Most individuals who die by suicide have contact with a physician in the year before their death. There are no randomized trials that have evaluated suicide intervention training for medical students or physicians. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a gatekeeper training program on suicide intervention behavior using Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) in medical students. A randomized controlled trial design was used. Participants were 112 undergraduate medical students at the University of Manitoba. The 2-day Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) program was completed by half of the participants, according to a stratified block randomization design. Scores on OSCEs and scores on the Suicide Intervention Response Inventory (SIRI-2) were used as objective measures of intervention behaviors. There was a a significant Group-by-Time interaction on OSCE data, demonstrating that medical students who received ASIST performed significantly better than medical students who received training as usual (p<.001). The two groups did not differ significantly from each other on the SIRI-2 (p=.78). ASIST training improved the ability of medical students to detect and intervene with a standardized suicidal patient as assessed by OSCEs, compared to medical school training as usual. This study provides support for ASIST training for medical students to develop skills in recognition and management of suicidal patients. / October 2015

Despite the rapid development of palliative care teams, evidence for their effectiveness in oncology care is lacking. This thesis reviews and contributes towards this evidence, focusing on the randomized controlled trial as a research method. We conducted a systematic review of 22 trials reviewed that measured effectiveness of specialized palliative care. Family satisfaction with care improved in seven of 10 studies, but only four of 13 trials assessing quality of life and one of 14 assessing symptoms showed a benefit of the intervention. Conclusions were limited by methodologic problems in all of the trials. We conducted a phase II study of the efficacy of a palliative care team for symptom control and satisfaction of 150 patients with advanced cancer. Symptom severity (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Distress Score) improved at one week and one month, as did patient satisfaction (all p<0.0001). We investigated factors associated with symptom severity and response for patients enrolled in the phase II study. Symptoms at baseline were worse for women and those with worse performance status (both p<0.005); female gender and worse baseline symptom severity independently predicted symptom improvement (both p<0.05). We planned and initiated an RCT of the effectiveness of an early palliative care intervention for improvement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) and satisfaction with care. Using baseline data from this RCT, we examined factors associated with HRQL in patients with advanced cancer. The strongest determinants of overall HRQL (combined FACT-G total score and FACIT-Sp Meaning and Peace subscore) were increased age (p<0.001), good performance status (p<0.001) and survival time >6 months (p=0.001). Compared to patients receiving cancer treatment, those awaiting new treatment had worse emotional well-being (p<0.001) while those on surveillance or whose treatment had been stopped had worse existential well-being (p=0.03). Male gender predicted better emotional and physical well-being and lower income predicted worse social well-being. Lastly, we developed recommendations for those planning an RCT in a palliative care population, incorporating information from the studies presented. Although such RCTs are challenging to conduct, they are feasible and necessary to improve the evidence base for the treatment of patients with advanced cancer.

Despite the rapid development of palliative care teams, evidence for their effectiveness in oncology care is lacking. This thesis reviews and contributes towards this evidence, focusing on the randomized controlled trial as a research method. We conducted a systematic review of 22 trials reviewed that measured effectiveness of specialized palliative care. Family satisfaction with care improved in seven of 10 studies, but only four of 13 trials assessing quality of life and one of 14 assessing symptoms showed a benefit of the intervention. Conclusions were limited by methodologic problems in all of the trials. We conducted a phase II study of the efficacy of a palliative care team for symptom control and satisfaction of 150 patients with advanced cancer. Symptom severity (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Distress Score) improved at one week and one month, as did patient satisfaction (all p<0.0001). We investigated factors associated with symptom severity and response for patients enrolled in the phase II study. Symptoms at baseline were worse for women and those with worse performance status (both p<0.005); female gender and worse baseline symptom severity independently predicted symptom improvement (both p<0.05). We planned and initiated an RCT of the effectiveness of an early palliative care intervention for improvement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) and satisfaction with care. Using baseline data from this RCT, we examined factors associated with HRQL in patients with advanced cancer. The strongest determinants of overall HRQL (combined FACT-G total score and FACIT-Sp Meaning and Peace subscore) were increased age (p<0.001), good performance status (p<0.001) and survival time >6 months (p=0.001). Compared to patients receiving cancer treatment, those awaiting new treatment had worse emotional well-being (p<0.001) while those on surveillance or whose treatment had been stopped had worse existential well-being (p=0.03). Male gender predicted better emotional and physical well-being and lower income predicted worse social well-being. Lastly, we developed recommendations for those planning an RCT in a palliative care population, incorporating information from the studies presented. Although such RCTs are challenging to conduct, they are feasible and necessary to improve the evidence base for the treatment of patients with advanced cancer.

