The cryptographic algorithms are designed to be mathematically secure; however, side-channel analysis attacks go beyond mathematics by taking measurements of the device’s electrical activity to reveal the secret data of a cipher. These attacks also go hand in hand with fault analysis techniques to disclose the secret key used in cryptographic ciphers with even fewer measurements. This is of practical concern due to the ubiquity of embedded systems that allow physical access to the adversary such as smart cards, ATMs, etc.. Researchers through the years have come up with techniques to block physical attacks to the hardware or make such attacks less likely to succeed. Most of the conducted research consider one or the other of side-channel analysis and fault injection attacks whereas, in a real setting, the adversary can simultaneously take advantage of both to retrieve the secret data with less effort. Furthermore, very little work considers a software implementation of these ciphers although, with the availability of small and affordable or free microarchitectures, and flexibility and simplicity of software implementations, it is at times more practical to have a software implementation of ciphers instead of dedicated hardware chips. In this project, we come up with a modular presentation, suitable for software implementation of ciphers, to allow having simultaneous resistance against side-channel and fault analysis attacks. We also present an extension at the microarchitecture level to make our proposed countermeasures more intact and efficient. / M.S. / Ciphers are algorithms designed by mathematicians. They protect data by encrypting them. In one of the main categories of these ciphers, called symmetric-key ciphers, a secret key is used to both encrypt and decrypt the data. Once the secret key of a cipher is retrieved, anyone can find the decoded data and thereby access the original data. Cryptographers traditionally sought to design ciphers in such a way that no adversary could reveal the secret key by finding holes in the algorithm. However, this has been shown insufficient for a specific implementation of a cryptographic algorithm to be considered as “unbreakable” since the physical properties of the implementation, can help an adversary find the secret key and break the encryption. Analyzing these physical properties can be either active; by making controlled changes in the normal progress of its execution, or passive; by merely measuring the physical properties during normal execution. Designers try to take these analyses into account when implementing a cryptographic function and so, in this project, we aim to present architectural support for a combination of some of the countermeasures.