Spelling suggestions: "subject:"cosmic ray - 1ieasurement."" "subject:"cosmic ray - remeasurement.""
1 |
Determination of the absolute intensities of cosmic-ray muons at sea level劉愼言, Lau, Shun-yin. January 1973 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Physics / Master / Master of Philosophy
|
2 |
Studies of cosmic ray composition using a hybrid fluorescence detectorSimpson, K. M. (Kenneth Mark) January 2001 (has links) (PDF)
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 174-188). Describes several aspects of cosmic ray composition studies using the Utah Fly's Eye and High Resolution Fly's Eye detectors.
|
3 |
LEAP: A balloon-borne search for low energy cosmic ray antiprotons.Moats, Anne Rosalie Myers. January 1989 (has links)
The LEAP (Low-Energy Antiproton) experiment is a search for cosmic-ray antiprotons in the 120 MeV to 1.2 GeV kinetic energy range. The motivation for this project was the result announced by Buffington et al. (1981) that indicated an anomalously high antiproton flux below 300 MeV; this result has compelled theorists to propose sources of primary antiprotons above the small secondary antiproton flux produced by high energy cosmic-ray collisions with nuclei in the interstellar medium. LEAP consisted of the NMSU magnet spectrometer, a time-of-flight system designed at Goddard Space Flight Center, two scintillation detectors, and a Cherenkov counter designed and built at the University of Arizona. Analysis of flight data performed by the high-energy astrophysics group at Goddard Space Flight Center revealed no antiproton candidates found in the 120 MeV to 360 MeV range; 3 possible antiproton candidate events were found in the 500 MeV to 1.2 GeV range in an analysis done here at the University of Arizona. However, since it will be necessary to sharpen the calibration on all of the LEAP systems in order to positively identify these events as antiprotons, only an upper limit has been determined at present. Thus, combining the analyses performed at the University of Arizona and Goddard Space Flight Center, 90% confidence upper limits of 3.5 x 10⁻⁵ in the 120 MeV to 360 MeV range and 2.3 x 10⁻⁴ in the 500 MeV to 1.2 GeV range for the antiproton/proton ratio is indicated by the LEAP results. LEAP disagrees sharply with the results of the Buffington group, indicating a low antiproton flux at these energies. Thus, a purely secondary antiproton flux may be adequate at low energies.
|
4 |
Counter telescope measurements of the variation of sea-level cosmic-ray intensities in Hong KongLee, Hinglun, Allan., 李慶麟. January 1964 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Physics / Master / Master of Science
|
5 |
A Fourier transform spectrometer for millimeter and submillimeter wavelengthsShoemaker, David Hopkins January 1980 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Physics, 1980. / MICROFICHE COPY AVAILABLE IN ARCHIVES AND SCIENCE. / by David Hopkins Shoemaker. / M.S.
|
6 |
MOMENTUM SPECTRA OF CHARGED PARTICLES DETECTED BY A MOUNTAIN ALTITUDE COSMIC RAY MASS SPECTROMETER.SEMBROSKI, GLENN HARRY. January 1983 (has links)
A cosmic ray magnetic particle spectrometer utilizing wire spark chambers and a superconducting magnet for momentum determination and scintillators for charge and velocity determination has been operated on top of Mt. Lemmon near Tucson, Arizona at an atmospheric depth of 747 g/cm². Twenty weeks of data were taken and the proton energy spectrum in the momentum range of 0.6 to 2.4 GeV/c has been determined. Antiproton events were observed and a p/p ratio of 1.5(+1.85,-0.95) x 10⁻³ at a momentum of 1.05 GeV/c was measured. Deuteron intensities and alpha particle upper limits for this energy region are also presented.
|
7 |
Cosmic and solar radiation monitoring of Australian commercial flight crew at high southern latitudes as measured and compared to predictive computer modellingGetley, Ian L., Department of Aviation, Faculty of Science, UNSW January 2007 (has links)
This study set out to examine the levels of galactic cosmic radiation exposure to Australian aircrew during routine flight operations, with particular attention to the high southern latitude flights between Australia and South Africa. Latitudes as high as 65?? South were flown to gain the data and are typical of the normal flight routes flown between Sydney and Johannesburg on a daily basis. In achieving this objective it became evident that suitable commercially available radiation monitoring equipment was not readily available and scientific radiation monitors were sourced from overseas research facilities to compliment my own FH4lB and Liulin monitors provided by UNSW. At the same time it became apparent that several predictive codes had been developed to attempt to model the radiation doses received by aircrew based on flight route, latitudes and altitudes. Further, it became apparent that these codes had not been subjected to verification at high southern latitudes and that they had not been validated for the effects of solar particle events. Initially measurements were required at the high latitudes followed by mid-latitude data to further balance the PCAIRE code to ensure reasonableness of results for both equatorial and high latitudes. Whilst undertaking this study new scientific monitors became available which provided an opportunity to observe comparative data and results. The Liulin, QDOS and a number of smaller personal dosimeters were subsequently obtained and evaluated. This appears to be the first time that such an extensive cross comparison of these monitors has been conducted over such a wide range of latitudes and altitudes. During the course of this study a fortuitous encounter with GLE 66 enabled several aspects of code validation to be examined, namely the inability of predictive codes to estimate the increased dose associated with a GLE or the effects of a Forbush decrease on the code results. Finally I review the known biological effects as discussed by numerous authors based on current epidemiological studies, with a view to high-lighting were the advent of future technology in aviation may project aircrew dose levels.
|
Page generated in 0.0929 seconds