Previous studies have found nutritional status to predict better functional and cognitive ability in dementia. The current study investigated the relationship between nutritional status and progression of neuropsychological impairment in a U.S. sample of persons with dementia. Participants were studied for up to 6 years in the population-based Cache County, UT, study. Baseline sample included 240 persons with dementia (71.3% Alzheimer’s disease, 52.1% female). Mean (SD) age and dementia duration at baseline was 85.6 (5.2) and 3.4 (1.9) years, respectively. Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD) neuropsychological test battery and Boston Naming Test (30-item) were administered annually. Nutritional status was assessed using a modified Mini Nutritional Assessment (mMNA). Components of nutritional status were chosen for further investigation (dietary intake and BMI). Linear mixed effects models examined change in nutritional status and food consumption over time as well as the association between mMNA and its components (time-varying) with each neuropsychological measure and rate of decline over time. The following covariates were tested as appropriate: dementia type, gender, age of dementia onset and duration (at baseline), education, neuropsychiatric symptoms, caregiver coresidence, place of residence, overall health, and dementia severity. mMNA scores decreased by .22 pts/year (p = .006), though this was confounded by dementia severity (β = -.12, p = .108). Consumption of carbohydrates (β = -.09), protein (β = -.07) and fruit/vegetables (β = -.08) also declined over time, all p < .05). Better nutritional status was associated with better neuropsychological test scores across all visits in verbal learning (β = .23), praxis drawing (β = .23), praxis memory (β = .08), verbal fluency (β = .34) and confrontation naming (β = .31), while mMNA predicted rate of decline in verbal recognition memory (β = .13); all p < .001, with the inclusion of covariates. Higher protein intake was associated with worse verbal learning, while higher BMI predicted better scores on all neuropsychological tests except for confrontation naming. The results emphasize the importance of nutritional status in dementia and raises the possibility of nutritional interventions that may improve patient outcomes.

Introdução: No Brasil há carência de instrumentos validados para a análise do curso da Demência Frontotemporal (DFT). Dessa forma, torna-se relevante a validação da Escala de Estadiamento e Progressão da Demência Frontotemporal (FTD-FRS). Em nosso meio, as escalas de estadiamento das demências, como a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), foram elaboradas para graduar a doença de Alzheimer (DA) e não incluem os sintomas específicos da DFT. Objetivos: 1. Realizar a tradução, adaptação transcultural e validação da FTD-FRS para o contexto brasileiro. 2. Avaliar a capacidade da FTD-FRS detectar alterações em pacientes com DFTvc, afasia progressiva primária (APP) e DA após 12 meses da avaliação inicial, em comparação com a escala CDR para DLFT, e com a CDR original. Métodos: Participaram do estudo 101 indivíduos com idade igual ou superior a 40 anos, com escolaridade formal acima de dois anos, sendo 31 pacientes com diagnóstico de DFT variante comportamental (DFTvc), doze pacientes com afasia progressiva primária (APP), 28 pacientes com doença de Alzheimer (DA), oito com comprometimento cognitivo leve (CCL) e 22 controles normais (CN). Foram entrevistados os familiares ou cuidadores que tinham contato frequente com o paciente. Os pacientes com DA, e com os subtipos de DFT foram pareados quanto à gravidade da doença, segundo a CDR. Resultados: Foi realizado o processo de adaptação transcultural da FTD-FRS. Consistiu em: tradução, retrotradução (realizadas por tradutores independentes), discussão com especialistas sobre a versão em português e equivalência com a versão original, e desenvolvimento da versão final. A consistência interna da FTD-FRS, estimada pelo alfa de Cronbach foi 0,975, e o coeficiente de correlação intra-classe, para a estabilidade no teste e reteste em seis meses foi de 0,977. A análise fatorial revelou a existência de quatro fatores que se correlacionaram significativamente com os domínios da CDR-DLFT. Os pacientes com DFTvc apresentaram progressão mais rápida em 12 meses do que os demais subtipos de demência na FTD-FRS, na CDR-DLFT e na CDR-original. Considerações finais: A FTD-FRS tem propriedades psicométricas adequadas para seu uso clínico no Brasil. Este instrumento pode auxiliar na caracterização de sintomas clínicos relevantes para o diagnóstico e estadiamento da DFT. Também pode documentar os resultados relacionados à intervenção terapêutica. Este estudo fornece aos clínicos e pesquisadores um instrumento válido para estadiamento e acompanhamentode de pacientes diagnosticados com DFT / Introduction: In Brazil there is a shortage of validated instruments for the analysis of the course of Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD). Thus, the validation of the Frontotemporal Dementia Staging and Progression Scale (FTD-FRS) becomes relevant. In our setting, dementia staging scales, such as the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), were designed to stage Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) and did not include the specific symptoms of FTD. Objectives: 1. To perform the translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the FTD-FRS for the Brazilian context. 