No abstract / Dissertation LLM--University of Pretoria, 2014 / hb2014 / Mercantile Law / unrestricted

The objective of this study is to do critical analysis if the new Companies Act, with specific reference capital maintenance rules. Furthermore, this study will compare the current Companies Act with the new Companies Act, with a specific focus on sections 44, 45 and 48 of the new Companies Act and their comparison to sections 38, 85 and 226 of the current Companies Act. The next objective is to establish what impact the new piece of legislation will have on South African companies and whether the deficiencies in the current Companies Act have been addressed by the new Companies Act. The final objective is to establish whether this new piece of legislation gives adequate protection for the shareholders of a company. This study will focus on certain aspects of capital maintenance and excludes a comprehensive study of the capital maintenance rules, as the focus will be on certain sections in the current Companies Act and also the new Companies Act. This study will focus on the comparison between the new and current Companies Act. Furthermore, the focus will also be on the protection of the creditors of a company when analysing the different sections of the current companies act and the new companies act. / Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2011. / Mercantile Law / unrestricted

No abstract available. / Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2013. / Mercantile Law / unrestricted

No abstract available. / Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2013. / Mercantile Law / unrestricted

No abstract available / Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2012. / Mercantile Law / unrestricted

Magister Legum - LLM / An agent acting in excess of his authority creates several legal problems, particularly in company law. In South African law, like in many other legal systems around the world, the interplay between the doctrines of ultra vires and constructive notice has, historically, played a profound role in governing the relationship between a company, its representatives, and outsiders. For decades, the contractual capacity and consequent liability of companies have been guided by thorny and intricate legal principles. This issue has become especially intriguing in light of the changes to the company law regime introduced by the new legislation. The relevant sections of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (the 2008 Act) that allow for the restriction of a company's powers, require close scrutiny and thoughtful consideration. To that end, this thesis shall examine some of the legal consequences arising from the conclusion by a company's agent of an "unauthorised contract".

Magister Legum - LLM

In conducting this study I want to give more clarity about the New Companies Act and how it compares to the Current Companies Act. According to the study and the results, the New Companies Act gives more protection to, specifically the shareholders and the creditors. The New Companies Act is much wider in some instances and gives more clarity. On the other hand the are still a lot of aspects that needs to be addressed. In this study I took a look at Sections 38, 226 and 85 of the Current Companies Act and then I compared it to Sections 44, 45, and 48 of the New Companies Act. With all the changes that have been brought to the New Companies Act it now, puts South African Law in line with the International standards of Company Law. Copyright / Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2010. / Mercantile Law / unrestricted

This dissertation critically analyses the business rescue regime, with a specific focus on those attributes of the regime which detrimentally affect creditors. The main aspects which will be critically analysed include, the moratorium, the effect of business rescue on suretyships and the costs of business rescue. Examples will be used to illustrate the ways in which the business rescue regime is disproportionately slanted in favour of debtor companies as opposed to their creditors. Proposals as to how the regime can be developed to balance the competing interests of debtor companies and their creditors will also be made. / Mini Dissertation (LLM (Corporate Law))--University of Pretoria, 2020. / Mercantile Law / LLM (Corporate Law) / Unrestricted

This is a research analysis on whether the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (the Act) balances the competing rights and interests of stakeholders affected by an affected transaction and fundamental transaction, and the remedial procedures triggered by these transactions. The new regime relating to fundamental transactions and affected transactions in the Act has, in practice, presented a number of legal questions, the answers to which are not readily apparent from the Act itself.1 These innovative provisions have also brought with them some fear and anxiety for a number of small and medium sized private companies as the administrative duties associated with the regulation of these transactions are fairly onerous and costly.2 The Companies Act 71 of 2008 aims:  “to provide for the incorporation, registration, organisation and management of companies, the capitalisation of profit companies, and the registration of offices of foreign companies carrying on business within the Republic;  to define the relationships between companies and their respective shareholders or members and directors;  to provide for equitable and efficient amalgamations, mergers and takeovers of companies;  to provide for efficient rescue of financially distressed companies; to provide appropriate legal redress for investors and third parties with respect to companies;  to establish a Companies and Intellectual Property Commission and a Takeover Regulation Panel to administer the requirements of the Act with respect to companies, to establish a Companies Tribunal to facilitate alternative dispute resolution and to review decisions of the Commission;  to establish a Financial Reporting Standards Council to advise on requirements for financial record-keeping and reporting by companies;  to repeal the Companies Act, 1973 (Act No. 61 of 1973), and make amendments to the Close Corporations Act, 1984 (Act No. 69 of 1984), as necessary to provide for a consistent and harmonious regime of business incorporation and regulation; and  to provide for matters connected therewith.” 3 The Act aims for a more flexible approach that has a balance between accountability and transparency, with less regulatory burden. / Mini Dissertation (LLM (Corporate Law))--University of Pretoria, 2020. / Mercantile Law / LLM (Corporate Law) / Unrestricted