Spelling suggestions: "subject:"chloridebased explosive"" "subject:"hydratebased explosive""
1 |
Electroanalytical Paper-Based Sensors for In-Field Detection of Chlorate-Based Explosives and Quantification of OxyanionsGuimarães Vega, Carolina 05 1900 (has links)
Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Improvised explosive devices (IEDs) are a global threat due to their destructive potential,
the easy access to raw materials, and online instructions to manufacture them. These circumstances have led to an increase in the number of IEDs using potassium chlorate as an oxidizer. The standard methods to detect chlorate are mainly designed for laboratory-only testing. Thus, field instrumentation capable of detecting oxidizers from explosives fuel-oxidizers is critical for crime scene investigation and counterterrorism efforts (described in Chapter 1). We developed a paper-based sensor for the in-field detection of chlorate (described in Chapter 2). The sensor is low-cost, disposable, portable, and inexpensive to fabricate, and its flexibility features allow for surface sampling without sample destruction. The sensor has an electrodeposited molybdate sensing layer, as chlorate was reported to have a catalytic effect on the molybdate reduction. The chlorate detection relies on monitoring the change in redox activity of the molybdate sensing layer using different electroanalytical techniques. We effectively demonstrated the analytical performance of the sensor (Chapter 3), obtaining a limit of detection of 1.2 mM and a limit of quantification of 4.10 mM. We evaluated the selectivity of the sensor by testing other oxidizers, such as perchlorate and nitrate, which did not present any electrochemical activity with the molybdate sensing layer.
Additionally, we performed an interferent study with sugar, commonly used as fuel in IEDs,
and other common white household powders such as baking soda, flour, and corn starch and neither a false positive nor a false negative result was observed (Chapter 3). As bromate has been reported to have a stronger catalytic effect than chlorate on the redox activity of molybdate, the quantification of bromate was also explored, and a bromate sensor was developed using the findings of the chlorate sensor (Chapter 4). The reaction mechanism involved in the molybdate reduction was explored and discussed in Chapter 5. The capability of the sensor in detecting chlorate from combusted samples and post-blast samples was successfully demonstrated in Chapter 6, as well as the design of encased prototypes to allow for an in-field presumptive test, storage, and transport for in-laboratory confirmatory tests and compared the performance of the sensor to the available commercial tests.
|
2 |
ELECTROANALYTICAL PAPER-BASED SENSORS FOR IN-FIELD DETECTION OF CHLORATE-BASED EXPLOSIVES AND QUANTIFICATION OF OXYANIONSCarolina Guimaraes Vega (15339037) 18 May 2023 (has links)
<p> </p>
<p><em>Improvised explosive devices (IEDs) are a global threat due to their destructive potential, the easy access to raw materials, and online instructions to manufacture them. These circumstances have led to an increase in the number of IEDs using potassium chlorate as an oxidizer. The standard methods to detect chlorate are mainly designed for laboratory-only testing. Thus, field instrumentation capable of detecting oxidizers from explosives fuel-oxidizers is critical for crime scene investigation and counterterrorism efforts (described in Chapter 1). We developed a paper-based sensor for the in-field detection of chlorate (described in Chapter 2). The sensor is low-cost, disposable, portable, and inexpensive to fabricate, and its flexibility features allow for surface sampling without sample destruction. The sensor has an electrodeposited molybdate sensing layer, as chlorate was reported to have a catalytic effect on the molybdate reduction. The chlorate detection relies on monitoring the change in redox activity of the molybdate sensing layer using different electroanalytical techniques. We effectively demonstrated the analytical performance of the sensor (Chapter 3), obtaining a limit of detection of 1.2 mM and a limit of quantification of 4.10 mM. We evaluated the selectivity of the sensor by testing other oxidizers, such as perchlorate and nitrate, which did not present any electrochemical activity with the molybdate sensing layer.</em></p>
<p><em>Additionally, we performed an interferent study with sugar, commonly used as fuel in IEDs, and other common white household powders such as baking soda, flour, and corn starch and neither a false positive nor a false negative result was observed (Chapter 3). As bromate has been reported to have a stronger catalytic effect than chlorate on the redox activity of molybdate, the quantification of bromate was also explored, and a bromate sensor was developed using the findings of the chlorate sensor (Chapter 4). The reaction mechanism involved in the molybdate</em></p>
<p><em>reduction was explored and discussed in Chapter 5. The capability of the sensor in detecting chlorate from combusted samples and post-blast samples was successfully demonstrated in Chapter 6, as well as the design of encased prototypes to allow for an in-field presumptive test, storage, and transport for in-laboratory confirmatory tests and compared the performance of the sensor to the available commercial tests.</em></p>
|
Page generated in 0.0479 seconds