In this study, two primary hypotheses drawn from Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory (Epstein, 1994, 1998, 2003) and the treatment preference literature (Arnkoff, Glass, & Shapiro, 2002) were tested in the broader contexts of similarity/matching research and eclecticism in psychotherapy. Specifically, it was hypothesized that client-therapist similarity/dissimilarity in terms of (a) their Rational and Experiential Thinking styles (Pacini & Epstein, 1999), and (b) their preferences for a Cognitive ("Thinking") versus an Experiential ("Feeling") theoretical orientation (Hutchins, 1984), would affect the process and outcome of early therapy. Forty-seven client-therapist dyads participated in the study. In the seven hierarchical linear regressions conducted, no statistically significant effects were found on any of the dependent variables (working alliance, empathic understanding, session depth, session smoothness, satisfaction with treatment, perceived change, and objective change). Study limitations included its modest statistical power to detect small and moderate effect sizes.Three exploratory questions were also investigated in a sample of 89 clients and 79 therapists and were found to be statistically significant. Specifically, client rational and experiential thinking styles made substantial contributions in the expected direction in predicting client preference for a cognitive versus an experiential treatment. Similarly, therapist experiential thinking style was predictive of therapist treatment preference. These findings suggest that client and therapist personality (thinking styles) are more significant predictors of treatment preference than variables such as gender and clinical experience (as a therapist or a client). Last, rational thinking style was predictive of client intrapersonal adjustment, and experiential thinking style was predictive of client social adjustment. / Department of Counseling Psychology and Guidance Services

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Nevada, Reno, 2006. / "August, 2006." Includes bibliographical references (leaves 65-83). Library also has microfilm. Ann Arbor, Mich. : ProQuest Information and Learning Company, [2006]. 1 microfilm reel ; 35 mm. Online version available on the World Wide Web.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--York University, 2004. Graduate Programme in Psychology. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references. Also available on the Internet. MODE OF ACCESS via web browser by entering the following URL: http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/yorku/fullcit?pNQ99237

M.A. (Clinical Psychology) / The relatively rapid development of cognitive-behavioural approaches to various psychological conditions, has prompted clinicians and researchers to investigate the effects of this therapeutic modality on Bulimia Nervosa sufferers more closely. Research has evidenced the complexity and uniqueness of this disorder and much speculation still remains with regard to the etiology, description and treatment of Bulimia. Of the various treatments proposed, the cognitive~behavioural approaches have appeared to be most effective. Latest developments in this modality emphasize cognitive factors like content-specific cognitions and Early maladaptive schemas. These factors are important for psychotherapeutic purposes. The hypothesis formulated for this study, stated broadly that cognitive-behavioural approaches would result in equal treatment efficacy, whether process(schema) or content based interventions. This was investigated in the context of a pilot clinical trial with four selected subjects. Apart from measures for depression and cognitive processes associated with eating and self image in Bulimia, a depth-of processing task and a schema questionnaire were used in investigating the hypothesis. These measures, in addition to the CB interventions were applied to a small group of carefully selected Bulimics ,diagnosed acccording to the DSM III-R. The findings supported the basic hypothesis of the study, and demonstrated that cognitive-behavioural approaches of either content or process types are equally efficacious in the treatment of Bulimia Nervosa.