Maternal and child undernutrition are a significant problem in the developing world, with serious consequences for human health and socio-economic development. In Cambodia, 55% of children, 43% of women of reproductive age, and 50% of pregnant women are anemic. Current prevention and control practices rely on supplementation with iron pills or large-scale food fortification, neither of which are affordable or feasible in rural Cambodia. In the study areas, 97% of women did not meet their daily iron requirements. The current research focuses on the design and evaluation of an innovative iron supplementation technique. A culturally acceptable, inexpensive and lightweight iron ingot was designed to resemble a fish species considered lucky in Khmer culture. The ingot, referred to as ‘try sabay’ or ‘happy fish’, was designed to supply iron at a slow, steady rate. Iron leaching was observed in water and soup samples prepared with the iron fish when used concurrently with an acidifier. More than 75% of daily iron requirements can be met with regular use. Its use in the common pot of soup or boiled water provides supplementation to the entire family. The effectiveness of the iron fish was investigated in a randomized community trial involving 310 women in rural Cambodia. Blood samples were taken at baseline and every three months thereafter, over a 12-month trial period. Significant increases in hemoglobin concentrations were observed in women allocated an iron fish when compared to controls throughout the study, with an endline difference of 11.6 g/L. Significant improvements in serum ferritin concentration were observed at 9 months (6.9 ng/mL) and endline (30.8 ng/mL) in women who used an iron fish regularly when compared to the control group. Overall, use of the iron fish led to a two-fold reduction in the prevalence of anemia. The supplement was used daily by 94% of the households at the end of the trial. The study highlights the acceptability and effectiveness of a fish-shaped iron ingot as a means of improving dietary iron content. It offers a promising, simple solution to iron deficiency anemia if the project can be scaled-up for use throughout the country. / Canadian Institutes of Health Research; International Development Research Centre; University of Guelph

Breastfeeding is recommended as the optimal source of nutrition for newborns for the first 6 months of life and beyond with the addition of complementary foods. While breastfeeding initiation rates have been increasing, duration rates remain a concern as many women prematurely discontinue due to difficulties encountered rather than maternal choice. In addition, there is a sizable gap between rates of exclusive breastfeeding and current recommendations. Targeting modifiable variables that may be amenable to intervention is one strategy to improve breastfeeding outcomes. One such modifiable variable is breastfeeding self-efficacy. Although research has clearly shown that breastfeeding self-efficacy is predictive of breastfeeding duration and exclusivity, it is unknown whether it can be enhanced to improve breastfeeding outcomes. The purpose of this pilot randomized controlled trial was to examine the feasibility and compliance of a newly developed trial protocol and the acceptability of an intervention to increase breastfeeding self-efficacy in the immediate postpartum period. Secondary outcomes included determining whether there were any trends between groups related to breastfeeding self-efficacy, duration, and exclusivity. Participants included 150 primiparous mothers who were breastfeeding their healthy, full-term infants. Eligible and consenting mothers were randomized to either a control group (standard postpartum care) or an intervention group (standard postpartum care plus the self-efficacy intervention). Participants allocated to the intervention group received three individualized, self-efficacy enhancing sessions with the researcher; two sessions were conducted in hospital, and one was administered via telephone 1 week following hospital discharge. A research assistant blinded to group allocation collected outcome data at 4 and 8 weeks postpartum. The results suggested that the administration of the intervention was feasible and that there was a high degree of protocol compliance; the majority of participants reported that the intervention was beneficial. Secondary outcomes identified that there was a trend among participants in the intervention group to have improved breastfeeding outcomes, including higher rates of breastfeeding self-efficacy, duration, and exclusivity at 4 and 8 weeks postpartum. Preliminary evidence also suggested that the self-efficacy intervention may have assisted to decrease perceptions of insufficient milk supply among the intervention group participants. Overall, the findings from this pilot trial indicated that a larger trial is warranted.

