Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-08-16T22:04:10Z No. of bitstreams: 1 CleantoAlvesPantaleaoFilho_DISSERT.pdf: 1451907 bytes, checksum: a54f40871dc158f0067374b2f099905d (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-08-23T19:44:13Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 CleantoAlvesPantaleaoFilho_DISSERT.pdf: 1451907 bytes, checksum: a54f40871dc158f0067374b2f099905d (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-23T19:44:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 CleantoAlvesPantaleaoFilho_DISSERT.pdf: 1451907 bytes, checksum: a54f40871dc158f0067374b2f099905d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-04-01 / A presente disserta??o tem como objetivo principal analisar a exposi??o de crucifixos em salas de sess?es e audi?ncias do poder judici?rio, considerada a liberdade religiosa e as limita??es decorrentes da ideia da neutralidade do Estado. Sabe-se que, a Constitui??o de 1988 protege a liberdade de manifesta??o do pensamento, bem como de consci?ncia e de cren?a (artigo 5?, incisos IV e VI), proclamando, no artigo 19, inciso I, a laicidade ou neutralidade do Estado, como refor?o a essas mesmas liberdades, evitando a confus?o entre Estado e religi?o, admitida, no entanto, a colabora??o de interesse p?blico. Esse dualismo entre vida espiritual e temporal, com a divis?o entre cl?rigos e seculares e entre pol?tica e religi?o foi fruto da desconfessionaliza??o e ? uma caracter?stica da modernidade, sem que possa significar um absoluto desprezo pelo fen?meno religioso. A metodologia utilizada nesta disserta??o trata-se de uma pesquisa bibliogr?fica e documental, atrav?s de livros e disserta??o, al?m das legisla??es relacionados ao tema em quest?o. Discute-se, mesmo sendo o povo brasileiro majoritariamente cat?lico e reconhecida a forte influ?ncia que os valores crist?os exercem sobre os poderes p?blicos, n?o ? poss?vel simplesmente desconsiderar os direitos das minorias religiosas ou mesmo dos sem religi?o, numa Rep?blica que se diz democr?tica e que tem como um dos objetivos fundamentais promover o bem de todos, sem qualquer forma de discrimina??o. Conclui-se que, em pr?dios e estabelecimentos p?blicos, de s?mbolos e imagens cat?licas, a exemplo do crucifixo, surgem diversas dificuldades em conciliar a garantia da liberdade religiosa e o princ?pio da laicidade e o que se pretende ? exatamente propor uma solu??o que consiga respeitar o pluralismo e a diversidade num contexto em que o catolicismo continua sendo uma presen?a marcante. / This thesis aims to analyze the cross exhibition in sessions halls and audiences of the judiciary, considered the religious freedom and the limitations arising from the idea of State neutrality. It is known that the 1988 Constitution protects freedom of expression of thought, conscience and religion, in its various aspects, proclaiming, on the other hand, the neutrality of the state, to reinforce these same freedoms. Thus, the aim is to avoid confusion between state and religion, admitted, however, collaboration of public interest, in respect of attitude to the beliefs and individual choices of citizens. In modern societies, the dualism between the civil power and religion has to do with laicity and a broader phenomenon that took the name of secularism, meaning the loss of space of religion in societies or even decreased idea religious belonging. It is based on this finding that the work develops with reference to concepts such as civil society and rule of law relevant to an accurate understanding of the problem. The methodology consists of bibliographic and documentary research through books and thesis, in addition to the legislation and some precedents related to the topic in question, looking to investigate whether, even though the predominantly Catholic Brazilian people and recognized the strong influence that Christian values exercise on the public authorities, it is possible to sustain the symbolic differentiation state, a republic that is said secular and democratic and which has as one of the fundamental objectives to promote the good of all, without any form of discrimination. Starting from the idea that the presence in buildings and public institutions, symbols and Catholic imagery, like the crucifix, has some difficulty in reconciling the guarantee of religious freedom and the principle of laicity, the idea is to exactly propose a solution who can respect pluralism and diversity in a context where Catholicism remains a strong presence.