No description available.

Bibliography: leaves 175-196. The influence of starch in grain-based diets on fat development in cattle and sheep is investigated.

Three studies were conducted to evaluate: 1) rotationally grazed forage for late-summer stockpiling; 2) effects of lactation on self-fed supplement intake; and 3) influence of cow age on hand-fed supplement intake. For the first study, treatments consisted of non grazed, 2X and 3X grazed. Crude protein of forage grazed 3X was greater (P<.10) than non-grazed. Yield of non-grazed forage was greater (P<.10) than forage grazed 2X and 3X. Non-grazed forage displayed the greatest stockpiled yield and grazing influenced quality of stockpiled forage to a small magnitude. Treatments for the second study consisted of non, mid, and late-lactation on two experimental diets. Late-lactation cow BW change was less (P<.10) than non-lactating in both experiments and less (P<.10) than mid-lactating cows in Exp. 1 only. Forage intake for late-lactating cows was less (P<.10) than mid-lactating cows in Exp. 1 and tended to be greater (P=.13) than non-lactating cows in Exp. 2. Self-fed supplement intake was highly variable but not influenced by lactation. Treatments for the third study consisted of five age groups. In yr 1, weight change at d 57 for 11-yr cows was greater (P<.10) than 5-yr cows. In yr 2, weight change at d 28 for 8-yr cows was less (P<.10) than 4, 6, and 10-yr cows and 4-yr cows was greater (P<.10) than 6, 10, and 12-yr cows. At d 56, weight change for 4-yr cows was greater (P<.10) than 6, 8, 10 and 12-yr cows and 12-yr cows was less (P<.10) than 6 and 10-yr cows. Weight change at calving for 4-yr cows was greater (P<.10) than 6, 8, and 12-yr cows. Forage intake of 10-yr cows was greater (P<.10) than 8 and 4-yr cows. Supplement intake of 4-yr cows was greater (P>.10) than 8, 10, and 12-yr cows. Six-yr cows had greater (P<.10) supplement intakes than 12 and 8-yr cows. Three and 4-yr cows displayed the best performance and 4-yr cows consumed the greatest amount of supplement. / Graduation date: 2000

Three experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of quality of supplemental alfalfa quality on beef cattle consuming low-quality meadow grass (MG) roughages. Fifteen steers (250 kg) were assigned randomly to one of three treatments: 1) meadow grass (5.2% CP), no supplement (MNS); 2) meadow grass plus high quality alfalfa hay (AHS) (18.8% CP); and 3) meadow grass plus low quality alfalfa hay (ALS) (15.2% CP). Supplements were fed at 0.45% BW and 0.55 % BW respectively. Total DM intake was greater (P<.01) for alfalfa supplemented steers. Likewise intake of digestible DM, DM digestibility and ruminal ammonia levels were greater for alfalfa supplemented steers (P<.01). In Exp. 2; 96 gestating Hereford x Simmental cows (537 kg; body condition 4.86) were assigned to the same treatments as in Exp. 1. For d-0 to d-42 cows grazed on 19.1 ha of stockpiled MG (4539 kg/ha; 6.8% CP) whereas d-43 to d-84, cows received MG hay (5.2% CP). Results for the 84-d study indicated that supplemented cows gained more BW (P<.01), body condition (P<.01) and had heavier (P<.01) calf birth weights than MNS cows. In the first 42-d period supplemented cows gained 16.2 kg more BW than MNS cows (P<.01). Likewise, supplemented cows increased .24 BC more (P<.01) than MNS cows. The same trend was observed from d-42 to d-84, though ALS cows lost more BC (P<.01) than the AHS cows. In Exp. 3; 90 gestating Angus x Hereford cows (475 kg; body condition 4.59) were assigned to one of three supplemental treatments: 1) 16.1% CP alfalfa; 2) 17.8% CP alfalfa; 3) 20.0% CP alfalfa. The level of supplementation was 0.63%, 0.55%, and 0.50% of BW, respectively. The basal diet was baled MG hay (5.6% CP). Weight gain and BC change for the 84-d study displayed a quadratic response (P<.10). In conclusion, alfalfa hay is an effective way of increasing low-quality roughage DM intake and digestibility. However, alfalfa hay quality did not appear to dramatically effect BW, BC, and (or) calf birth weights, when fed on a isonitrogenous basis. (KEY WORDS: Beef cattle, Supplementation, Meadow Hay, Alfalfa Hay) / Graduation date: 1997