Background Some degree of cognitive decline is a normal, non-clinical part of aging. Physical exercise has been suggested as one strategy which may improve cognition in nondemented older adults. The findings of randomised, controlled trials conducted since the 1980s have been promising, but not unequivocal, and much remains to be understood about the relationship between exercise and cognition in older adults. There have also been suggestions that combining exercise and cognitive training may be beneficial. There has, however, been only one reported study comparing the benefits of exercise training, and combined exercise and cognitive training (Fabre, Chamari, Mucci, Masse-Biron, & Prefaut, 2002). While combined training was reported to be even more effective than exercise training alone for improving cognition in older adults, the study had some substantial limitations. Aims The overall aims of this thesis were to further explore the effect of exercise training on cognition in older adults, and to compare exercise training alone with combined exercise and cognitive training. Following a narrative review of the relevant literature, this thesis is presented in two parts. In Part One a randomized, controlled trial comparing the impact of exercise training, and combined exercise and cognitive training, on the cognitive functioning, physical functioning, functional performance, and psychological well-being of communitydwelling older adults is presented. For Part One, there were three specific aims: (1) To assess the efficacy of a 16 week exercise program (relative to control), on measures of cognitive functioning, physical functioning, functional performance, and psychological well-being; (2) To compare the efficacy of the 16 week exercise program with that of a 16 week combined exercise and cognitive training program; and (3) To identify the physical, psychological and training factors associated with changes in cognitive and physical functioning from baseline to post-test. In Part Two a qualitative evaluation of older adults’ experiences and perceptions of exercise training, and combined exercise and cognitive training, is presented. Methods Thirty-nine community dwelling, older adults (aged between 60 and 80 years) were randomly allocated to one of three groups: Exercise, Combination or Control. Participants in the Exercise group attended three aerobic and strength training sessions per week for 16 weeks. Participants in the Combination group attended two aerobic and strength training sessions, and one cognitive training session, per week for 16 weeks. Participants in the Control group were contacted every four weeks. Assessments were conducted at baseline, post-test (16 weeks) and six-month follow-up (40 weeks). Measures of physical function, cognitive function, functional performance, and psychological wellbeing were collected, along with anthropometric and physiological measures. For the qualitative evaluation, participants from the Exercise and Combination groups provided written feedback to questions about their experiences of the two training programs and their perceptions of the outcomes. These qualitative data were collected after post-test. Results Significant within-group improvements in physical and cognitive function, from baseline to post-test, were seen in Exercise and Combination participants. Combination participants also showed significant within-group reductions in symptoms of anxiety and depression. There were, however, only a few significant between-group differences among Exercise and Control participants, and among Exercise and Combination participants. There were no significant within-group improvements in functional performance, from baseline to post-test, among Exercise or Combination participants. Six-month follow-up data were difficult to interpret, due to the paucity of between-group differences at post-test and the small sample size. There were several significant associations between physical, psychological and training factors, and changes in cognitive and physical functioning. The most pertinent finding was that baseline functioning was consistently associated with change, such that participants with low baseline scores were most likely to improve from baseline to posttest. In the qualitative evaluation participants reported positive experiences of the training programs and reported improvements in physical, cognitive, functional and psychological wellbeing. Participants also highlighted components of the programs which require improvement and made recommendations for future programs. Conclusions The results of this thesis provide some cautious support for the notion that exercise, and combined exercise and cognitive training, may result in small improvements in cognition, physical functioning, and psychological well-being in older adults. Some of the findings must be interpreted with caution, however, given the small sample size. More research is required into the functional (or ‘real world’) impact of this type of training, the long-term effects of training, and the factors associated with changes in cognitive and physical function. Based on these findings, recommendations for the development and implementation of future research were made. As the population ages and the public health burden attributable to aging increases, research into the development and efficacy of programs to enhance well-being and independence in older adults is of great importance.