2. Evaluate the ability of the FTD-FRS to detect changes in patients with bvFTD, primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and AD after 12 months of the initial evaluation, compared to the CDR scale for FTLD, and with the original CDR. Methods: A total of 101 individuals aged 40 years and older, with formal schooling above two years of age, were included in the study. Twenty-one patients were diagnosed with bvFTD, twelve patients with PPA, 28 AD, eight with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 22 normal controls (NC). Family members or caregivers who had frequent contact with the patient were interviewed. Patients with AD and with FTD subtypes were matched for disease severity, according to CDR. Results: The process of cross-cultural adaptation of the FTD-FRS was carried out. It consisted of: translation, back-translation (carried out by independent translators), discussion with experts about the Portuguese version and equivalence with the original version, and development of the final version. The internal consistency of the FTD-FRS, estimated by the Cronbach\'s alpha was 0.975, and the intra-class correlation coefficient for the test and retest stability at six months was 0.977. Factor analysis revealed the existence of four factors that correlated significantly with the CDR-DLFT domains. Patients with bvFTD showed faster progression at 12 months than the other dementia subtypes in the FTD-FRS, CDR-DLFT and CDR-original version scales. Final considerations: FTD-FRS has psychometric properties suitable for clinical use in Brazil. This instrument may aid in the characterization of clinical symptoms relevant to the diagnosis and staging of FTD. It can also document the results related to therapeutic interventions. This study provides clinicians and researchers with a valid instrument for staging and follow-up of patients diagnosed with FTD

Introdução: No Brasil há carência de instrumentos validados para a análise do curso da Demência Frontotemporal (DFT). Dessa forma, torna-se relevante a validação da Escala de Estadiamento e Progressão da Demência Frontotemporal (FTD-FRS). Em nosso meio, as escalas de estadiamento das demências, como a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), foram elaboradas para graduar a doença de Alzheimer (DA) e não incluem os sintomas específicos da DFT. Objetivos: 1. Realizar a tradução, adaptação transcultural e validação da FTD-FRS para o contexto brasileiro. 2. Avaliar a capacidade da FTD-FRS detectar alterações em pacientes com DFTvc, afasia progressiva primária (APP) e DA após 12 meses da avaliação inicial, em comparação com a escala CDR para DLFT, e com a CDR original. Métodos: Participaram do estudo 101 indivíduos com idade igual ou superior a 40 anos, com escolaridade formal acima de dois anos, sendo 31 pacientes com diagnóstico de DFT variante comportamental (DFTvc), doze pacientes com afasia progressiva primária (APP), 28 pacientes com doença de Alzheimer (DA), oito com comprometimento cognitivo leve (CCL) e 22 controles normais (CN). Foram entrevistados os familiares ou cuidadores que tinham contato frequente com o paciente. Os pacientes com DA, e com os subtipos de DFT foram pareados quanto à gravidade da doença, segundo a CDR. Resultados: Foi realizado o processo de adaptação transcultural da FTD-FRS. Consistiu em: tradução, retrotradução (realizadas por tradutores independentes), discussão com especialistas sobre a versão em português e equivalência com a versão original, e desenvolvimento da versão final. A consistência interna da FTD-FRS, estimada pelo alfa de Cronbach foi 0,975, e o coeficiente de correlação intra-classe, para a estabilidade no teste e reteste em seis meses foi de 0,977. A análise fatorial revelou a existência de quatro fatores que se correlacionaram significativamente com os domínios da CDR-DLFT. Os pacientes com DFTvc apresentaram progressão mais rápida em 12 meses do que os demais subtipos de demência na FTD-FRS, na CDR-DLFT e na CDR-original. Considerações finais: A FTD-FRS tem propriedades psicométricas adequadas para seu uso clínico no Brasil. Este instrumento pode auxiliar na caracterização de sintomas clínicos relevantes para o diagnóstico e estadiamento da DFT. Também pode documentar os resultados relacionados à intervenção terapêutica. Este estudo fornece aos clínicos e pesquisadores um instrumento válido para estadiamento e acompanhamentode de pacientes diagnosticados com DFT / Introduction: In Brazil there is a shortage of validated instruments for the analysis of the course of Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD). Thus, the validation of the Frontotemporal Dementia Staging and Progression Scale (FTD-FRS) becomes relevant. In our setting, dementia staging scales, such as the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), were designed to stage Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) and did not include the specific symptoms of FTD. Objectives: 1. To perform the translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the FTD-FRS for the Brazilian context. 2. Evaluate the ability of the FTD-FRS to detect changes in patients with bvFTD, primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and AD after 12 months of the initial evaluation, compared to the CDR scale for FTLD, and with the original CDR. Methods: A total of 101 individuals aged 40 years and older, with formal schooling above two years of age, were included in the study. Twenty-one patients were diagnosed with bvFTD, twelve patients with PPA, 28 AD, eight with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 22 normal controls (NC). Family members or caregivers who had frequent contact with the patient were interviewed. Patients with AD and with FTD subtypes were matched for disease severity, according to CDR. Results: The process of cross-cultural adaptation of the FTD-FRS was carried out. It consisted of: translation, back-translation (carried out by independent translators), discussion with experts about the Portuguese version and equivalence with the original version, and development of the final version. The internal consistency of the FTD-FRS, estimated by the Cronbach\'s alpha was 0.975, and the intra-class correlation coefficient for the test and retest stability at six months was 0.977. Factor analysis revealed the existence of four factors that correlated significantly with the CDR-DLFT domains. Patients with bvFTD showed faster progression at 12 months than the other dementia subtypes in the FTD-FRS, CDR-DLFT and CDR-original version scales. Final considerations: FTD-FRS has psychometric properties suitable for clinical use in Brazil. This instrument may aid in the characterization of clinical symptoms relevant to the diagnosis and staging of FTD. It can also document the results related to therapeutic interventions. This study provides clinicians and researchers with a valid instrument for staging and follow-up of patients diagnosed with FTD