Spelling suggestions: "subject:"crisis management inn government.during"" "subject:"crisis management inn government.a""
1 |
The crisis management in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: a case study of the human swineinfluenzaYeung, Suk-yee., 楊淑兒. January 2010 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Politics and Public Administration / Master / Master of Public Administration
|
2 |
The dynamics of crisis management in the Hong Kong governmentKam, Hing-fat, William., 金興發. January 1989 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Public Administration / Master / Master of Social Sciences
|
3 |
An analysis of policy agenda-setting in Hong Kong: the avian flu caseChiu, Yu-chow., 趙汝洲. January 1999 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Public Administration / Master / Master of Public Administration
|
4 |
從抗震动员看當代中国政治的变化. / Anti-earthquake mobilization in four decades: understanding political change in contemporary China / Understanding political change in contemporary China / CUHK electronic theses & dissertations collection / Cong kang zhen dong yuan kan dang dai Zhongguo zheng zhi de bian hua.January 2012 (has links)
本研究从超常规色彩强烈的重大灾害危机处置入手,分析当代中国动员体制在改革时代的变化特征,以此为切入点来考察动员这项“革命制度遗产对当代中国政治的影响。本研究以中国政府在地震领域的危机动员实践作为实证案例,从1949年以后的不同时期选取四场震例进行纵向比较,以此来把握中国政府在危机条件下启动的政治动员在不同的政治发展阶段会呈现出什么样的整体特点。中国在地震领域的危机动员实践能够证明,中国的政治动员体制比传统动员政治研究假定的要更具动态性。兴起于革命时代的政治动员在进入改革时代以后依然能够延续,并没有随着乌托邦意识形态、计划经济乃至全能主义体制的整体瓦解而走向直线衰落。至少作为中国政府独特的公共危机处置手段,政治动员在改革时代呈现出的变化轨迹是复杂的,成形于全能主义时期的动员政治元素在改革时代不仅没有直接衰败,在某些阶段还重新获得了发展动力,能够与改革时代出现和或者强化的动员模式并存。本研究通过观察中国政府跨越不同政治经济发展阶段的地震危机动员实践发现,中国政府涉灾财政能力和行政能力的发展均衡程度,以及中国政治精英对国家在灾害治理领域角色定位的认知变化,能够对中国政府的地震危机动员模式产生重要影响;既包括s新模式兴起和旧模式衰落,也包括新旧模式的共存。而且,尽管国家能力和国家意愿之间没有必然关联,可是一旦两个因素出现比较同步的增强,还能够为这种“革命制度遗产在改革提供新的制度化动力,促成动员模式更进一步的变化。本研究的结论是,只要作为关键动员主体的中共政权在规范和结构上保持相对稳定,政治动员仍将会是中国政府重要的危机管理工具。而且随着中国政府有更强的意愿和能力来承担公共服务供给职责,政治动员形式和内涵都会有所改变。曾经具有很强非正式和应急色彩的政治动员不仅会变得越来越常态化,而且还会成为正规、任务内容更加广泛的中国涉灾公共治理体系的重要组成部分。 / This research investigates the dynamics and resilience of China’s politlical moblization by making hsitrocial comparison of Chinese government’s management of earthquake disasters across four decades. The author selects four major earthquake catastrophesTangshan, Lancang-Gengma, Lijiang, and Wenchuanfrom different historical periods to examine how Chinese government mobilized different types of subjects to contain and control crises under different political, social, and economic conditions. Based upon participatory and non-participatory observation, interviews, and extensive document analyses, this research reveals that China’s political mobilization, at least in the issue area of catastrophe management, has demonstrated a more complicated trajectory of change than predicted by most mainstream politilcal theories, espeically in the post-revolutionary era featured by increasing socio-economic pluralization and political liberalization. Insitutional elements promoting mass particpation and self-sufficience thriving in the revolutionary stage not only continue to function in the reform era, but also coexist with newly emerged mobilizational elements featured by increased state dominance, formal legal procedures, and professional expertise. Based on systematic historical comparison, the author argues that two important factors, besides macro socio-economic transformation, shape the unlinear changing trajectory of politilcal mobilization in the specific area of disaster management: degree of assertiveness of the (central) state and state capacity. This research concludes that as long as the key mobilizing agent, the ruling Communist party, remains normatively and structurally stable, political mobilization would continue to be an important instrument for the Chinese authorities to cope with natural disasters, although its populist and ad hoc nature would give way to higher degree of professionalization and routinization. More importantly, politilcal mobilization will not only promote but also become an integrated part of a more formal and comprehensive component of China’s risk governance, as the regime is getting more willing and capable to shoulder the responsibility to deliver more and better public good. