Spelling suggestions: "subject:"cooperative extension dervice"" "subject:"cooperative extension bservice""
11 |
The role of the cooperative extension service as perceived by North Carolina Cooperative Extension service administrators /Comer, Marcus M. January 2002 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2002. / Typescript. Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 80-87). Also available on the Internet.
|
12 |
The role of the cooperative extension service as perceived by North Carolina Cooperative Extension service administratorsComer, Marcus M. January 2002 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2002. / Typescript. Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 80-87). Also available on the Internet.
|
13 |
An assessment of interorganizational relations among community education organizations in selected nonmetropolitan counties of ArizonaHiller, Joel K. January 1980 (has links)
No description available.
|
14 |
The effect of a short-term sex education course on parents' attitudesRussell, Enid Clara, 1923- January 1972 (has links)
No description available.
|
15 |
A culturally relevant foods and nutrition curriculum versus a culturally limited foods and nutrition curriculumHernandez, Judith Carol, 1944- January 1972 (has links)
No description available.
|
16 |
The Cooperative Extension Office at your serviceWaechter, James B. January 1985 (has links)
The purpose of this creative project was to develop a program on video tape that would briefly explain the local Cooperative Extension Office, the programs and the assistance available. Audio-visual material available prior to this consisted of one slide tape set approximately 10 years old. In the new video tape a short history of Extension, and an overview of each area of the local Extension Office are explained, using examples of how the local Extension Agents provide assistance to the community. The disciplines include 4-H, Agriculture, Family and Consumer Sciences and Community Development.Development of the video tape included planning, script writing, filming, editing and documentation of the project. The major task was to present the best, most informative material explaining the role of Extension with-out being long and boring. By showing preliminary tapes to control groups and making changes as suggested. A final format was established that should most effectively explain the Extension Office and its services.
|
17 |
Attaining positions of leadership : an exploratory study of the careers of women chief executive officers in the Cooperative State Research Extension Service at land-grant universities /Mayer, Lucille C. January 1999 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 1999. / Typescript. Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 154-163). Also available on the Internet.
|
18 |
Attaining positions of leadership an exploratory study of the careers of women chief executive officers in the Cooperative State Research Extension Service at land-grant universities /Mayer, Lucille C. January 1999 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 1999. / Typescript. Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 154-163). Also available on the Internet.
|
19 |
An analysis of the implementation of the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service's Performance Planning, Counseling, and Evaluation program using the Probability of Adoption of Change modelJahn, Larry G. 14 August 2006 (has links)
The purpose of the study was to explain the proportion of the variance in the level of implementation of the Performance Planning, Counseling, and Evaluation (PPC&E) program that could be attributed to the nine Probability of Adoption of Change (PAC) model constructs. Level of implementation was operationally defined as the degree to which county directors implemented the many elements of the PPC&E program. The nine PAC model constructs included: advantage probability, championship, circumstances, idea comprehensibility, opposition, practicality, strategies, superintendency, and value compatibility. / Ph. D.
|
20 |
Beef producers' attitudes toward the Virginia Cooperative Extension Service and their assessment of extension methods of disseminating informationObahayujie, Julius O. January 1986 (has links)
This study determined the attitudes of part-time and full-time beef producers in southwest Virginia toward the Virginia Cooperative Extension Service and their assessment of the methods used by the agency in disseminating information to its clientele.
Descriptive research design was utilized for this study. The population consisted of 1202 beef producers located in Carroll, Grayson, Russell, Washington, and Wythe counties in southwest Virginia. Beef production is their main source of farm income. A random sample of 300 beef producers was systematically selected for the study. Based upon the percentage of annual gross income from beef production, the producers were categorized as part-time and full-time producers.
Data were collected by use of a structured questionnaire developed by the researcher with assistance from a panel of experts. The instrument was divided into three parts; part one was used to obtain background information, part two (Likert-type scale) was used to measure respondents' attitudes, and the third part was used to measure respondents' assessment of the methods of disseminating Extension information. Mailed instruments were returned by 201 producers (67%) in usable form. Information collected from the survey instruments was transferred to the computer and analyzed via the SPSSX program at the Virginia Tech Computer Center. Statistical procedures used in analyzing the data included frequencies, measures of central tendency, an independent t-test, and the Pearson Product-Moment Coefficient of Correlation. Six research questions were used as a guide for analyzing and reporting the data.
The following major conclusions were reached: (1) that both parttime and full-time beef producers possessed a slightly unfavorable attitude toward the Virginia Cooperative Extension Service beef cattle program; (2) that both part-time and full-time beef producers had a slightly unfavorable attitude toward the Virginia Cooperative Extension Service overall agricultural program; (3) that both part-time and fulltime beef producers possessed a slightly unfavorable attitude toward the qualifications of the local Virginia Cooperative Extension Service agricultural agents; and (4) that both part-time and full-time beef producers assessed the Virginia Cooperative Extension Service methods of disseminating information to farmers as more effective than ineffective. / Ed. D.
|
Page generated in 0.0819 seconds