Rationale Within Australia, cardiac rehabilitation attendance is poor, with typically thirty percent of eligible patients attending programs. The majority of cardiac patients are not receiving the support or detailed information required to increase physical activity participation after hospitalisation. Further, many cardiac patients are not exercising independently, regardless of their attendance at cardiac rehabilitation. As physical activity is important in the prevention and treatment of heart disease, there could be substantial benefits to the individual and cost savings for the health system if cardiac patients were more active. Physical activity interventions based on social cognitive theory have demonstrated success in improving physical activity among people with chronic diseases. However, there is little research conducted with cardiac patients, in particular, with those who do not attend cardiac rehabilitation. This research addresses this gap in public health practice by providing an intervention to cardiac patients, irrespective of their attendance at cardiac rehabilitation, thereby addressing a population that is often overlooked and hard to reach. Research aims ?? To determine the uptake rate of cardiac rehabilitation in the north Illawarra and Shoalhaven areas of New South Wales and identify the characteristics of cardiac rehabilitation attendees and non attendees. ?? To evaluate the efficacy of a pedometer based physical activity intervention in cardiac patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation. Methodology This thesis consisted of three related studies: a cross sectional analysis of the characteristics of cardiac rehabilitation referrals (n = 944) over a 10 month period; and two randomised controlled trials conducted simultaneously. The Cardiac Rehabilitation Trial participants (n = 110) were patients who had attended cardiac rehabilitation; Community Trial participants (n = 215) were those who did not attend cardiac rehabilitation. The six week intervention evaluated in the trials included self monitoring of daily physical activity using a pedometer and step calendar, and two behavioural counselling and goal setting sessions delivered via telephone. Additional support for intervention group participants was provided through two brief telephone calls made after the six week intervention period. Self reported physical activity levels were collected at baseline, six weeks and six months. The questionnaire also collected information about psychosocial factors affecting physical activity participation. The exercise capacity of the participants in the Cardiac Rehabilitation Trial was objectively measured at baseline, six weeks and six months using a gas exchange analysis system. Results The cardiac rehabilitation uptake rate was 28.8 per cent of referred patients. Cardiac rehabilitation attendees were significantly younger and more likely to have had a coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABGS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure than non attendees. Study groups in both trials were not significantly different at baseline. In the Cardiac Rehabilitation Trial, improvements in total weekly physical activity sessions (p=0.002), walking time (p=0.013) and walking sessions (p<0.001) in the intervention group were significantly greater than the change in the control group at the end of the six week intervention. At six months, improvements in the intervention group remained significantly greater than the control group in total physical activity time (p=0.044), total physical activity sessions (p=0.016) and walking sessions (p=0.035) after adjusting for baseline differences. These self reported behavioural changes were corroborated by improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness at six months in the intervention group (p=0.010). Improvements in the intervention group in behavioural (p=0.039) and cognitive (p=0.024) self management strategy use were significantly greater than the controls at six weeks after adjusting for baseline differences. The improvement in cognitive strategy use (p=0.001) remained significantly greater in the intervention group compared to controls at six months after adjusting for baseline differences. Self efficacy, outcome expectancies and psychological distress were not significantly different between groups at six weeks or six months after adjusting for baseline differences. In the Community Trial, improvements in total weekly physical activity time (p=0.027), total physical activity sessions (p=0.003), walking time (p=0.013) and walking sessions (p=0.002) in the intervention group were significantly greater than the control group at six weeks after adjusting for baseline differences. At six months, improvements in total physical activity time (p=0.015), total physical activity sessions (p=0.019), walking time (p=0.002) and walking sessions (p=0.026) in the intervention group remained significantly greater than the control group after adjusting for baseline differences. Improvements in outcome expectancies (p=0.038) and cognitive self management strategy use (p=0.028) in the intervention group were significantly greater than the change in the control group at six weeks, after adjusting for baseline differences. However, these differences did not remain significant at six months. Conclusion This research showed that participation in a six week pedometer based intervention significantly increased the physical activity level and psychosocial status of people with heart disease. These findings suggest the pedometer based intervention could be offered as an effective and accessible option for those who do not attend cardiac rehabilitation to increase their physical activity levels. This intervention could also be promoted as an important adjunct to existing cardiac rehabilitation programs to promote adherence to physical activity after cardiac rehabilitation attendance. These studies provide community based evidence of an effective physical activity intervention for those eligible for cardiac rehabilitation, including those who do not attend. This provides a public health approach to cardiac rehabilitation programs and has the potential to improve health outcomes in this population.