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Two trials were conducted to study the effect of feeding a protected-fat supplement on reproduction. In the first trial eight ovariectomized brangus cows were used to study the effect of feeding a protected-fat supplement on LH release after GnRH injection. The cows were equally divided at random into two groups (control and treatment), placed in individual pens, and fed a ration supplying 4.0 kg of TDN per head daily. Cows in the treatment group received a .68 kg of protected fat daily for the entire experimental period (30 days). On the last day of the experiment an indwelling jugular catheter was inserted into the cows and blood samples were taken every ten minutes for a period of 5 hours. After the sixth sample was taken, 200 (mu)g of GnRH were injected intramuscularly to induce LH release. The samples taken before the GnRH was injected were used to establish basal LH levels. LH levels were analyzed by using the double antibody radioimmunoassay technique. Average weight of the cows at the start of the trial for the control and treatment group were 491 and 457 kg respectively. Cows in the control group lost weight (-8 kg) during the experimental period, whereas those in the treatment group gained 33 kg. The highest LH peak value was 12 ng/ml for the controls and 43 ng/ml for the treated cows. Mean LH values were 4.9 ng/ml for the control group and 43 ng/ml for the treatment group. In the second experiment twenty multiparous four-year-old pregnant brangus cows are used to determine the effect of a protected fat diet on postpartum pituitary response to GnRH. As cows calved they were randomly assigned to either the control or treatment group. The treatment consisted of adding .68 kg of protected fat to the ration. The diet for both groups was designed to supply approximately 4.4 kg of TDN daily per animal. This was about 80% of the NRC requirement. On day 7 postpartum an indwelling catheter was inserted into the jugular vein. Blood samples were taken for 5 hours every ten minutes. After the sixth sample was taken 200 (mu)g of GnRH were injected intramuscularly to induce LH release. The pre-GnRH injection period was used to establish basal LH levels. Luteinizing hormone levels were analyzed using the radioimmunoassay double antibody technique. The latter part of this experiment was designed to assess the effect of a protected fat diet on postpartum estrus activity. Estrus was also checked by daily visual observation. Average weight of the cows at the start of the experiment was 514 and 474 kg for the control and the treatment group respectively. By the end of the trial (75th day) cows in the control group lost 35 kg, and those in the treatment group lost 22 kg. Average daily gain of calves whose mothers were on treatment or control did not differ. Mean LH levels were 18 and 13 ng/ml for the treatment and control cows respectively. This difference was not statistically significant due to a large mean standard error. Fifty percent of the cows receiving the protected fat supplement had shown standing estrus by day 45 postpartum vs 20% for the control group. By day 15 pospartum 60% of the cows in the treatment group had shown signs of postpartum estrus activity vs only 10% for the control group. By day 45 postpartum all the cows receiving the protected fat supplement had shown signs of estrus activity vs only 50% for the control.

An experiment was conducted with Brangus cows to evaluate the effect of loss of body weight and condition on pituitary responsiveness to gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation during late lactation. The treatment groups were lactating intact (LI), lactating ovariectomized (LO), nonlactating intact (NLI), and nonlactating ovariectomized (NLO). The study was carried out in two separate blocks, each one consisting of 3 periods. During period 1 the cows were fed a ration that supplied 90% and 88% of the NRC recommendations for TDN in lactating and nonlactating cows, respectively. This period lasted 170 in block 1 and 130 days in block 2. During period 2 the TDN was reduced to 55% or 52% for lactating and nonlactating cows, respectively. Period 2 lasted 100 days for cows in block 1 and 63 days for cows in block 2. At the beginning of period 3 TDN was further reduced to 25% or 27% for the lactating and nonlactating cows, respectively. Cows in block 1 were challenged with GnRH 40 days after the beginning of the 1st energy reduction, 30 days later and 7 days after the 2nd energy reduction. The cows in block 2 were challenged with GnRH 30 days after the 1st energy reduction, 30 days later and 25 days after the 2nd energy reduction. At the end of the study body composition parameters and organ gland weights were determined. No significant differences in the weights of the cows among the treatment groups were found. All cows were, however, losing weight through the course of this study. The nonlactating cows maintained higher body condition (P < .05) than lactating cows from 31 days after ovariectomies were performed until the end of the study. The pituitary glands were significantly heavier in the lactating ovariectomized (2.3 g vs. 1.7 g, P < .05) than the nonlactating intact cows. The weight of the adrenals per unit of body weight of LO cows was significantly higher (.057 g/kg vs. .040 g, P < .05) than among NLO cows. The percent of carcass lipid was significantly higher (P < .05) in nonlactating as compared to lactating cows. Percent moisture and protein were higher (P < .05) in lactating cows. Amount of LH released after GnRH stimulation tended to be higher in lactating than nonlactating cows. The magnitude of the LH peak did not differ significantly among the treatment groups at each of the dates GnRN was injected. Ovariectomized cows (LO and NLO) responded more rapidly (P < .05) to GnRH stimulation than intact cows (LI and NLI). Time on reduced TDN did not affect cow's response pattern after GnRH injection.