Spelling suggestions: "subject:"clinical coding"" "subject:"cilinical coding""
1 |
Engineering knowledge exchange for translational research informaticsMason-Blakley, F. 21 December 2010 (has links)
Engineering effective knowledge exchange pathways between scientists and clinicians
will accelerate the development and improvement of clinical treatments extracted
from lab bench experiments. Many standards development organizations in
the field of translational research informatics have attempted to prescribe mechanisms
which would provide these knowledge exchange pathways; however, concrete implementations
of these standards and the software structures which support them are
still lacking. We have explored key technologies and techniques which may facilitate
knowledge exchange through clinical coding, a domain specific version of the more
general technique of semantic annotation. During the development process we identified and provided potential solutions to four primary problem areas in engineering
software enabled knowledge exchange pathways for translational research: architecture,
terminology, validation and interface design. We provide both a technical and
practical evaluation of a multicomponent architecture which was conceived as a mechanism
for producing knowledge exchange pathways between researchers in the field
of cancer informatics; however, the principles and process which we apply to cancer
informatics could easily be applied to other areas of clinical informatics.
|
2 |
Semantic Analysis Mapping Framework for Clinical Coding Schemes: A Design Science Research ApproachClunis, Julaine 22 December 2021 (has links)
No description available.
|
3 |
Cross-cultural comparison of the perceptions and experiences of dementia care mapping "mappers" in the United States and the United KingdomDouglass, C., Keddie, A., Brooker, Dawn J.R., Surr, Claire A. 15 March 2010 (has links)
No / Survey results from 161 respondents trained in dementia care mapping (DCM) in the United States and United Kingdom (82 and 79 respondents, respectively) addressed the following: (a) To what extent are mappers using DCM? (b) How satisfied are mappers with DCM? (c) What affect does DCM have on mappers' attitudes toward their dementia practice? and (d) What challenges are encountered by mappers in the use of DCM? METHOD: Analyses using odds ratios were used to make international and training-level (basic vs. advanced) comparisons. RESULTS: Differences across countries were found in use of DCM and lack of satisfaction using DCM codes. Similarities were found with positive affects of DCM on attitudes and lack of time for DCM. DISCUSSION: Differences in mappers' experiences and perceptions exist across the two countries, warranting increased attention to the cultural contexts within which mappers are situated and how these affect the implementation of DCM within a country.
|
Page generated in 0.0843 seconds