Philosophy(PhD) / This thesis presents a randomised controlled trial of the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention. The Lidcombe Program was developed for the treatment of stuttering in preschool-age children. The effectiveness of the Lidcombe Program was compared to a control group in a parallel group randomised controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment. A number of supplementary studies were conducted in support of the trial; two literature reviews, two retrospective file audits and a statistical simulation study. A review of randomised studies of treatments for stuttering showed that there have been 27 such studies published in English language journals. Of these only one was devoted to a treatment for early stuttering and that was the Lidcombe Program. The randomised study showed that 3 months of this treatment was associated with a lower level of stuttering compared to a control group who received no treatment. However, with a sample size of 23, this study lacked power and the children did not receive a full course of treatment. Despite these limitations, this study provided evidence that a medium to large effect size could be anticipated in an adequately powered and properly conducted randomised controlled trial. The second review was of sample size and power in stuttering research studies that had been published in two speech pathology journals; the Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research (Vol 39, No. 1 to Vol 40, No, 4) and the Journal of Fluency Disorders (Vol 21, No. 1 to Vol 22, No, 3). Results suggested that the majority (73%) of the 26 studies reviewed were insufficiently powered to detect even large effects. However it was acknowledged that it is very difficult to recruit even moderate sample sizes of people who stutter. It was concluded that one way to help improve this situation is collaboration of multiple research centres or, in the case of a randomised controlled trial, inclusion of multiple recruitment sites in one study. This strategy was adopted in the randomised controlled trial reported in this thesis. Two retrospective file audit studies of children treated with the Lidcombe Program were conducted in Australia and Britain. One purpose of these file audits was to obtain information relevant to the design and conduct of the randomised controlled trial. Data from the case reports on more than 300 children from the two sites were included in a meta-analysis. Results showed that a median of 11 weekly clinic sessions were required for children to attain the criteria for low levels of stuttering for completion of Stage 1 of the Lidcombe Program. Approximately 90% of children had achieved those criteria within 6 months of beginning treatment and almost all children had achieved them within 1 year. In addition two variables were found to be associated with longer treatment duration: more severe pre-treatment stuttering and shorter times from onset of stuttering to the start of treatment. The latter was apparent in the meta-analysis but not for the individual cohorts. As a result of these findings, pre-treatment stuttering severity was stratified along with other relevant variables in the randomised controlled trial and follow up for participants was a minimum of 9 months. A simulation study was conducted prior to analysis of data from the primary outcome measure of the randomised controlled trial: percentage of syllables stuttered (%SS). The distribution of %SS scores is positively skewed. Nonetheless, simulation showed t-test to be an appropriate analysis for this primary outcome measure. There were two treatment sites for the randomised controlled trial: the University of Canterbury (Christchurch, New Zealand) and the Stuttering Treatment and Research Trust (Auckland, New Zealand). A total of 54 preschool-age children were recruited: 29 to the Lidcombe Program and 25 to the control group. Half the proposed sample size was achieved due to slower than anticipated recruitment. This occurred because, as the trial progressed, treatment with the Lidcombe Program became common knowledge among parents in New Zealand and they became increasingly reluctant to agree to have their child randomised to the trial. Analysis with t-test showed a highly statistically significant difference (p = 0.003) at 9-months post-randomisation. The mean percentage of syllables stuttered (%SS) at 9-months post-randomisation was 1.5 (SD = 1.4) for the Lidcombe Program group compared to 3.9 (SD = 3.5) for the control group, resulting in a treatment effect of 2.3 %SS (95% confidence interval: 0.8-3.9). This treatment effect was more than double the minimum clinically worthwhile difference specified in the trial protocol. These results show that the Lidcombe Program is significantly more effective than natural recovery for reducing stuttering levels in preschool children. The Lidcombe Program is the first early stuttering treatment to be shown to be more effective than natural recovery in a randomised controlled trial.