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / 彭林. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2012. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 174-204). / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Abstracts in Chinese and English. / Peng Lin. / Chapter 第1章 --- 导论 --- p.1 / Chapter 1.1 --- 当代中国动员政治的变化:文献回顾 --- p.4 / Chapter 1.2 --- 如何界定动员 --- p.9 / Chapter 1.3 --- 动员模式及其变化 --- p.11 / Chapter 1.4 --- 如何解释动员模式变化 --- p.16 / Chapter 1.4.1 --- 发展水平 --- p.17 / Chapter 1.4.2 --- 国家角色定位 --- p.18 / Chapter 1.4.3 --- 国家能力 --- p.19 / Chapter 1.5 --- 对研究方法的一些说明 --- p.21 / Chapter 1.6 --- 文章结构 --- p.23 / Chapter 第2章 --- 唐山地震:大众动员的巅峰与转折 --- p.29 / Chapter 2.1 --- 1949年以后中国的大众动员抗灾体制 --- p.29 / Chapter 2.2 --- 从邢台到海城:动员型抗震体制的形成 --- p.32 / Chapter 2.2.1 --- 邢台地震:新中国第一场抗震救灾及其制度遗产 --- p.32 / Chapter 2.2.2 --- “69号文件与海城地震:主动动员模式的确立 --- p.40 / Chapter 2.3 --- 唐山地震 --- p.43 / Chapter 2.3.1 --- “漏报:主动动员模式弱点暴露 --- p.43 / Chapter 2.3.2 --- 城市灾害对大众动员模式的整体挑战 --- p.46 / Chapter 2.3.3 --- “跨时代的动员:中国抗灾动员政治的延续与变化 --- p.50 / Chapter 第3章 --- 澜沧-耿马地震:专业化动员的崛起于大众动员的延续 --- p.53 / Chapter 3.1 --- 大众动员模式在地震领域的不均衡衰落 --- p.53 / Chapter 3.1.1 --- 地震工作转型与主动动员模式的变 --- p.54 / Chapter 3.1.2 --- 农村经济改革对灾后重建的冲击 --- p.56 / Chapter 3.2 --- 澜沧-耿马地震 --- p.58 / Chapter 3.2.1 --- 备灾动员的变化:从“群测群防到“内松外紧 --- p.58 / Chapter 3.2.2 --- 应急预案与应急动员理性化 --- p.59 / Chapter 3.2.3 --- 震后重建:筹资压力与大众动员的延续 --- p.61 / Chapter 3.2.4 --- 新资源的出现于国家动员的延伸 --- p.64 / Chapter 第4章 --- 丽江地震:1990年代大众动员模式“重新强势 --- p.70 / Chapter 4.1 --- 综合减灾能力建设与专业化动员的发展局限 --- p.71 / Chapter 4.2 --- 国家后撤对动员型抗灾体制的冲击 --- p.74 / Chapter 4.2.1 --- 救灾分级挂你了与动员主体层次下沉 --- p.75 / Chapter 4.2.2 --- 开放式民间自我保障机制的扩张及其影响 --- p.78 / Chapter 4.3 --- 丽江地震 --- p.80 / Chapter 4.3.1 --- 主动备灾动员进一步正规化与衰落 --- p.80 / Chapter 4.3.2 --- 震后重建:外部动员与灾区就地动员 --- p.82 / Chapter 第5章 --- 汶川地震:复合型动员模式成型 --- p.95 / Chapter 5.1 --- 从“生产自救到“国家主导:中国救灾员模式转变 --- p.96 / Chapter 5.1.1 --- “非典与危机“管理的出现 --- p.97 / Chapter 5.1.2 --- 中国灾害治理“社会转向 --- p.99 / Chapter 5.2 --- “重新动员社会及其影响 --- p.102 / Chapter 5.2.1 --- “向钱看:社会捐赠动员体系的发展 --- p.102 / Chapter 5.2.2 --- 新的人力动员:从农村转向城市 --- p.105 / Chapter 5.3 --- 汶川地震 --- p.107 / Chapter 5.3.1 --- 震后应急与专业化动员的发展 --- p.108 / Chapter 5.3.2 --- 汶川重建与对口支援的新变化 --- p.110 / Chapter 5.3.3 --- 国家动员与社会动员的互动 --- p.120 / Chapter 5.4 --- 汶川地震与抗灾动员新模式 --- p.127 / Chapter 第6章 --- 跨越四十年的抗震动员:比较与讨论 --- p.136 / Chapter 6.1 --- 跨越四十年的地震灾害治理和抗震动员 --- p.137 / Chapter 6.2 --- 解释动员模式的变化 --- p.141 / Chapter 6.2.1 --- 发展水平提升带来的复杂影响 --- p.141 / Chapter 6.2.2 --- 国家角色定位的变化 --- p.144 / Chapter 6.2.3 --- 灾害治理能力的多变性 --- p.148 / Chapter 6.3 --- 抗震动员模式变化的复杂性 --- p.151 / Chapter 6.3.1 --- 震前备灾动员模式的变化 --- p.153 / Chapter 6.3.2 --- 震后应急动员模式的变化 --- p.154 / Chapter 6.3.3 --- 重建动员模式的变化 --- p.156 / Chapter 6.4 --- 分析与发现 --- p.159 / Chapter 第7章 --- 结语 --- p.167 / Chapter 7.1 --- 政治动员的连贯性与非线性变迁 --- p.167 / Chapter 7.2 --- 中国动员型危机治理模式的独特性与横向比较的可能性 --- p.169 / 参考书目 --- p.174 / Chapter 附录1 --- 访谈 --- p.205 / Chapter 附录2 --- 档案 --- p.207 / Chapter 附录3 --- 年鉴、公报、地方志和专业志 --- p.209 / Chapter 附录4 --- 过往报纸和期刊 --- p.212 / Chapter 附录5 --- 开放数据库 --- p.212 / Chapter 附录6 --- 中国灾情数据 --- p.213
|
5 |
An analysis of the decision making process of the public crisis management in Hong Kong: 2003 SARSoutbreakLam, Wing-chiu, Jessie. January 2005 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Public Administration / Master / Master of Public Administration
|
6 |
政府危機管理 : 從非典中看政府危機公關 / 從非典中看政府危機公關虞慧琦 January 2004 (has links)
University of Macau / Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities / Department of Government and Public Administration
|
7 |
Public management in times of crises: a studyof recent experience in Hong KongChu, Sim-kiu, Venus., 朱嬋嬌. January 1999 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Public Management / Master / Master of Public Administration
|
8 |
The media and crisis management in Hong KongLee, Tsan, Oscar., 李臻. January 1999 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Public Administration / Master / Master of Public Administration
|
Page generated in 0.1454 seconds