An experiment was conducted in Phoenix in 1986 to determine effects of water and N deficits on ABA and IAA concentrations in young bolls and their abscission zones in relation to boll retention, and to determine the effects of N on growth of fruiting branches through the season. Water deficit decreased boll retention, decreased the concentration of free IAA in bolls and their abscission zones, and increased ABA in bolls and abscission zones. But, the concentration of ester IAA increased with water deficit (in contrast to free IAA). Because ester IAA resists degradation during stress, it may facilitate recovery when stress is relieved and some of it is converted to free IAA. N-deficiency symptoms were mild and did not appear early in the season. N had no effect on the ABA and IAA contents of bolls and their abscission zones, and had only a small effect on growth of fruiting branches. The N test is to be repeated in 1987 when N deficiency should be more severe.

No description available.

No description available.

Plant growth products manufactured by BioHumaNetics, Inc. were evaluated in 1986 for a second consecutive year in the same field at the Maricopa Agricultural Center. Treatments included: 1) no fertilizers added, 2) standard fertilization recommended for the farm, and 3) a treatment schedule prescribed by BioHumaNetics. The non fertilized treatment had a significantly lower total yield than the two fertilized treatments.

PIX was applied to cotton in 10 and 20 gallons of water to evaluate the effect of dilution rate on plant growth regulation. No statistical differences were seen at the one pint rate, but the trends looked like the higher rate of water increased the plant growth regulation (i.e., decreased plant height and increased yield). Increasing the rate of PIX to 2 pints in 20 gallons of water, to maintain the same concentration as 1 pint in 10 gallons of water, was detrimental to the yields.

No description available.

The third year was completed of a study designed to evaluate the effects of Burst Yield Booster, a cytokinin based plant growth regulator, on upland cotton. Five treatments were included in the 1986 experiment, which varied application timing, rate, and frequency. Consistent with our studies of the past two seasons, no significant differences in yield were observed.

A field trial was conducted to study the elements of application timing and herbicide compatibility in the use of Burst, a plant growth regulator, and the effects of these two factors on yield of upland cotton. Eight treatments combined the two factors of timing and tank mix. The results showed no significant difference in yield between treatments.