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease affecting an estimated 1% of the global population. Joint protection is one intervention with some quality evidence of efficacy for RA self-management. However, joint protection education is often provided only in urban centres during Arthritis Self-Management Programs (ASMPs) in classroom sessions at designated times. These programs, therefore, may not be available to all who need them. Providing and testing more accessible methods of delivering joint protection education to people living with RA may improve accessibility. Aims: (i) To develop a virtual world (VW) intervention available via the Internet in Second Life®, that aims to improve the knowledge of joint protection among people with RA and (ii) to undertake a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the feasibility of conducting a subsequent large scale RCT. Methods: First, qualitative interviews with occupational therapists and clients living with RA who had previous experiences teaching or taking arthritis self-management programmes were undertaken and thematically analysed. This analysis informed the design of the VW joint protection education intervention. Second, the intervention was constructed and tested with these same participants. Their feedback helped refine the VW intervention and select assessment tools for the pilot RCT. Third, in a pilot RCT, three primary methods of advertising and invitation were used to recruit subjects: (i) poster invitations with take-home paper copies from clinical settings; (ii) direct messages to Twitter® users living with RA; and (iii) online discussion forums. Participants were recruited after contacting the principal investigator, reading an invitation letter and giving written informed consent. Participants were randomised to intervention or (30-day) waiting list control group, and completed a series of measures. These were completed after 30 days of program access for the treatment group and on enrolment in the study for the control group. Survey completion was online and included piloted knowledge-based questions about joint protection, validated during the second phase of the study with occupational therapists who were experts in joint protection education. A higher score was indicative of better joint protection knowledge. Standardized measures used on the survey included the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale, Short Form, version II (AIMS2SF) and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ). Results: It was possible to develop a VW education program focused on RA and joint protection based on the content identified by participants in the first part of the study and test with the tools selected. The program developed included input from client users, following the theorectical basis of occupational therapy as a client-centred practice. Additionally, the program developed applied principles of adult-learning and the recommendations of existing programs regarding chronic disease management. Recruitment of 50 participants for the pilot RCT was challenging, taking 6 months with low response rates for all three methods. The poorest response rates were to poster and paper invitations in clinical settings. The most effective means of recruitment was via electronic bulletin boards, such as blogs. All subjects, once randomised to the control or intervention group completed the online questionnaire. However, adherence to the intervention was poor; only 15 out of 25 randomised reported using the program. On the other hand, all 15 who used the program indicated that this medium was acceptable to learn about joint protection, despite 5/15 of these subjects reporting some difficulty accessing the program. All participants completed the three questionnaires (knowledge, impact, pain self-efficacy) and these may be useful in a definitive RCT. Although the main purpose of using Intention to Treat Analysis in pilot studies is to practice and check that analysis is feasible, there was a positive statistically significant difference between the treatment (x̄=52.8%) and control (x̄=24%) group scores on a test of joint protection knowledge using an independent samples t-test (F value, 20.8 p < 0.05) comparing joint protection knowledge scores after the treatment group had access to the program for 30 days. A higher score was indicative of better joint protection knowledge. The difference between the two groups was considerable, with the intervention group score mean being more than double that of the control group. Given the magnitude of this difference between groups, a smaller difference between groups would also be worth finding. The difference between groups for the AIMS2SF and PSEQ were not statistically