hexane and ethanol extracts. By-products of hemp processing were used in some screening application in biotechnology, cosmetics and nutrition. The results show that the extract with 70% ethanol had the highest content of active substances. From the hemp fractions, hemp trichomes and Fedora flowers had the highest content of active substances. Cannabis by-products have the potential to become valuable substrates for yeast cultivation. Face scrub containing hemp flour as an abrasive component had favourable results and was acceptable to consumers, as was the prepared hemp flour raw bar, which was evaluated to be comparable to commercially available hemp protein raw bars.
|
59 |
An Endocannabinoid System Is Present in the Mouse Olfactory Epithelium but Does Not Modulate OlfactionHutch, C. R., Hillard, C. J., Jia, C., Hegg, C. C. 06 August 2015 (has links)
Endocannabinoids modulate a diverse array of functions including progenitor cell proliferation in the central nervous system, and odorant detection and food intake in the mammalian central olfactory system and larval Xenopus laevis peripheral olfactory system. However, the presence and role of endocannabinoids in the peripheral olfactory epithelium have not been examined in mammals. We found the presence of cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) and cannabinoid type 2 (CB2) receptor protein and mRNA in the olfactory epithelium. Using either immunohistochemistry or calcium imaging we localized CB1 receptors on neurons, glia-like sustentacular cells, microvillous cells and progenitor-like basal cells. To examine the role of endocannabinoids, CB1- and CB2- receptor-deficient (CB1-/-/CB2-/-) mice were used. The endocannabinoid 2-arachidonylglycerol (2-AG) was present at high levels in both C57BL/6 wildtype and CB1-/-/CB2-/- mice. 2-AG synthetic and degradative enzymes are expressed in wildtype mice. A small but significant decrease in basal cell and olfactory sensory neuron numbers was observed in CB1-/-/CB2-/- mice compared to wildtype mice. The decrease in olfactory sensory neurons did not translate to impairment in olfactory-mediated behaviors assessed by the buried food test and habituation/dishabituation test. Collectively, these data indicate the presence of an endocannabinoid system in the mouse olfactory epithelium. However, unlike in tadpoles, endocannabinoids do not modulate olfaction. Further investigation on the role of endocannabinoids in progenitor cell function in the olfactory epithelium is warranted.
|
60 |
Clinical trials for symptoms in patients receiving dialysisCollister, David 06 1900 (has links)
Symptoms in patients receiving dialysis are common and associated with impaired quality of life.
Symptoms are a top research priority because effective therapies are lacking and even with appropriate diagnosis and treatment, residual symptoms often persist. Clinical trials in the setting of kidney disease are challenging to conduct and as a result, nephrology lags behind other specialties regarding the degree to which clinical trials inform the care of patients with kidney disease, including those receiving dialysis. The studies in this thesis inform the design of randomized controlled trials with regards to run-in periods and the treatment of symptoms in patients with kidney disease. Chapter 2 describes a meta-epidemiologic study of the frequency, setting and purposes of run-in periods in parallel randomized controlled trials of self-administered medications for chronic diseases in adults. Chapter 3 is a study within a trial of an international randomized controlled trial that compares spironolactone to placebo for the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in dialysis. It compares the ability
of a 3-week study visit in addition to a 7-week study visit during an active-run-in period to identify and exclude participants with non-adherence. Chapter 4 is a protocol for a randomized placebo controlled crossover trial of low fixed dose pharmacologic therapy for restless legs syndrome in hemodialysis that includes a placebo run-in period for adherence and tolerability. Chapter 5 is a survey of Canadian nephrologists regarding the use of cannabinoids for symptom management in patients with kidney disease and support for their use in clinical trials. / Thesis / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
|
Page generated in 0.046 seconds