Spelling suggestions: "subject:"apital e despesas sociais"" "subject:"acapital e despesas sociais""
1 |
Fundo p?blico e a programa??o e execu??o or?ament?rias no Rio Grande do Norte: uma an?lise a partir do plano plurianual 2004/2015Silva, William Gledson e 12 April 2017 (has links)
Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-07-17T12:59:15Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
WilliamGledsonESilva_TESE.pdf: 1636623 bytes, checksum: e9a78911093f5ec2f7d92c7d5e93d48a (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-07-18T13:10:46Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
WilliamGledsonESilva_TESE.pdf: 1636623 bytes, checksum: e9a78911093f5ec2f7d92c7d5e93d48a (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-18T13:10:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
WilliamGledsonESilva_TESE.pdf: 1636623 bytes, checksum: e9a78911093f5ec2f7d92c7d5e93d48a (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-04-12 / Esta tese teve o objetivo de analisar a contribui??o do fundo p?blico, o qual se expressou comparativamente no or?amento program?tico ou a execu??o desse no Rio Grande do Norte (RN), a partir da dota??o em termos de capital ou despesas sociais, enquadrando institucionalmente o estudo no Plano Plurianual (PPA), Lei de Diretrizes Or?ament?rias (LDO) e Lei Or?ament?ria Anual (LOA), entre os anos 2004 a 2015. Assim, o problema central da pesquisa ressaltou: o fundo p?blico no RN, manifestado na programa??o e a execu??o or?ament?rias, admitiu diferen?as em termos da dota??o na forma de capital e despesa sociais, no ?ltimo trio de ciclos do PPA? A hip?tese da tese sustentou que o or?amento potiguar explicitou diferen?as entre a programa??o e execu??o, mais precisamente na maior dota??o em termos de capital diante das despesas sociais, especialmente no que tange ao consumo social. Utilizou-se na pesquisa, a rigor, a dial?tica como m?todo de an?lise, fazendo uso de uma revis?o de literatura ligada ? ci?ncia pol?tica e teoria econ?mica, al?m das estat?sticas descritivas para medir o comportamento das rubricas observadas. Finalmente, houve uma compreens?o conceitual na qual a pol?tica social se expressou, principalmente, como consumo e despesas sociais, bem como se constatou ser o RN um estado economicamente perif?rico e pass?vel das influ?ncias monet?rias nacionalmente, portanto, com reduzido desenvolvimento, tendo nos investimentos sociais, uma prerrogativa pouco explorada conceitualmente nesta tese. / This thesis aims to analyze the contribution of public fund, which if expressed comparatively programmatic budget or implementation this in Rio Grande do Norte (RN), from the capital allocation or social expenditure, by framing the study in institutionally multiannual plan (PPA), budget guidelines law (LDO) and Annual Budget Law (LOA), between the years 2004 to 2015. Thus, the central problem of research pointed out: the public fund in the RN, manifested in the programming and implementation budget, admitted differences in terms of the appropriation in the form of capital and social spending in the last three cycles of the PPA? The thesis argued that the budget potiguar explained differences between programming and implementation, more precisely in greater capital allocation on social expenditure, especially with regard to the social consumption. It was used in the research, the dialectic as a method of analysis, making use of a review of the literature related to political science and economic theory, in addition to the descriptive statistics to measure the behavior of the items observed. Finally, it was achieved that there was a conceptual understanding in which social policy expressed as consumption and social expenditure, as well as it turned out to be the RN a economically peripheral State and therefore with reduced development, having social investments, a prerogative little explored conceptually this thesis.
|
Page generated in 0.0789 seconds