Submitted by Estagiário SPT BMHS (spt@fgv.br) on 2013-07-30T12:35:47Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertation Felipe Buchbinder.pdf: 1585162 bytes, checksum: b566d391b5cfffdea11553af4c3fcd3e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Estagiário SPT BMHS (spt@fgv.br) on 2013-07-30T12:36:04Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertation Felipe Buchbinder.pdf: 1585162 bytes, checksum: b566d391b5cfffdea11553af4c3fcd3e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Estagiário SPT BMHS (spt@fgv.br) on 2013-07-30T12:36:22Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertation Felipe Buchbinder.pdf: 1585162 bytes, checksum: b566d391b5cfffdea11553af4c3fcd3e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2013-07-30T12:36:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertation Felipe Buchbinder.pdf: 1585162 bytes, checksum: b566d391b5cfffdea11553af4c3fcd3e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-06-08 / Competitive Strategy literature predicts three different mechanisms of performance generation, thus distinguishing between firms that have competitive advantage, firms that have competitive disadvantage or firms that have neither. Nonetheless, previous works in the field have fitted a single normal distribution to model firm performance. Here, we develop a new approach that distinguishes among performance generating mechanisms and allows the identification of firms with competitive advantage or disadvantage. Theorizing on the positive feedback loops by which firms with competitive advantage have facilitated access to acquire new resources, we proposed a distribution we believe data on firm performance should follow. We illustrate our model by assessing its fit to data on firm performance, addressing its theoretical implications and comparing it to previous works.