significant using an independent samples t-test (F values, 0.5 and 0.2) but there was some suggestion that the intervention group scored more favourably on some of the subscales more relevant to joint protection on both the AIMS2SF and PSEQ, particularly noteworthy was a higher score pertaining to ability to carry out work on both measures. In a definitive trial a sample size of 1250 participants would give 80% power to find a difference of 28.8% on joint protection knowledge, weighted score of 1.8 on the AIMS2SF and overall score of 1.8 on the PSEQ at 5% level of significance. Smaller samples would be required if the PSEQ was dropped as a measure in a future study. Sample sizes of 14 and 558 would be required for the joint protection knowledge and AIMS2SF respectively at the same level of power and significance. Conclusion: A VW intervention to improve joint protection knowledge has been developed and is worth testing further. The intellectual contribution of the creation of this program using this methodology is that an occupational therapy based study using client input and priniciples of adult learning to create the intervention has been conducted, applying client-centred practice in research, which is, in reality, present in a minority of studies at this time. A full RCT would be feasible, though very challenging, given the numbers of subjects required for recruitment, most likely recruiting via the Internet on relevant RA focus sites, such as RA bloggers, and using the same outcome measures as in this study. A sample size of 1250 could feasibly be recruited in 36 months if a full time study were undertaken with suggestions discussed to assist with future study recruitment. However, given the number of study dropouts at enrolment seen in this study, close to double this number would be needed, entailing a recruitment period of up to 72 months, or 6 years, making a full RCT less practical. A future study may need to consider either a longer enrolment period, different outcome measures as well as address the limitations of this study, including the limited time of enrolment in this pilot RCT. However, longer enrolment duration would increase the amount of time required for a future full RCT, reducing the feasibility of a future study. Findings from this study indicate that the program developed would likely to be useful to people who are not able to access the urban centred classroom based program. On the other hand, those participants who used the program incurred no costs, appeared to have no risks or detrimental impact with possible improvement in knowledge and self-efficacy. Now the intervention has been developed, refinement, maintenance, and use is low cost for service providers, so it could be used routinely now for those who prefer it to ASMPs with an ongoing preference trial.

abstract: The present study applied latent class analysis to a family-centered prevention trial in early childhood to identify subgroups of families with differential responsiveness to the Family Check-up (FCU) intervention. The sample included 731 families of 2-year- olds randomized to the FCU or control and followed through age five with yearly follow up assessments (Dishion et al., 2014; Shaw et al., 2015). A two-step mixture model was used to examine whether specific constellations of family characteristics at age 2 (baseline) were related to intervention response at age 3, 4, and 5. The first step empirically identified latent classes of families based on a variety of demographic and adjustment variables selected on the basis of previous research on predictors of response to the FCU and parent training in general, as well as on the clinical observations of FCU implementers. The second step modeled the effect of the FCU on longitudinal change in children's problem behavior in each of the empirically derived latent classes. Results suggested a five-class solution, where a significant intervention effect of moderate-to- large size was observed in one of the five classes. The families within the responsive class were characterized by child neglect, legal problems, and mental health issues. Pairwise comparisons revealed that the intervention effect was significantly greater in this class of families than in two other classes that were generally less at risk for the development of disruptive behavior problems, and post hoc analyses partially supported these results. Thus, results indicated that the FCU was most successful in reducing child problem behavior in the highly distressed group of families. We conclude by discussing the potential practical utility of these results and emphasizing the need for future research to evaluate this approach's predictive accuracy. / Dissertation/Thesis / Masters Thesis Psychology 2016